The National Academies Press

Currently Skimming:

Pages 91-297

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.

From page 91... ... Appendix d Sample documents Related to performance Testing as part of Specifications for Asphalt Mixtures (electronic format only, available online) Appendix D Sample Documents Related to Performance Testing as Part of Specifications for Asphalt Mixtures (electronic format only, available online) Read the entire page →
From page 92... ... Minnesota DOT MnDOT 2013 Disk-shaped Compact Tension Test (DCT) Provision: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/research/RFP/2014proposals/summaries/Disc-ShapedTest.pdf New Jersey DOT NJDOT B-10 – Overlay Test for Determining Crack Resistance of HMA: http://www.nj.gov/transportation/eng/specs/2007/pdf/njdotb10.pdf Section 401 – Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Read the entire page →
From page 147... ... [10 R E S E A R C H PROJECT CAPSULE December 2011 Development of Performance Based Specifications for Louisiana Asphalt Mixtures JUST THE FACTS: Start Date: April 1, 2011 Duration: 36 months End Date: March 31, 2014 Funding: SPR Principal Investigator: Louay Mohammad, Ph.D. Professor 225-767-9126 Co-Principal Investigator: Minkyum Kim Research Associate 225-767-9126 Administrative Contact: Mark Morvant, P.E. Read the entire page →
From page 148... ... R E S E A R C H PROJECT CAPSULE 100 44 test. In addition, a suite of NDT in-situ tests that includes the falling weight deflectometer (FWD) Read the entire page →
From page 149... ... [ ] June 2011 PROBLEM Currently, Louisiana's Quality Control and Quality Assurance (QC/QA) Read the entire page →
From page 150... ... For more information about LTRC's research program, please visit our Web site at www.ltrc.lsu.edu. The proposed research study will be conducted according to the following tasks: • Task 1 – Conducting Literature Review • Task 2 – Developing a Simplifi ed SCB Test Apparatus (Modify Marshall Load Frame) Read the entire page →
From page 151... ... Minnesota Department of Transportation Disk-shaped Compact Tension Test (DCT) Provision Description The DCT (disk-shaped compact tension test) Read the entire page →
From page 152... ... • Selecting an asphalt binder that has a higher high end temperature grade than the specified grade (PG 64-xx instead of PG 58-xx) Read the entire page →
From page 156... ... SECTION 401 – HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) COURSES ADD THE FOLLOWING TO 401.01: 401.01 DESCRIPTION This Section also describes the requirements for constructing a Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) Read the entire page →
From page 157... ... ADD THE FOLLOWING TO 902: 902.11 HOT MIX ASPHALT HIGH RAP 902.11.01 Mix Designations The requirements for specific HMA mixtures with required minimum amounts of RAP are identified by the abbreviated fields in the Item description as defined as follows: HOT MIX ASPHALT 12.5H64 SURFACE COURSE HIGH RAP 1. "HOT MIX ASPHALT" "Hot Mix Asphalt" is located in the first field in the Item description for the purpose of identifying the mixture requirements. Read the entire page →
From page 158... ... The composition of the mixture for HMA HIGH RAP base or intermediate course is coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, asphalt binder, and a minimum of 30 percent Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) , and may also include mineral filler, up to 10 percent of additional recycled materials, asphalt rejuvenator, and Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) Read the entire page →
From page 159... ... the weight of the total mix. Determine the optimum percentage of asphalt binder according to AASHTO R 35 and M 323 with an Ndes as required in Table 902.02.03-2. Read the entire page →
From page 160... ... Ensure that the temperature of the mix at discharge from the plant or storage silo meets the recommendation of the supplier of the asphalt binder, supplier of the asphalt modifier and WMA manufacturer. For HMA, do not allow the mixture temperature to exceed 330°F at discharge from the plant. Read the entire page →
From page 161... ... Table 902.11.04-1 HMA HIGH RAP Requirements for Control Compaction Levels Required Density (% of Theoretical Max. Specific Gravity) Read the entire page →
From page 162... ... Plan Note: Polishing and Determining Friction of Gyratory Compacted Asphalt Specimens On this project conduct laboratory polishing and friction measurement of the surface course asphalt mixture as described below. Conduct polishing and friction testing on the surface course mix design approval submittal samples and QC six inch diameter gyratory samples. Read the entire page →
From page 163... ... 7. Automatic timer to shut off rubber polishing disc rotation at every one hour interval. Read the entire page →
From page 164... ... Date Contractor Name JMF Project No. Mix type Sample 1 Date/ time Sample 2 Date/ time Time (hr) Read the entire page →
