The National Academies Press

Currently Skimming:

Pages 505-506

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.

From page 505... ... I-1 Image Credits Chapter 3 Figure 3-1: Missouri Department of Transportation; Figure 3-2: Federal Highway Administration; Figure 3-3: Aimen Consulting; Figure 3-4: Morgan State University; Figures 3-5, 3-12, 3-15, 3-17, 3-27: Neighborhood Solutions; Figures 3-6, 3-20: Miami Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization; Figures 3-7, 3-8: New York City Department of Transportation; Figure 3-9: Center for Neighborhood Technology; Figures 3-13, 3-19, 3-34, 3-40, 3-41: Hoopa Valley Tribe; Figures 3-14, 3-22, 3-23, 3-35: Tennessee Department of Transportation; Figure 3-11: City of Columbia, SC; Figures 3-18, 3-21, 3-26: Atkins; Figure 3-16: Atlanta Regional Commission; Figure 3-24: The Atlanta Development Authority; Figure 3-25: Alaska Department of Transportation; Figures 3-28, 3-33, 3-36: City of Seattle; Kentucky Transportation Cabinet; Figure 3-29: Figures 3-30, 3-47: Wisconsin Department of Transportation; Figure 3-31: Michigan Department of Transportation; Figure 3-32: City of Austin; Figure 3-34: Northwest Tribal Technical Assistance Program, Richard Rolland; Figures 3-37, 3-38: Carter & Carter Associates; Figure 3-39: Federal Highway Administration; Figure 3-42: Safe Routes to Schools National Partnership; Figure 3-43: New Jersey Department of Transportation; Figure 3-44: La Casa de Don Pedro; Figure 3-45: Georgia Institute of Technology, Center for Quality Growth and Regional Development; Figure 3-46: San Francisco Public Health Department; Figure 3-47: Missouri Department of Transportation; Figure 3-48: Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Chapter 4 Figure 4-1: Coastal Carolina University; Figures 4-2, 4-3: Miami Dade MPO; Figure 4-4: Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission; Figures 4-5, 4-6: Atlanta Regional Commission; Figures 4-7, 4-8, 4-9: Tennessee Department of Transportation; Figure 4-10: Kentucky Transportation Council; Figure 4-11, 4-12, 4-13: Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho; Figure 4-14: Lummi Nation; Figure 4-15: NW Tribal Technical Assistance Program, Richard Rolland; Figures 4-16, 4-17: Federal Highway Administration; Figures 4-18, 4-19: Georgia Department of Transportation; Figure 4-20: Southwest Region Planning Commission; Figure 4-21: San Antonio-Bexar County Metropolitan Planning Organization; Figures 4-22, 4-23, 4-24: City of Seattle; Figures 4-25, 4-26, 4-27: Morgan State University; Figure 4-28: Baltimore Metropolitan Council; Figure 4-29: Pittsburgh Interfaith Impact Network; Figures 4-30, 4-31, 4-32: Colorado Department of Transportation; Figures 4-33, 4-34: North Carolina Department of Transportation; Figure 4-35: Washington State Department of Transportation; Figures 4-36, 4-37, 4-38: Mississippi Department of Transportation; Figures 4-39, 4-40: Central Puget Sound's Regional Transit Authority, Sound Transit; Figure 4-41: Urban Habitat; Figure 4-42: Read the entire page →
From page 506... ... I-2 Practical Approaches for Involving Traditionally Underserved Populations in Transportation Decisionmaking Missouri Department of Transportation; Figure 4-43: Shriver Center; Figures 4-44, 4-45: Arizona Department of Transportation; Figure 4-46: Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Chapter 5 Figures 5-1, 5-2, 5-3: Morgan State University; Figure 5-4: Neighborhood Solutions; Figure 5-5: Hillsborough County Metropolitan Planning Organization; Figure 5-6: Colorado Department of Transportation; Figure 5-7: Central Puget Sound's Regional Transit Authority, Sound Transit; Figure 5-8: Massachusetts Department of Transportation; Figure 5-9: La Casa de Don Pedro; Figure 5-10: Somerset County, Ridewise Authority; Figure 5-11: Alamo Regional Mobility; Figure 5-12: Tennessee Department of Transportation; Figure 5-13: City of Seattle Department of Transportation; Figure 5-14: City of Alexandria, Virginia; Figure 5-15: Carter & Carter Associates; Figure 5-16: Atkins; Figure 5-17: Google Maps; Figure 5-18: Georgia Department of Transportation; Figure 5-19: Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho; Figures 5-20, 5-21: Chicago Metro Area Planning; Figure 5-22: Northwest Tribal Technical Assistance Program, Richard Rolland; Figure 5-23: Hoopa Valley Tribe; Figure 5-24: New Jersey Department of Transportation; Figure 5-25: La Casa De Don Pedro; Figure 5-26: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; Figure 5-27: Oregon Department of Transportation. Read the entire page →

From page 505...

