Data Supporting the Impact of Regulatory Compliance Costs on Small Airports, Volume 2: Technical Appendixes to ACRP Report 90 (2013) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 107-119
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 108... ...
• Scale map of the airport and peripheral area • Detailed map showing landside, airside and security restricted areas and access control points • Airline operator's contact information • Private organizations/businesses/tenants operating at the airport In 2000, the FAA's Office of Intelligence regularly analyzed and evaluated threat information from the intelligence community and determined if there was a threat to aviation. If there was, the Office of Policy and Plans, in coordination with the Office of Security Operations, designed countermeasures to combat the threat and issued an Emergency Amendment (EA)
|
From page 109... ...
The FAA had been working on revisions to FAR Part 107 for several years and had incorporated some of these requirements into a draft rulemaking document in the summer of 2001. The revisions had not been published prior to September 11, 2001.
|
From page 110... ...
TSA and FAA issued a final rule published in the Federal Register (67 FR 8340) on February 22, 2002 that transferred all rules governing civil aviation security from FAA to TSA.
|
From page 111... ...
C. Published Cost Information Only one security rulemaking document – an FAA amendment to Parts 107 and 108 to eliminate exceptions to the criminal history check requirement (Table A-4, Item #21)
|
From page 112... ...
Figure TA-28. Airports Installing Security Equipment or Access Control Systems (Sample: 72-83 airports)
|
From page 113... ...
Table TA-27. Reported Costs For Installing Security Equipment or Access Control Systems Questions Valid Responses (# of airports)
|
From page 114... ...
27% of airports reported being affected by the CBP design standards. This lower percentage probably reflects the lack of CBP activities at many small airports.
|
From page 115... ...
Table TA-28. Reported Costs for Screening and Inspection Projects Questions Valid Responses (# of airports)
|
From page 116... ...
event, however. Also, some airports may include the cost of TSA space in calculating terminal rental rates for airlines.
|
From page 117... ...
E.1 Potential Funding Sources for Security Requirements AIP and PFC Funding ATSA made capital development to comply with TSA security requirements eligible for AIP passenger entitlement and discretionary funds. In FY 2002 and FY 2003, AIP funding for security projects increased substantially to support reconfiguration of passenger screening checkpoints and checked baggage handling equipment and facilities.
|
From page 118... ...
E.2 Use of Financial Assistance The Phase 2 survey requested information on funding sources for passenger and checked baggage screening systems and for compliance with CBP requirements. The survey did not include questions about funding sources for security and access control equipment and facilities.
|
From page 119... ...
30 25 20 15 28 10 5 10 7 2 0 None Less Than 90 percent 90‐95 percent 100 percent 1Counts include airports completing both baggage and passenger screening projects Figure TA-32. "Other Source" Funding Sources for Baggage and Passenger Screening Projects1 As shown in Figure TA-32, a similarly large majority (28 out of 46 projects)
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.