Framework for Collaborative Decision Making on Additions to Highway Capacity (2014) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 79-83
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 79... ...
79 Criteria Statements For each category of assessment, several statements allow users to evaluate the existing process or team dynamics on a five-point scale: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, strongly agree, agree, not applicable. A full list of criteria statements is provided in Table D.1.
|
From page 80... ...
80 Table D.1. Criteria Statements Category Criteria Statements Process steps • Team members rarely voice disagreement with the documented process.
|
From page 81... ...
81 Shared goals • The initial requirements of the project are clearly stated. • The team members have changed over time.
|
From page 82... ...
82 what is and what is not working, and a specific set of corrective actions that need to be implemented by the team or its management to rectify any problems. Progress reports provide feedback to all levels (executive, management, and staff)
|
From page 83... ...
83 like have on the project. Doing so allows the team to be less reactive to changes, and to spend time planning an appropriate response.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.