From page 165... ... Mix type 424E10000 FINE GRADED POLYMER ASPHALT CONCRETE, TYPE A 424E12000 FINE GRADED POLYMER ASPHALT CONCRETE, TYPE B 424E12001 FINE GRADED POLYMER ASPHALT CONCRETE, TYPE B, AS PER PLAN 424E12011 FINE GRADED POLYMER ASPHALT CONCRETE, TYPE B, WITH 424E99000 SPECIAL - FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT 442E00200 ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, 9.5 MM, TYPE A (446) Read the entire page →
From page 166... ... STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENT SPECIFICATION 856 Bridge Deck Waterproofing Hot Mix Asphalt Surface Course October 18, 2013 856.01 Description 856.02 Materials 856.03 Asphalt Plant Requirements 856.04 Construction 856.05 Production Quality Control 856.06 Payment 856.01 Description The requirements of C&MS 401, 442, 448 and 702.01 apply except as modified below. Bridge Deck Waterproofing Hot Mix Asphalt Surface Course (WHMA) Read the entire page →
From page 167... ... JMF Criteria Specification Total Modified Binder, percent, min. 7.25 Gryations, Ndes/ Nmax 50/75 Air Voids, percent 1.5 VMA, percent, min. Read the entire page →
From page 168... ... optimum binder content from the approved mix design. If a density gauge has a known correction factor apply this factor. Read the entire page →
From page 169... ... 340 214 Item 340 Dense-Graded Hot-Mix Asphalt (Small Quantity) Read the entire page →
From page 170... ... 340 215 2.1.1.1. Blending Class A and Class B Aggregates. Read the entire page →
From page 171... ... 340 216 Table 1 Aggregate Quality Requirements Property Test Method Requirement Coarse Aggregate SAC Tex-499-A (AQMP) As shown on the plans Deleterious material, %, Max Tex-217-F, Part I 1.5 Decantation, %, Max Tex-217-F, Part II 1.5 Micro-Deval abrasion, % Tex-461-A Note1 Los Angeles abrasion, %, Max Tex-410-A 40 Magnesium sulfate soundness, 5 cycles, %, Max Tex-411-A 30 Crushed face count,2 %, Min Tex-460-A, Part I 85 Flat and elongated particles @ 5:1, %, Max Tex-280-F 10 Fine Aggregate Linear shrinkage, %, Max Tex-107-E 3 Combined Aggregate3 Sand equivalent, %, Min Tex-203-F 45 1. Read the entire page →
From page 172... ... 340 217 with documentation, such as the bill of lading, showing the quantity of additives used in the project unless otherwise directed. Read the entire page →
From page 173... ... 340 218 Do not use Department- or Contractor-owned RAP contaminated with dirt or other objectionable materials. Do not use Department- or Contractor-owned RAP if the decantation value exceeds 5% and the plasticity index is greater than 8. Read the entire page →
From page 174... ... 340 219 Table 5 Allowable Substitute PG Binders and Maximum Recycled Binder Ratios Originally Specified PG Binder Allowable Substitute PG Binder Maximum Ratio of Recycled Binder1 to Total Binder (%) Surface Intermediate Base HMA 76-222 70-22 or 64-22 20.0 20.0 20.0 70-28 or 64-28 30.0 35.0 40.0 70-222 64-22 20.0 20.0 20.0 64-28 or 58-28 30.0 35.0 40.0 64-222 58-28 30.0 35.0 40.0 76-282 70-28 or 64-28 20.0 20.0 20.0 64-34 30.0 35.0 40.0 70-282 64-28 or 58-28 20.0 20.0 20.0 64-34 or 58-34 30.0 35.0 40.0 64-282 58-28 20.0 20.0 20.0 58-34 30.0 35.0 40.0 WMA3 76-222 70-22 or 64-22 30.0 35.0 40.0 70-222 64-22 or 58-28 30.0 35.0 40.0 64-224 58-28 30.0 35.0 40.0 76-282 70-28 or 64-28 30.0 35.0 40.0 70-282 64-28 or 58-28 30.0 35.0 40.0 64-284 58-28 30.0 35.0 40.0 1. Read the entire page →
From page 175... ... 340 220 Table 6 Test Methods, Test Responsibility, and Minimum Certification Levels Test Description Test Method Contractor Engineer Level1 1. Aggregate and Recycled Material Testing Sampling Tex-221-F   1A Dry sieve Tex-200-F, Part I   1A Washed sieve Tex-200-F, Part II   1A Deleterious material Tex-217-F, Parts I & III   1A Decantation Tex-217-F, Part II   1A Los Angeles abrasion Tex-410-A  TxDOT Magnesium sulfate soundness Tex-411-A  TxDOT Micro-Deval abrasion Tex-461-A  2 Crushed face count Tex-460-A   2 Flat and elongated particles Tex-280-F   2 Linear shrinkage Tex-107-E   2 Sand equivalent Tex-203-F   2 Organic impurities Tex-408-A   2 2. Read the entire page →
From page 176... ... 340 221 The maximum allowable time for the Engineer to exchange test data with the Contractor is as given in Table 7 unless otherwise approved. The Engineer will immediately report to the Contractor any test result that requires suspension of production or placement or that fails to meet the specification requirements. Read the entire page →
From page 177... ... 340 222  results of all applicable tests;  the mixing and molding temperatures;  the signature of the Level 2 person or persons that performed the design;  the date the mixture design was performed; and  a unique identification number for the mixture design. Table 8 Master Gradation Limits (% Passing by Weight or Volume) Read the entire page →
From page 178... ... 340 223 for hot-mix production. JMF1 is the original laboratory mixture design used to produce the trial batch. Read the entire page →
From page 179... ... 340 224 discernible increments) in accordance with Item 320, "Equipment for Asphalt Concrete Pavement," unless otherwise directed. Read the entire page →
