Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 1-36

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 1...
... 1The questions concerning smart growth are as var-ied as its definition. They include the following: 1.
From page 2...
... This decision was meant not to minimize the value of the many smart growth debates but instead to focus on an immediate need in the transportation community. In September 2002, more than 130 transportation and planning professionals met in Baltimore, Maryland, for a Conference on Providing a Transportation System to Support Smart Growth: Issues, Practice, and Implementation.
From page 3...
... modes, convenient travel by multiple modes, shorter distances between activities, and better accessibility. • Where: How does smart growth differ with location (urban infill, suburban redevelopment, and fringe growth)
From page 4...
... 4Opening Remarks Charles Howard, Washington State Department of Transportation During the next several days we will explore thetopic of transportation and smart growth and lookat better defining what parts of transportation support smart growth. Welcome to the Smart Growth Conference and thank you for coming to Baltimore.
From page 5...
... necessarily needs to recognize and serve those differences. We will explore these dimensions with three case studies.
From page 6...
... 63805_011_046 4/7/05 3:07 AM Page 6
From page 7...
... Why Why Smart Growth Is a Transportation Issue 63805_011_046 4/7/05 3:07 AM Page 7
From page 8...
... 63805_011_046 4/7/05 3:07 AM Page 8
From page 9...
... 9Introduction Anne Canby, Cambridge Systematics First, many in our business are not yet ready toacknowledge or recognize that transportation is,in fact, an essential element in land use. For years, we have tended to say, "It's not my job." I think those days are probably over.
From page 10...
... point that about 60 percent of the people surveyed do not like the current pattern of developing housing subdivisions separated from everything else, with all the commercial buildings lined up along the arterials in an automobile-only environment. We have that design to excess in every community we live in.
From page 11...
... 1 1 Transportation Trends and Smart Growth Alan Pisarski, Independent Consultant Iam happy to be here in Baltimore to talk abouttransportation trends and smart growth. I will startwith the need to talk about transportation broadly.
From page 12...
... alone rose by about 22 million. So the growth in the number of people driving alone in that decade exceeded the growth in the number of workers.
From page 13...
... be. Time is now the driver, particularly on the passenger side and particularly among women, but on the freight side as well.
From page 14...
... turned out to be wrong. It actually looked like this after the 2000 census (see Figure 12)
From page 15...
... central cities of one metropolitan area to central cities of another metropolitan area, and in flows from rural areas. The new census data showed that the state with the largest travel time increase was West Virginia.
From page 16...
... Approximately 60 percent of our population live in these 50 areas. Another 20 percent live in metropolitan areas with populations under 1 million, and another 20 percent, or 60 million people, live in rural areas.
From page 17...
... use. If all our trips have an economic or social transaction at their end, those transactions define both the purpose and the length of trips.
From page 18...
... I think we will be operating as what I call a challenged, affluent society. In this new world, the great issue will be the skilled workers -- finding skilled workers will be the key.
From page 19...
... 1 9 Development Pattern Trends and Smart Growth Gregg Logan, Robert Charles Lesser & Company I'm not a transportation expert, so it is a littleintimidating to be in this room full of transporta-tion experts talking about transportation. My area is land use, and we like to think that what it is and where you put it has a lot to do with transportation.
From page 20...
... Figure 2 is a fair share chart showing which areas are gaining and losing household market share. On the chart, a score of 1 equals equilibrium.
From page 21...
... The leading edge of the baby boomers is now 56 or 57 years old. I said a minute ago that they would hit retirement age at age 65 in 2010, but the age at which people make retirement housing decisions actually starts a lot younger, at 55 to 60.
From page 22...
... economics -- what is going on in the economy right now -- I'll just say that I think it has nothing to do with land use. If you look at what creates demand for goods and services and makes an economy go, it is demographics.
From page 23...
... terms of where we develop, what we develop, and what kind of transportation we connect it with. It is also important to think about how home-buying factors change with age.
From page 24...
... conventional suburban dwelling. Anne Canby mentioned that in 10 years, about 70 percent of all households will have no children.
From page 25...
... tant to note that historically employment has followed housing. The housing went to the suburbs first.
From page 26...
... What is the conclusion from all of this? The future may not be the past; there are a lot of market trends that favor smart growth development as a much bigger part of the mix; and at least one-third of future growth is malleable.
From page 27...
... middle-income residential infill opportunity. There are huge opportunities from a demand perspective, but a lack of incentives.
From page 28...
... 2 8 Land Use and Transportation Interactions Reid Ewing, Rutgers University In starting with the "You can't pave your way out ofcongestion" notion, I was asked to talk about theinterface between land use and transportation. Alan Pisarski started by talking about transportation.
From page 29...
... That leaves us with land use planning, which we think of as long-term demand management. As the stock in the other ideas -- demand management and supply enhancement -- has gone down, the stock of land use planning has gone up.
From page 30...
... The first sets of studies were of activity and neighborhood centers and how the design of those centers affects people's travel. We found 14 studies of this type.
From page 31...
... design -- a "pedestrian friendliness" factor. The finding here is that individual features don't seem to make much difference.
From page 32...
... means that if you increase the value of the index by 10 percent, you get a 1.6 percent reduction in VMT. That is not huge, but it is significant.
From page 33...
... 3 3 Discussion Reid Ewing: I have a question for Gregg. That one-third figure and the fact that only half of the current demand for more compact development is being met -- how did you figure that out?
From page 34...
... area makes a difference in terms of many transportation outcomes. But, as I recall, and I don't remember the exact results, it makes less difference than density or centeredness.
From page 35...
... that the public demands in terms of value of time. So, I'm halfway to where you want to go.
From page 36...
... 3 6 Working Definition of Smart Growth Charles Howard, Washington State Department of Transportation The conference planning committee had quite a bitof discussion about how much we should get intothe definition of smart growth in this conference. We decided that there has already been a lot of work on the definition of smart growth, and that is not the purpose of this conference.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.