Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 29-33

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 29...
... 29 The importance of the IHS to the nation's economy and transportation system, and to those of individual states, is beyond question. The benefits of an LOS approach for managing assets on the IHS have been well documented in previous reports.5–6 To assist state DOTs with developing and implementing an LOS assessment process, an Implementation Plan and User Guide are presented in the following sections.
From page 30...
... Table 5-1 and Table 5-2 show example formats similar to those that have been used successfully by several states (Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Washington, and the West Virginia Turnpike)
From page 31...
... 31 District Interstate Routes - 2008 LOS Ratings Asset Feature A B C D F Asphalt Pavements Potholes D+ Rutting C+ Stripping (Raveling) B+ Alligator Cracking B+ Block Cracking B+ Linear Cracking A Edge Raveling A+ Shoving A Sweeping A+ Concrete Pavements Spalling A Faulting C+ Joint Sealing A Crack Sealing B+ Punch-Outs B Pumping A Sweeping A+ Paved Shoulder Potholes B Edge Raveling B+ Unpaved Shoulder Drop-Off B- High Shoulder D Drainage Side Drains A Cross Drains D+ Edge Drains F Unpaved Ditches B+ Paved Ditches D- Drop Inlets F Table 5-2.
From page 32...
... 8. The difference between a target and actual LOS represents an incremental adjustment needed to a specific portion of the state's previous work program to reach the target LOS in the next budget year.
From page 33...
... long (20 mi for both directions) and another that is 30 mi long (60 mi in both directions)

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.