From page 180... ... 340 225 Table 12 Compacted Lift Thickness and Required Core Height Mixture Type Compacted Lift Thickness Guidelines Minimum Untrimmed Core Height (in.) Eligible for Testing Minimum (in.) Read the entire page →
From page 181... ... 340 226 Allow the compacted pavement to cool to 160°F or lower before opening to traffic unless otherwise directed. Sprinkle the finished mat with water or limewater, when directed, to expedite opening the roadway to traffic. Read the entire page →
From page 182... ... 340 227 4.8.3.2. Hamburg Wheel Test. Read the entire page →
From page 183... ... 340 228 The Engineer may have the cores transported back to the Department's laboratory at the HMA plant via the Contractor's haul truck or other designated vehicle. In such cases where the cores will be out of the Engineer's possession during transport, the Engineer will use Department-provided security bags and the Roadway Core Custody protocol located at http://www.txdot.gov/business/specifications.htm to provide a secure means and process that protects the integrity of the cores during transport. Read the entire page →
From page 184... ... 340 229 6. PAYMENT The work performed and materials furnished in accordance with this Item and measured as provided under Section 340.5., "Measurement," will be paid for at the unit bid price for "Dense Graded Hot-Mix Asphalt (SQ) Read the entire page →
From page 185... ... 341 230 Item 341 Dense-Graded Hot-Mix Asphalt 1. DESCRIPTION Construct a hot-mix asphalt (HMA) Read the entire page →
From page 186... ... 341 231 other than travel lanes when shown on the plans. The SAC for sources on the Department's Aggregate Quality Monitoring Program (AQMP) Read the entire page →
From page 187... ... 341 232 from organic impurities. The Engineer may test the fine aggregate in accordance with Tex-408-A to verify the material is free from organic impurities. Read the entire page →
From page 189... ... 341 234 Perform any necessary tests to ensure Contractor- or Department-owned RAP is appropriate for use. The Department will not perform any tests or assume any liability for the quality of the Department-owned RAP unless otherwise shown on the plans. Read the entire page →
From page 190... ... 341 235 2.8. Substitute Binders. Read the entire page →
From page 191... ... 341 236 Table 6 Test Methods, Test Responsibility, and Minimum Certification Levels Test Description Test Method Contractor Engineer Level1 1. Aggregate and Recycled Material Testing Sampling Tex-221-F   1A Dry sieve Tex-200-F, Part I   1A Washed sieve Tex-200-F, Part II   1A Deleterious material Tex-217-F, Parts I & III   1A Decantation Tex-217-F, Part II   1A Los Angeles abrasion Tex-410-A  TxDOT Magnesium sulfate soundness Tex-411-A  TxDOT Micro-Deval abrasion Tex-461-A  2 Crushed face count Tex-460-A   2 Flat and elongated particles Tex-280-F   2 Linear shrinkage Tex-107-E   2 Sand equivalent Tex-203-F   2 Organic impurities Tex-408-A   2 2. Read the entire page →
From page 192... ... 341 237 4.2. Reporting and Responsibilities. Read the entire page →
From page 193... ... 341 238 4.3. Quality Control Plan (QCP) Read the entire page →
From page 194... ... 341 239 in Tex-204-F, Part IV, when using a SGC. Design the mixture to meet the requirements listed in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, and 10. Read the entire page →
From page 195... ... 341 240 Table 9 Laboratory Mixture Design Properties Mixture Property Test Method Requirement Target laboratory-molded density, % (TGC) Tex-207-F 96.51 Design gyrations (Ndesign for SGC) Read the entire page →
From page 196... ... 341 241 4.4.2.1.5. Supplying Asphalt. Read the entire page →
From page 197... ... 341 242 Notify the Engineer if electing to proceed without Hamburg Wheel test results from the trial batch. Note that the Engineer may require up to the entire sublot of any mixture failing the Hamburg Wheel test to be removed and replaced at the Contractor's expense. Read the entire page →
From page 198... ... 341 243  all required materials including aggregates, asphalt, additives, and recycled materials; and  the mixture specifications. The Engineer will grant the Contractor conditional approval of JMF1 if the information provided on the paper copy of JMF1 indicates that the Contractor's mixture design meets the specifications. Read the entire page →
From page 199... ... 341 244 4.4.2.2.9. Approval of JMF3 and Subsequent JMF Changes. Read the entire page →
From page 200... ... 341 245 directed. Ensure that all finished surfaces will drain properly. Read the entire page →
From page 201... ... 341 246 4.7.3.1.1. Thermal Segregation. Read the entire page →
From page 202... ... 341 247 remove any roller marks. Use only water or an approved release agent on rollers, tamps, and other compaction equipment unless otherwise directed. Read the entire page →
From page 203... ... 341 248 confirm the indirect tensile strength does not exceed 200 psi. Take corrective action to bring the mixture within specification compliance if the indirect tensile strength exceeds 200 psi unless otherwise directed. Read the entire page →
