Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 33-43

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 33...
... 33 Field Testing Procedure Pilot testing of the procedure and equipment developed for determining the flow rate of water through the subsurface drainage systems in the SPS-1 and SPS-2 sites was conducted at the SPS-1 and SPS-2 sites in Arkansas and at other, non-LTPP sites in Wisconsin. Based on that testing, some improvements were made to the procedure before flow rate testing was conducted at the remaining SPS-1 and SPS-2 sites.
From page 34...
... 34 Figure 43. View from shoulder and close-up view of overgrown drainage outlet, Michigan SPS-2.
From page 35...
... 35 Figure 46. View from above and close-up view of overgrown drainage outlet, Delaware SPS-2.
From page 36...
... 36 Figure 49. Drainage outlet before and after being uncovered, Florida SPS-1.
From page 37...
... 37 Figure 53. Coring by state DOT personnel, Arkansas SPS-1.
From page 38...
... 38 Figure 55. Measuring distances between core hole and drainage outlet.
From page 39...
... 39 Figure 60. Flow meter.
From page 40...
... This equation can be rearranged as follows to solve for the hydraulic conductivity, k, as a function of a known flow rate, hydraulic gradient, and area: k = Q / i A For this study, the variables in the above equation are defined as follows (and illustrated in Figures 68 and 69) : k = estimated hydraulic conductivity of PATB (ft/day)
From page 41...
... Longitudinal grade (%) : 0.8 Distance measures (ft)
From page 42...
... Water inflow stopped (gal) : 83 Cross slope (elevation measures)
From page 43...
... L (ft)

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.