Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 41-55

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 41...
... 41 A p p e n d i x A This appendix describes the spectroscopic equipment and testing protocols used in the laboratory testing portion of this project. The testing protocols include procedures for the preparation of samples, acquisition of data, and interpretation of results.
From page 42...
... 42Table A.1. Finalized List of Materials to Be Tested in Phase 2 Material Category Brand Manufacturer Number of States Approving the Material Original State (Liquid, Solid, Powder, Other)
From page 43...
... 43 Figure A.1. Image of ALPHA ATR FTIR portable spectrometer.
From page 44...
... 44 3. Cured epoxy adhesive samples (Ultrabond 1100 and Sikadur 31)
From page 45...
... 45 included in the scope of this project. The reasoning behind this was to eliminate the least successful materials and focus on the feasible materials in Raman field testing in Phase 3.
From page 46...
... 46 elements: P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Sr, Zr, Mo, Ag, Cd, Sn, I, Ba, W, Hg, and Pb. There are two separate calibration modes for this particular XRF: one mode for trace elements in soils (concentrations up to 8% to 10% by weight)
From page 47...
... 47 mately 2 to 4 h of scanning time, while HR required 8 to 12 h of scanning time. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the XRD data was performed using Jade software, Version 8.5 (MDI, 2008)
From page 48...
... 48 • Polystyrene standards with molecular weights of 2,000,000, 900,000, 824,000, 400,000, 200,000, 110,000, 43,000, 30,000, 17,600, 6,930, 2,610, 982, and 450 were used to establish the calibration curve. • Peak molecular weights were identified and labeled on the spectra.
From page 49...
... 49 Test Sample Preparation Because the NMR requires material to be in the liquid state, the following preparation methods were used: 1. Structural coatings, traffic paints, and epoxy adhesives were dissolved in 2 mL of CDCl3 (D-chloroform)
From page 50...
... 50 Table A.4. Summary of Portable Equipment Evaluation in Phase 2 Featurea Value FTIR Raman XRF XRD Accuracy Minimum 1% <0.5% <2% <1% <1% Goal <0.5% Duration of measurement Maximum 1 h ~1 min ~1 min 6–12 min 15 min Goal ~5 min Effort involved Maximum 1 person 1 person 1 person 1 person 1 person Goal 1 person Amount of prior training Maximum 1 day 1 h 1 h 1 h 1 h Goal 0.5 day Reliability Minimum Depends on material (90%)
From page 51...
... 51 Figure A.8. Distribution of pavement marking brands approved by state highway agencies (SHAs)
From page 52...
... 52 Figure A.10. Distribution of epoxy resin brands approved by SHAs.
From page 53...
... 53 Figure A.12. Distribution of PCC set retarder and accelerator brands approved by SHAs.
From page 54...
... 54 Figure A.14. Distribution of PCC curing compound brands approved by SHAs.
From page 55...
... 55 Figure A.16. Distribution of polymer-modified emulsion vendors approved by SHAs.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.