From page 204... ... 341 249 Table 14 Production and Placement Testing Frequency Description Test Method Minimum Contractor Testing Frequency Minimum Engineer Testing Frequency Individual % retained for #8 sieve and larger Tex-200-F or Tex-236-F 1 per sublot 1 per 12 sublots1 Individual % retained for sieves smaller than #8 and larger than #200 % passing the #200 sieve Laboratory-molded density Tex-207-F N/A 1 per sublot1 Laboratory-molded bulk specific gravity In-place air voids VMA Tex-204-F Segregation (density profile) 2 Tex-207-F, Part V 1 per sublot 1 per project Longitudinal joint density Tex-207-F, Part VII Moisture content Tex-212-F, Part II When directed Theoretical maximum specific (Rice) Read the entire page →
From page 205... ... 341 250 Suspend production and shipment of the mixture if the Engineer's VMA result is more than 0.5% below the minimum VMA requirement for production listed in Table 8. In addition to suspending production, the Engineer may require removal and replacement or may allow the sublot to be left in place without payment. Read the entire page →
From page 206... ... 341 251 4.9.3.2. Placement Sampling. Read the entire page →
From page 207... ... 341 252 4.9.3.3. Placement Testing. Read the entire page →
From page 208... ... 341 253 4.9.3.3.3.2. Record Tests. Read the entire page →
From page 209... ... 341 254  when a thermal imaging system is not used, the Engineer may perform segregation (density profiles) and thermal profiles in accordance with the specification. Read the entire page →
From page 210... ... 341 255 Table 16 Production Pay Adjustment Factors for Laboratory-Molded Density1 Absolute Deviation from Target Laboratory-Molded Density Production Pay Adjustment Factor (Target Laboratory-Molded Density) 0.0 1.050 0.1 1.050 0.2 1.050 0.3 1.044 0.4 1.038 0.5 1.031 0.6 1.025 0.7 1.019 0.8 1.013 0.9 1.006 1.0 1.000 1.1 0.965 1.2 0.930 1.3 0.895 1.4 0.860 1.5 0.825 1.6 0.790 1.7 0.755 1.8 0.720 > 1.8 Remove and replace 1. Read the entire page →
From page 211... ... 341 256 Table 17 Placement Pay Adjustment Factors for In-Place Air Voids In-Place Air Voids Placement Pay Adjustment Factor In-Place Air Voids Placement Pay Adjustment Factor < 2.7 Remove and Replace 6.4 1.042 2.7 0.710 6.5 1.040 2.8 0.740 6.6 1.038 2.9 0.770 6.7 1.036 3.0 0.800 6.8 1.034 3.1 0.830 6.9 1.032 3.2 0.860 7.0 1.030 3.3 0.890 7.1 1.028 3.4 0.920 7.2 1.026 3.5 0.950 7.3 1.024 3.6 0.980 7.4 1.022 3.7 0.998 7.5 1.020 3.8 1.002 7.6 1.018 3.9 1.006 7.7 1.016 4.0 1.010 7.8 1.014 4.1 1.014 7.9 1.012 4.2 1.018 8.0 1.010 4.3 1.022 8.1 1.008 4.4 1.026 8.2 1.006 4.5 1.030 8.3 1.004 4.6 1.034 8.4 1.002 4.7 1.038 8.5 1.000 4.8 1.042 8.6 0.998 4.9 1.046 8.7 0.996 5.0 1.050 8.8 0.994 5.1 1.050 8.9 0.992 5.2 1.050 9.0 0.990 5.3 1.050 9.1 0.960 5.4 1.050 9.2 0.930 5.5 1.050 9.3 0.900 5.6 1.050 9.4 0.870 5.7 1.050 9.5 0.840 5.8 1.050 9.6 0.810 5.9 1.050 9.7 0.780 6.0 1.050 9.8 0.750 6.1 1.048 9.9 0.720 6.2 1.046 > 9.9 Remove and Replace 6.3 1.044 6.2.1. Payment for Incomplete Placement Lots. Read the entire page →
From page 212... ... 341 257 failing sublot, or the Engineer may allow the sublot to be left in place without payment. The Engineer may also accept the sublot in accordance with Section 5.3.1., "Acceptance of Defective or Unauthorized Work." Replacement material meeting the requirements of this Item will be paid for in accordance with this Section. Read the entire page →
From page 213... ... 342 258 Item 342 Permeable Friction Course (PFC) Read the entire page →
From page 214... ... 342 259 2.1.1.1. Blending Class A and Class B Aggregates. Read the entire page →
From page 215... ... 342 260 2.3. Asphalt Binder. Read the entire page →
From page 216... ... 342 261 Department-approved WMA additives or processes may be used to facilitate mixing and compaction of HMA produced at target discharge temperatures above 275°F; however, such mixtures will not be defined as WMA. Read the entire page →
From page 217... ... 342 262 felt paper. Determine the deleterious content of RAS material for mixture design purposes in accordance with Tex-217-F, Part III. Read the entire page →
From page 218... ... 342 263 Table 3 Test Methods, Test Responsibility, and Minimum Certification Levels Test Description Test Method Contractor Engineer Level1 1. Aggregate and Recycled Material Testing Sampling Tex-221-F   1A Dry sieve Tex-200-F, Part I   1A Washed sieve Tex-200-F, Part II   1A Deleterious material Tex-217-F, Parts I & III   1A Decantation Tex-217-F, Part II   1A Los Angeles abrasion Tex-410-A  TxDOT Magnesium sulfate soundness Tex-411-A  TxDOT Micro-Deval abrasion Tex-461-A  2 Crushed face count Tex-460-A   2 Flat and elongated particles Tex-280-F   2 2. Read the entire page →
From page 219... ... 342 264 discretion of the Engineer in accordance with Article 5.3., "Conformity with Plans, Specifications, and Special Provisions." Use the procedures described in Tex-233-F to plot the results of all production and placement testing, when directed. Update the control charts as soon as test results for each sublot become available. Read the entire page →
