Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 17-29

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 17...
... 15 capillary soak protocol, the sample is placed on a porous stone and wrapped in an absorptive fabric and allowed to absorb water through capillary rise until the moisture front ceases to move or for at least 24 hours. Additional Tests Involved in Stabilizer Selection Once an additive has been selected based on the index properties of plasticity index and percent of the soil mass smaller than 75μm, the possible impact of deleterious components of the soil must be considered.
From page 18...
... 16 Soil Evaluation The first step in the NLA protocol is similar to the approach described in Figure 2 and in fact either the criteria described in Figure 2 or the criteria described in this section can be used. In this step, the soil fraction passing the no.
From page 19...
... 17 are fabricated. However, if it is difficult to achieve satisfactory homogeneity during laboratory mixing, it is reasonable to consider a mellowing period (between initial mixing and final mixing before compaction)
From page 20...
... 18 Extended Soaking for 8 Days (psi) Cyclic Freeze-Thaw 3 Cycles (psi)
From page 21...
... 19 fines will be appropriately altered as well. However, it is prudent to test the plasticity of the minus no.
From page 22...
... 20 understood, when extended mellowing is adopted, that all the strength lost during remixing may not be recovered with additional curing. Hardened soil cement mixtures must withstand adverse environmental conditions.
From page 23...
... 21 These cement contents are only preliminary estimates and must be verified or modified based on additional test results. Additional cement requirement for soils with higher organic contents should be considered based on pH test of soil cement mixtures (6)
From page 24...
... 22 cement modified soils. This method may also be considered an alternative method by which to assess the durability of cement stabilized soils.
From page 25...
... 23 Cement Treatment of Base Courses The protocol described above addresses cement-soil and cement-base mixtures. However, in certain situations a lower level of cement is used to achieve a target increase in compressive strength and/or modulus for structural performance reasons.
From page 26...
... 24 Mix Design Considerations Prior to stabilization, the cementitious properties of fly ash should be characterized following ASTM D 5239-04. But, it should be noted that ASTM D 5239-04 does not evaluate the interaction between fly ash and soil or aggregate which must to be verified separately based on mix design procedures outlined in the following paragraphs.
From page 27...
... 25 typically vary based on objectives and requirements specified by the agency and these requirements should be followed in selecting the mix design for field application. Non Self Cementing Fly Ash For stabilization with non self cementing fly-ash, the addition of activators such as lime or cement is required to initiate stabilization reactions.
From page 28...
... 26 preparation of three replicate samples for compressive strength testing for each blend of fly ash and activator. Curing of Samples for Compression and Durability Testing Fly-ash soil mixes are cured for 7-days in sealed containers.
From page 29...
... 27 quantities of fly ash should be added to the blend beginning with four percent fly ash and increasing in two percent increments until acceptable strength is achieved. A separate moisturedensity relationship is required for each blend.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.