Transit Supportive Parking Policies and Programs (2016) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 8-12
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 8... ...
8 to use the same catchment area for providing parking and the built environment, regardless of station access. The finding also conflicts with the work of Cervero (2006)
|
From page 9... ...
9 focusing on nonauto access at stations within towns, such as walking, biking, and feeder bus service. In all situations, they suggest providing a "strong evidence base" to often-skeptical stakeholders on the benefits of providing less parking and offering alternatives to driving (Engel-Yan et al.
|
From page 10... ...
10 advance benefit" and may "pay a premium for the luxury of knowing that they won't have to circle for parking once they reach their destination." Parking Impact on Transit Ridership Overall, the literature that documents the empirical relationship between parking capacity and demand for transit services is limited, although understanding the relative influence of the factors that affect transit ridership "is central to public policy debates over transportation system investments and the pricing and deployment of transit services" (Taylor and Fink 2003)
|
From page 11... ...
11 The land use around transit stations can also have an impact on parking demand and use. In "Office Development, Rail Transit, Community Choices," Cervero (2006)
|
From page 12... ...
12 stations that lack park-and-ride facilities. More neighbors supported reserving some on-street parking spaces for carsharing vehicles than for people visiting the area for work or errands (Shaheen et al.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.