From page 220... ... 342 265  paver operations (e.g., operation of wings, height of mixture in auger chamber) to avoid physical and thermal segregation and other surface irregularities; and  procedures to construct quality longitudinal and transverse joints. Read the entire page →
From page 221... ... 342 266 Table 4 Master Gradation Limits (% Passing by Weight or Volume) and Laboratory Mixture Design Properties Sieve Size PG 76 Mixtures A-R Mixtures Test Procedure Fine (PFC-F) Read the entire page →
From page 222... ... 342 267 Provide 25,000 g of the laboratory mixture and request that the Department perform the Overlay test. The Engineer will be allowed 10 working days to provide the Contractor with Hamburg Wheel and Overlay test results on the laboratory mixture design. Read the entire page →
From page 223... ... 342 268 4.4.2.1.17. Development of JMF3. Read the entire page →
From page 224... ... 342 269 Unless waived, the Engineer will determine the Micro-Deval abrasion loss in accordance with Section 342.2.1.1.2., "Micro-Deval Abrasion." If the Engineer's test results are pending after 2 working days, conditional approval of JMF1 will still be granted within 2 working days of receiving JMF1. When the Engineer's test results become available, they will be used for specification compliance. Read the entire page →
From page 225... ... 342 270 Maintain the in-line measuring device when A-R binder is specified to verify the A-R binder viscosity between 2,500 and 4,000 centipoise at 350°F unless otherwise approved. Record A-R binder viscosity at least once per hour and provide the Engineer with a daily summary unless otherwise directed. Read the entire page →
From page 226... ... 342 271 4.7.1. Weather Conditions. Read the entire page →
From page 227... ... 342 272 4.7.3.2. Windrow Operations. Read the entire page →
From page 228... ... 342 273 tolerances listed in Table 5 unless otherwise allowed. When production is suspended, the Engineer will allow production to resume when test results or other information indicates the next mixture produced will be within the operational tolerances. Read the entire page →
From page 229... ... 342 274 5.2. Aggregate. Read the entire page →
From page 230... ... 346 303 Item 346 Stone-Matrix Asphalt 1. DESCRIPTION Construct a hot-mix asphalt (HMA) Read the entire page →
From page 231... ... 346 304 other than travel lanes when shown on the plans. The SAC for sources on the Department's Aggregate Quality Monitoring Program (AQMP) Read the entire page →
From page 232... ... 346 305 from organic impurities. The Engineer may test the fine aggregate in accordance with Tex-408-A to verify the material is free from organic impurities. Read the entire page →
From page 233... ... 346 306 2.4.1. Performance-Graded (PG) Read the entire page →
From page 234... ... 346 307 not exceed the percentages shown in Table 4 during mixture design and HMA production when RAP or RAS is used. Use a separate cold feed bin for each stockpile of RAP and RAS during HMA production. Read the entire page →
From page 235... ... 346 308 with any hazardous materials. Use RAS from shingle sources on the Department's MPL. Read the entire page →
From page 236... ... 346 309 Table 5 Test Methods, Test Responsibility, and Minimum Certification Levels Test Description Test Method Contractor Engineer Level1 1. Aggregate and Recycled Material Testing Sampling Tex-221-F   1A Dry sieve Tex-200-F, Part I   1A Washed sieve Tex-200-F, Part II   1A Deleterious material Tex-217-F, Parts I & III   1A Decantation Tex-217-F, Part II   1A Los Angeles abrasion Tex-410-A  TxDOT Magnesium sulfate soundness Tex-411-A  TxDOT Micro-Deval abrasion Tex-461-A  2 Crushed face count Tex-460-A   2 Flat and elongated particles Tex-280-F   2 Linear shrinkage Tex-107-E   2 Sand equivalent Tex-203-F   2 Organic impurities Tex-408-A   2 2. Read the entire page →
From page 237... ... 346 310 http://www.txdot.gov/inside-txdot/forms-publications/consultants-contractors/forms/site-manager.html or from the Engineer. The Engineer and the Contractor will provide any available test results to the other party when requested. Read the entire page →
From page 238... ... 346 311 4.3. Quality Control Plan (QCP) Read the entire page →
From page 239... ... 346 312 Design SMA or SMAR mixtures using a Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC) at 50 gyrations as the design number of gyrations (Ndesign) Read the entire page →
From page 240... ... 346 313 Table 8 Laboratory Mixture Design Properties Mixture Property SMA Mixtures SMAR Mixtures Test Procedure Design gyrations, (Ndesign) 1 50 50 Tex-241-F Target laboratory-molded density, % 96.0 96.0 Tex-207-F Asphalt binder content, % 6.0-7.0 7.0-10.0 – Drain-down, % 0.10 Max 0.10 Max Tex-235-F Fiber content, % by wt. Read the entire page →
From page 241... ... 346 314 used for the current mixture design, if the mixture design and ignition oven are the same as previously used unless otherwise directed. Read the entire page →
From page 242... ... 346 315 4.4.2.1.16. Development of JMF3. Read the entire page →
