Skip to main content

Uses of Fees or Alternatives to Fund Transit (2008) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:


Pages 22-23

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 22...
... 22 In light of Russ I, the San Francisco Planning Department has made the following recommendation: Any impact fee ordinance [should] be airtight: perform plenty of studies before adopting legislation, involve the public in hearings, and write the language of the ordinance to stand up against class action suits.
Read the entire page →
From page 23...
... 23 In jurisdictions such as Illinois and Pennsylvania, which authorize impact fees for road improvements only, and Oregon and Georgia, which do not authorize impact fees for transit, municipalities have utilized tax increment financing to add local funding for transit improvements.
Read the entire page →

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.