... I-1 Image Credits Chapter 3 Figure 3-1: Missouri Department of Transportation; Figure 3-2: Federal Highway Administration; Figure 3-3: Aimen Consulting; Figure 3-4: Morgan State University; Figures 3-5, 3-12, 3-15, 3-17, 3-27: Neighborhood Solutions; Figures 3-6, 3-20: Miami Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization; Figures 3-7, 3-8: New York City Department of Transportation; Figure 3-9: Center for Neighborhood Technology; Figures 3-13, 3-19, 3-34, 3-40, 3-41: Hoopa Valley Tribe; Figures 3-14, 3-22, 3-23, 3-35: Tennessee Department of Transportation; Figure 3-11: City of Columbia, SC; Figures 3-18, 3-21, 3-26: Atkins; Figure 3-16: Atlanta Regional Commission; Figure 3-24: The Atlanta Development Authority; Figure 3-25: Alaska Department of Transportation; Figures 3-28, 3-33, 3-36: City of Seattle; Kentucky Transportation Cabinet; Figure 3-29: Figures 3-30, 3-47: Wisconsin Department of Transportation; Figure 3-31: Michigan Department of Transportation; Figure 3-32: City of Austin; Figure 3-34: Northwest Tribal Technical Assistance Program, Richard Rolland; Figures 3-37, 3-38: Carter & Carter Associates; Figure 3-39: Federal Highway Administration; Figure 3-42: Safe Routes to Schools National Partnership; Figure 3-43: New Jersey Department of Transportation; Figure 3-44: La Casa de Don Pedro; Figure 3-45: Georgia Institute of Technology, Center for Quality Growth and Regional Development; Figure 3-46: San Francisco Public Health Department; Figure 3-47: Missouri Department of Transportation; Figure 3-48: Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Chapter 4 Figure 4-1: Coastal Carolina University; Figures 4-2, 4-3: Miami Dade MPO; Figure 4-4: Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission; Figures 4-5, 4-6: Atlanta Regional Commission; Figures 4-7, 4-8, 4-9: Tennessee Department of Transportation; Figure 4-10: Kentucky Transportation Council; Figure 4-11, 4-12, 4-13: Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho; Figure 4-14: Lummi Nation; Figure 4-15: NW Tribal Technical Assistance Program, Richard Rolland; Figures 4-16, 4-17: Federal Highway Administration; Figures 4-18, 4-19: Georgia Department of Transportation; Figure 4-20: Southwest Region Planning Commission; Figure 4-21: San Antonio-Bexar County Metropolitan Planning Organization; Figures 4-22, 4-23, 4-24: City of Seattle; Figures 4-25, 4-26, 4-27: Morgan State University; Figure 4-28: Baltimore Metropolitan Council; Figure 4-29: Pittsburgh Interfaith Impact Network; Figures 4-30, 4-31, 4-32: Colorado Department of Transportation; Figures 4-33, 4-34: North Carolina Department of Transportation; Figure 4-35: Washington State Department of Transportation; Figures 4-36, 4-37, 4-38: Mississippi Department of Transportation; Figures 4-39, 4-40: Central Puget Sound's Regional Transit Authority, Sound Transit; Figure 4-41: Urban Habitat; Figure 4-42:

Read the entire page →

From page 506...

... I-2 Practical Approaches for Involving Traditionally Underserved Populations in Transportation Decisionmaking Missouri Department of Transportation; Figure 4-43: Shriver Center; Figures 4-44, 4-45: Arizona Department of Transportation; Figure 4-46: Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Chapter 5 Figures 5-1, 5-2, 5-3: Morgan State University; Figure 5-4: Neighborhood Solutions; Figure 5-5: Hillsborough County Metropolitan Planning Organization; Figure 5-6: Colorado Department of Transportation; Figure 5-7: Central Puget Sound's Regional Transit Authority, Sound Transit; Figure 5-8: Massachusetts Department of Transportation; Figure 5-9: La Casa de Don Pedro; Figure 5-10: Somerset County, Ridewise Authority; Figure 5-11: Alamo Regional Mobility; Figure 5-12: Tennessee Department of Transportation; Figure 5-13: City of Seattle Department of Transportation; Figure 5-14: City of Alexandria, Virginia; Figure 5-15: Carter & Carter Associates; Figure 5-16: Atkins; Figure 5-17: Google Maps; Figure 5-18: Georgia Department of Transportation; Figure 5-19: Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho; Figures 5-20, 5-21: Chicago Metro Area Planning; Figure 5-22: Northwest Tribal Technical Assistance Program, Richard Rolland; Figure 5-23: Hoopa Valley Tribe; Figure 5-24: New Jersey Department of Transportation; Figure 5-25: La Casa De Don Pedro; Figure 5-26: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; Figure 5-27: Oregon Department of Transportation.

Read the entire page →

Key Terms

← Previous Chapter Skim

Next Chapter Skim →

This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.