From page 243... ... 346 316 The Engineer will grant the Contractor conditional approval of JMF1 if the information provided on the paper copy of JMF1 indicates that the Contractor's mixture design meets the specifications. When the Contractor does not provide Hamburg Wheel test results with laboratory mixture design, 10 working days are allowed for conditional approval of JMF1. Read the entire page →
From page 244... ... 346 317 values. The Engineer may require up to the entire sublot of any mixture failing the Hamburg Wheel test be removed and replaced at the Contractor's expense. Read the entire page →
From page 245... ... 346 318 pavement edges. Place the mixture to meet the typical section requirements and produce a smooth, finished surface with a uniform appearance and texture. Read the entire page →
From page 246... ... 346 319 4.7.3.1.2. Thermal Imaging System. Read the entire page →
From page 247... ... 346 320 Use tamps to thoroughly compact the edges of the pavement along curbs, headers, and similar structures and in locations that will not allow thorough compaction with rollers. The Engineer may require rolling with a trench roller on widened areas, in trenches, and in other limited areas. Read the entire page →
From page 248... ... 346 321 4.9.2.2. Production Sampling. Read the entire page →
From page 249... ... 346 322 that results from Tex-236-F are not reliable before requesting permission to use an alternate method unless otherwise directed. Use the applicable test procedure as directed if an alternate test method is allowed. Read the entire page →
From page 250... ... 346 323 4.9.2.4.3. Voids in Mineral Aggregates (VMA) Read the entire page →
From page 251... ... 346 324 4.9.3.1.4. Miscellaneous Areas. Read the entire page →
From page 252... ... 346 325 Instead of the Contractor trimming the cores on-site immediately after coring, the Engineer and the Contractor may mutually agree to have the trimming operations performed at an alternate location such as a field laboratory or other similar location. In such cases, the Engineer will take possession of the cores immediately after they are obtained from the roadway and will retain custody of the cores until testing is completed. Read the entire page →
From page 253... ... 346 326 Table 12 Segregation (Density Profile) Acceptance Criteria Mixture Type Maximum Allowable Density Range (Highest to Lowest) Read the entire page →
From page 254... ... 346 327 For exempt production, the Contractor is relieved of all production and placement sampling and testing requirements and the production and placement pay factors are 1.000. All other specification requirements apply and the Engineer will perform acceptance tests for production and placement listed in Table 14 when 100 tons or more per day are produced. Read the entire page →
From page 255... ... 346 328 Table 13 Production Pay Adjustment Factors for Laboratory-Molded Density1 Absolute Deviation from Target Laboratory-Molded Density Production Pay Adjustment Factor (Target Laboratory-Molded Density) 0.0 1.100 0.1 1.100 0.2 1.100 0.3 1.086 0.4 1.075 0.5 1.063 0.6 1.050 0.7 1.038 0.8 1.025 0.9 1.013 1.0 1.000 1.1 0.900 1.2 0.800 1.3 0.700 > 1.3 Remove and replace 1. Read the entire page →
From page 256... ... 346 329 Table 14 Placement Pay Adjustment Factors for In-Place Air Voids In-Place Air Voids Placement Pay Adjustment Factor In-Place Air Voids Placement Pay Adjustment Factor < 2.7 Remove and Replace 5.4 1.080 2.7 0.710 5.5 1.075 2.8 0.740 5.6 1.070 2.9 0.770 5.7 1.065 3.0 0.800 5.8 1.060 3.1 0.830 5.9 1.055 3.2 0.860 6.0 1.050 3.3 0.890 6.1 1.045 3.4 0.920 6.2 1.040 3.5 0.950 6.3 1.035 3.6 0.980 6.4 1.030 3.7 1.010 6.5 1.025 3.8 1.040 6.6 1.020 3.9 1.070 6.7 1.015 4.0 1.100 6.8 1.010 4.1 1.100 6.9 1.005 4.2 1.100 7.0 1.000 4.3 1.100 7.1 0.970 4.4 1.100 7.2 0.940 4.5 1.100 7.3 0.910 4.6 1.100 7.4 0.880 4.7 1.100 7.5 0.850 4.8 1.100 7.6 0.820 4.9 1.100 7.7 0.790 5.0 1.100 7.8 0.760 5.1 1.095 7.9 0.730 5.2 1.090 8.0 0.700 5.3 1.085 > 8.0 Remove and Replace 6.2.1. Payment for Incomplete Placement Lots. Read the entire page →
From page 257... ... 346 330 6.3. Total Adjusted Pay Calculation. Read the entire page →
From page 258... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 1 of 17 January 1, 2012 SECTION 02741 HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) Read the entire page →
From page 259... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 2 of 17 January 1, 2012 G Read the entire page →
From page 260... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 3 of 17 January 1, 2012 D Read the entire page →
From page 261... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 4 of 17 January 1, 2012 a. Read the entire page →
From page 262... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 5 of 17 January 1, 2012 3. Read the entire page →
From page 263... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 6 of 17 January 1, 2012 7. Read the entire page →
From page 264... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 7 of 17 January 1, 2012 Table 2 Upper and Lower Limit Determination Parameter UL and LL ¾ inch sieve for 1 inch HMA ½ inch sieve for ¾ inch HMA ⅜ inch sieve for ½ inch HMA No. Read the entire page →
