Framework for Collaborative Decision Making on Additions to Highway Capacity (2014) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 65-78
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 65... ...
65 Introduction The methods used to carry out SHRP 2 Capacity Project C01 are summarized in this appendix. SHRP 2 SHRP 2 was created to address the challenges of moving people and goods efficiently and safely on the nation's highways.
|
From page 66... ...
66 least one project with a multistate setting and at least one design-build project. To capture detailed information that would help in developing the collaborative decision-making framework, the case studies were divided into comprehensive and phase case studies.
|
From page 67... ...
67 delivery of transportation projects were reviewed, and solution screening processes documented in this research were identified. Sources included documentation from metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs)
|
From page 68... ...
68 Generalized interview questions were developed for use during the study. Teams were responsible for tailoring the generalized interview questions for their process.
|
From page 69... ...
69 The design goals fall into five categories: collaboration, implementation, integration, project delivery, and systems based. The design goals by category are as follows: 1.
|
From page 70... ...
70 Workshop 1: The Basic Design The basic design of the CDMF (i.e., the individual key decision points and their order) was the focus of the first workshop.
|
From page 71... ...
71 conservation planning the team integrated the "Eco-Logical" process into the CDMF. Eco-Logical is an integrated transportation/conservation planning process developed by FHWA in partnership with representatives of all the federal resource agencies.
|
From page 72... ...
72 scales, provide a framework for understanding collaboration when making decisions about what are often incommensurable alternatives. The scales represent five characteristics which can be evaluated from low to high: decision-making authority, participant stability, role clarity, shared goals, and sense of ownership.
|
From page 73... ...
73 Although these two styles of stakeholder involvement were originally developed using the same dynamics of collaboration scales created in the solution screening workshop, it became clear in Workshop 5 that modifications and an additional scale were necessary to capture specific stakeholder dynamics of collaboration to support the scales developed to understand collaboration among the formal decision-making partners. The stakeholder dynamics of collaboration scales maintained the participant stability scale, but replaced the shared goals scale with common interests, and the sense of ownership scale with level of commitment.
|
From page 74... ...
74 of the tools and technologies in the transportation industry. The participants in Workshop 6 are listed in Table C.8.
|
From page 75... ...
75 CommuniCation StrategieS The primary communication strategy for the project was presentation format. Attendance at various conferences, work groups, and meetings over the 2-year period provided strong opportunities for outreach.
|
From page 76... ...
76 the capabilities of the CDMF web tool under construction. A full list of presentations through 2009 is provided in Table C.9.
|
From page 77... ...
77 article, The Collaborative Decision-Making Framework: Evolving Product of SHRP 2 Capacity Research, has stimulated interest on the topic of collaboration and provides an advance look at what the CDMF will provide. exhibitS and diSplayS at ConferenCeS Beginning with the poster session at the 2009 TRB Annual Meeting, opportunities to provide written materials/displays at conferences and meetings have provided additional outreach for the project.
|
From page 78... ...
78 tailored to their specific circumstances. The Change Management Approach includes a summary of the rationale and benefits for implementing collaboration from the national perspective, as well as suggestions for tailoring this national case for change to the individual implementing agencies.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.