Framework for Collaborative Decision Making on Additions to Highway Capacity (2014) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 33-38
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 33... ...
33 Moving Beyond Individual Barriers and Success Factors The case studies show that there are strong motivations to collaborate. Collaboration is not a new topic for the transportation industry.
|
From page 34... ...
34Table 5.1. Connection of Barriers and Success Factors Identified in Case Studies to the Framework Barrier Identified in Case Studies Applicable Solutions from Case Studies Relationship to the Framework Cross-phase issues Link phases of transportation decision making Structure decision-making process The Framework encompasses the key decision points in four phases of transportation decision making: long-range planning, corridor planning, programming and fiscal constraint, and environmental review.
|
From page 35... ...
35 Table 5.1. Connection of Barriers and Success Factors Identified in Case Studies to the Framework (continued)
|
From page 36... ...
36 Building on the Key Decision points What exactly is in each key decision point that supports collaboration? The basic information in each key decision point answers three main questions: • Who are the collaborative decision-making partners?
|
From page 37... ...
37 DECISION GUIDE LRP-4LRP-3LRP-2LRP-1 LRP-11LRP-10 LRP-8 LRP-9LRP-7LRP-6 Approve Transportation Deficiencies Approve Evaluation Criteria, Methods, and Measures Approve Vision and Goals Approve Scope of LRTP Process Approve Conformity Analysis Adopt LRTP by MPO Adopt Preferred Plan Scenario Adopt Finding of Conformity by MPO Approve Plan Scenarios Approve Strategies Approve Financial Assumptions LRP-5 PRO-1 PRO-2 PRO-3 PRO-4 PRO-5 PRO-6 PRO-7 PRO-8 Approve Revenue Sources Approve Methodology for Identifying Project Costs and Criteria for Allocating Revenue Approve Project List Drawn from Adopted Plan Scenario or Solution Set Approve Project Prioritization Reach Consensus on Draft TIP Adopt TIP by MPO Approve TIP by Governor and Incorporate into Draft STIP Reach Consensus on Draft STIP Approve STIP with Respect to Conformity and Fiscal Constraint PRO-9 COR-1 COR-2 COR-3 COR-4 COR-5 COR-6 COR-7 COR-8 Approve Scope of Corridor Planning Process Approve Problem Statements and Opportunities Approve Goals for the Corridor Reach Consensus on Scope of Environmental Review and Analysis Approve Evaluation Criteria, Methods, and Measures Approve Range of Solution Sets Adopt Preferred Solution Set Approve Evaluation Criteria, Methods, and Measures for Prioritization of Projects Adopt Priorities for Implementation COR-9 ENV-1 ENV-2 ENV-3 ENV-4 ENV-5 ENV-6 ENV-10 ENV-11 ENV-12 ENV-13 ENV-14 ENV-15 ENV-7 ENV-8 Reach Consensus on Scope of Environmental Review Approve Notice of Intent Approve Purpose and Need/Reach Consensus on Project Purpose Reach Consensus on Study Area Approve Evaluation Criteria, Methods, and Measures Approve Full Range of Alternatives Approve Preferred Alternative/LEDPA Approve Final Jurisdictional Determination Reach Consensus on Avoidance and Minimization for the LEDPA Approve Final EIS Approve the Record of Decision Render Permit Decision and Approve Avoidance and Minimization Approve Alternatives to Be Carried Forward Approve Draft EIS with Conceptual Mitigation Approve Resource Agency Public Notice ENV-9 LONG-RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW / NEPA MERGED WITH PERMITTING CORRIDOR PLANNING $ Figure 5.1. The Collaborative Decision-Making Framework.
|
From page 38... ...
38 use. This vast amount of data can be overwhelming if considered in its entirety.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.