From page 265... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 8 of 17 January 1, 2012 Table 3 Quality Index Values for Estimating Percent Within Limits PU/PL n=3 n=4 n=5 n=6 n=7 n=8 n=10 n=12 n=15 n=20 100 1.16 1.50 1.75 1.91 2.06 2.15 2.29 2.35 2.47 2.56 99 1.16 1.47 1.68 1.79 1.89 1.95 2.04 2.09 2.14 2.19 98 1.15 1.44 1.61 1.70 1.77 1.80 1.86 1.89 1.93 1.97 97 1.15 1.41 1.55 1.62 1.67 1.69 1.74 1.77 1.80 1.82 96 1.15 1.38 1.49 1.55 1.59 1.61 1.64 1.66 1.69 1.70 95 1.14 1.35 1.45 1.49 1.52 1.54 1.56 1.57 1.59 1.61 94 1.13 1.32 1.40 1.44 1.46 1.47 1.49 1.50 1.51 1.53 93 1.12 1.29 1.36 1.38 1.40 1.41 1.43 1.43 1.44 1.46 92 1.11 1.26 1.31 1.33 1.35 1.36 1.37 1.37 1.38 1.39 91 1.10 1.23 1.27 1.29 1.30 1.31 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.33 90 1.09 1.20 1.23 1.24 1.25 1.25 1.26 1.26 1.27 1.27 89 1.08 1.17 1.20 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.22 1.22 88 1.07 1.14 1.16 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.17 87 1.06 1.11 1.12. Read the entire page →
From page 266... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 9 of 17 January 1, 2012 Table 4 Definitions, Abbreviations, and Formulas for Acceptance Term Explanation Target Value (TV) Read the entire page →
From page 267... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 10 of 17 January 1, 2012 PART 2 PRODUCTS 2.1 ASPHALT BINDER A Read the entire page →
From page 268... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 11 of 17 January 1, 2012 C Read the entire page →
From page 269... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 12 of 17 January 1, 2012 2.6 VOLUMETRIC DESIGN A Read the entire page →
From page 270... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 13 of 17 January 1, 2012 Table 8 Volumetric Design Requirements HMA design mixing and compaction temperatures Provided by the Engineer Dust Proportion Range 0.6 - 1.40 Voids in Mineral Aggregate (VMA) Read the entire page →
From page 271... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 14 of 17 January 1, 2012 D Read the entire page →
From page 272... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 15 of 17 January 1, 2012 3.4 LABORATORY CORRELATION A Read the entire page →
From page 273... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 16 of 17 January 1, 2012 3.6 SURFACE PLACEMENT A Read the entire page →
From page 274... ... Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) 02741 – 17 of 17 January 1, 2012 3.8 LIMITATIONS A Read the entire page →
From page 275... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 1 of 21 January 1, 2012 SECTION 02745 ASPHALT MATERIAL PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 SECTION INCLUDES A Asphalt materials 1.2 RELATED SECTIONS Not Used 1.3 REFERENCES A Read the entire page →
From page 276... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 2 of 21 January 1, 2012 P AASHTO T 228: Specific Gravity of Semi-Solid Asphalt Materials Q Read the entire page →
From page 277... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 3 of 21 January 1, 2012 GG. UDOT Quality Management Plan 1.4 DEFINITIONS Not Used 1.5 SUBMITTALS A Read the entire page →
From page 278... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 4 of 21 January 1, 2012 1.9 PAYMENT PROCEDURES A Price adjustments for asphalt binder and liquid asphalt including chip-seal emulsions and cut-backs. Read the entire page →
From page 279... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 5 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 1 PG58-34 Original Binder Dynamic Shear Rheometer, AASHTO T 315 @ 58° C, G* , kPa @ 58° C, phase angle, degrees Rotational Viscometer, AASHTO T 316 @ 135° C, Pa.s Flash Point, AASHTO T 48 °C RTFO Residue, AASHTO T 240 Dynamic Shear Rheometer, AASHTO T 315 @ 58° C, G* Read the entire page →
From page 280... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 6 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 3 PG64-34 Original Binder Dynamic Shear Rheometer, AASHTO T 315 @ 64° C, G* , kPa @ 64° C, phase angle, degrees Rotational Viscometer, AASHTO T 316 @ 135° C, Pa.s Flash Point, AASHTO T 48 °C RTFO Residue, AASHTO T-240 Dynamic Shear Rheometer, AASHTO T 315 @ 64° C, G* Read the entire page →
From page 281... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 7 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 5 PG70-28 Original Binder Dynamic Shear Rheometer, AASHTO T 315 @ 70° C, G* , kPa @ 70° C, phase angle, degrees Rotational Viscometer, AASHTO T 316 @ 135° C, Pa.s Flash Point, AASHTO T 48 °C RTFO Residue, AASHTO T 240 Dynamic Shear Rheometer, AASHTO T 315 @ 70° C, G* Read the entire page →
From page 282... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 8 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 7 PG76-22 Original Binder Dynamic Shear Rheometer, AASHTO T 315 @ 76° C, G* , kPa @ 76° C, phase angle, degrees Rotational Viscometer, AASHTO T 316 @ 135° C, Pa.s Flash Point, AASHTO T 48 °C RTFO Residue, AASHTO T 240 Dynamic Shear Rheometer, AASHTO T 315 @ 76° C, G* Read the entire page →
From page 283... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 9 of 21 January 1, 2012 2.2 ASPHALTIC CEMENT, LIQUID ASPHALTS, AND REJUVENATING AGENTS A Refer to AASHTO M 226, Table 2 with the following modifications: 1. Read the entire page →
