Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 17-25

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 17...
... 8 2. SYNTHESIS: THE STATE OF THE ART AND THE STATE OF THE PRACTICE In this section of the report we describe existing academic theory and research methods to estimate the economic impacts of transit investments, focusing on agglomeration impacts.
From page 18...
... 9 Transit-supportive plans and policies are defined by FTA as those that support pedestrian mobility and accessibility, and include pedestrian network connectivity, building setbacks, parking design, requirements, and regulations, the land use mix, and residential and commercial densities. These are documented through an inventory of relevant plans, policies, and ordinances, as well as a narrative description of potential barriers such as environmental contamination.
From page 19...
... 10 rapid dissemination of specialized production knowledge. The relative importance of each of these agglomeration mechanisms is not well understood empirically, though there is a welldeveloped set of theories.
From page 20...
... 11 TABLE 1 Transit projects and hypothesized agglomeration mechanisms Agglomeration mechanism Likely facilitated by transit projects? Input sharing (enabling horizontal vertical disaggregation, that is, small, nimble firms instead of large ones; and supplier specialization)
From page 21...
... 12 TABLE 2 Possible variation in additional economic benefits Cost Time savings "Other" economic benefits Notes Example 1 $1.5bn $0.80bn $0.10bn Low demand for project Example 2 $0.50bn $0.75bn $0.50bn Relieve transportation bottleneck Example 3 $0.50bn $0.10bn $0.20bn Post-project travel/congestion Example 4 $2.50bn $0.90bn $1.80bn Ability to attract agglomeration of firms There may also be other additional economic benefits of transit investments that are related to but distinct from agglomeration effects, including: • Transit network effects • Economic multiplier effects • Reduced income-tax-related deadweight loss • Greater price competition The first of these is the increasing returns to scale in waiting, walking, and transfer times that come with higher-density transit networks. Some transit investments may reduce waiting, walking, and transfer times, but these depend on specific details of the transit network and also of the corresponding pedestrian network.
From page 22...
... 13 roads that are used by freight, leading to the possibility of effectively larger market areas for some industries. Interviews We conducted eighteen practitioner interviews with transit agencies, metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs)
From page 23...
... 14 benefit analysis, proprietary models such as REMI and TREDIS, input-output models, and real estate investment studies (these are discussed in the next section)
From page 24...
... 15 TABLE 3 Summary of methods used by sample studies Study Cost–benefit Analysis Input-Output/CGE Real Estate Ad Hoc Chicago Metropolis X TREDIS Access to the Region's Core (ARC) X REMI X Metrolinx X Proprietary X MAROps X REMI X New York Cross Harbor X REMI Chicago Region Freight (CREATE)
From page 25...
... 16 defined in the academic literature; see Appendix C)

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.