Practical Highway Design Solutions (2013) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 31-34
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 31... ...
31 Findings states That Have a Practical design Policy Of the 41 states that responded to a survey questionnaire, six were identified as having an explicit Practical Design policy. Missouri, Oregon, and Utah use the term Practical Design, Kentucky and Idaho the term Practical Solutions, and Kansas the term Practical Improvements.
|
From page 32... ...
32 across the state within limited budgets. Some of the states interviewed acknowledged initial concerns by staff when Practical Design was first introduced to them, primarily because of not always using the higher level of design values for projects.
|
From page 33... ...
33 used for Practical Design. For the states interviewed, they see these two initiatives as being separate programs, but as noted Utah views its Practical Solutions as a combination of these two initiatives.
|
From page 34... ...
34 to assume how the performance measures would have changed without a Practical Design policy. Nonetheless, some high-level, macroscopic evaluation of the Practical Design approach is recommended so that its efficacy can be established for future considerations.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.