From page 284... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 10 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 9 Cationic Rapid Setting Emulsified Polymerized Asphalt (CRS-2P) Tests Test Method Min. Read the entire page →
From page 285... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 11 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 10 Latex Modified Cationic Rapid Setting Emulsified Asphalt (LMCRS-2) Tests Test Method Min. Read the entire page →
From page 286... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 12 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 11 Cationic Medium Setting Emulsified Asphalt (CMS-2S) Tests Test Method Specification Emulsion Viscosity, SF, 122º F (50º C) Read the entire page →
From page 287... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 13 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 13 High Float Medium Setting Emulsified Polymerized Asphalt (HFMS-2P) Read the entire page →
From page 288... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 14 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 14 High Float Medium Setting Emulsified Polymerized Asphalt (HFMS-2SP) Read the entire page →
From page 289... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 15 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 15 High Float Rapid Setting Emulsified Polymerized Asphalt (HFRS-2P) Read the entire page →
From page 290... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 16 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 17 Emulsified Type A Asphalt Pavement Rejuvenating Agent Concentrate Property Test Method Limits Viscosity, SF, 77º F (25º C) , s AASHTO T 59 15 Min 40 Max Residue , percent W (a) Read the entire page →
From page 291... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 17 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 18 Emulsified Type B Asphalt Pavement Rejuvenating Agent Concentrate Tests Test Method Limits Viscosity, SF, 77º F (25º C) , s AASHTO T 59 25 - 150 Residue, percent W AASHTO T 59 (mod) Read the entire page →
From page 292... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 18 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 19 Emulsified Type B Modified Asphalt Pavement Rejuvenating Agent Concentrate Property Test Method Limits Viscosity, SF, 77º F (25º C) , s AASHTO T 59 50 - 200 Residue(a) Read the entire page →
From page 293... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 19 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 20 Emulsified Type C Asphalt Pavement Rejuvenating Agent Concentrate Property Test Method Limits Viscosity, SF, 77º F (25º C) , s AASHTO T 59 10 - 100 Residue (a) Read the entire page →
From page 294... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 20 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 21 Emulsified Type D Asphalt Pavement Rejuvenating Agent Concentrate Property Test Method Limits Viscosity, SF, 77º F (25º C) , s AASHTO T 59 30 - 90 Residue, (b) Read the entire page →
From page 295... ... Asphalt Material 02745 – Page 21 of 21 January 1, 2012 Table 22 Hot-Pour Bituminous Concrete Crack Sealant Application Properties Workability Pour readily and penetrate 0.25 inch and wider cracks for the entire application temperature range recommended by the manufacturer. Curing No tracking caused by normal traffic after 45 minutes from application. Read the entire page →
From page 296... ... Abbreviations and acronyms used without definitions in TRB publications: A4A Airlines for America AAAE American Association of Airport Executives AASHO American Association of State Highway Officials AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ACI–NA Airports Council International–North America ACRP Airport Cooperative Research Program ADA Americans with Disabilities Act APTA American Public Transportation Association ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials ATA American Trucking Associations CTAA Community Transportation Association of America CTBSSP Commercial Truck and Bus Safety Synthesis Program DHS Department of Homeland Security DOE Department of Energy EPA Environmental Protection Agency FAA Federal Aviation Administration FAST Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (2015) FHWA Federal Highway Administration FMCSA Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration HMCRP Hazardous Materials Cooperative Research Program IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (2012) Read the entire page →
From page 297... ... TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 5 0 0 F ifth S tre e t, N W W a s h in g to n , D C 2 0 0 0 1 A D D R ESS SER VICE R EQ UESTED NO N-PRO FIT O RG . Read the entire page →

From page 91...

... Appendix d Sample documents Related to performance Testing as part of Specifications for Asphalt Mixtures (electronic format only, available online) Appendix D Sample Documents Related to Performance Testing as Part of Specifications for Asphalt Mixtures (electronic format only, available online)