Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 29-40

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 29...
... 27 CHAPTER FOUR HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC FACTORS INTRODUCTION Hydrologic and hydraulic factors are extremely important in the design of embankments subjected to flooding. These factors control the volume of water that is likely to flood the embankment's surroundings, the duration of the flood, and the water surface elevation.
From page 30...
... 28 FIGURE 50 Flood frequency curve obtained from a measured flow discharge hydrograph (Briaud 2013)
From page 31...
... 29 tion of the hydraulic radius, the following relationship for a rectangular channel cross section appears reasonable (Briaud et al.
From page 32...
... 30 Coastal Parameters The parameters to be considered in a coastal embankment subject to hydrodynamic forces depend on the nature of the flow. Two failure modes that cause surficial erosion were identified in chapter two: overtopping failure mode with three flow mechanisms ("Overtopping" in chapter two)
From page 33...
... 31 Regressions equations give the peak flow QT in a river for a given return period T The equations are based on databases of peak flow obtained from gaged stations.
From page 34...
... 32 • Soil type information: NRCS Web Soil Survey Web Application (http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/) • Precipitation information: National Weather Service (http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/)
From page 35...
... 33 Additional information sources include the following: • Jones et al.
From page 36...
... 34 • For the submerged flow case (high tailwater) , the difference in elevation between the upstream water level and the tailwater level is not large, the embankment is submerged, and the modified equation is (4.14)
From page 37...
... 35 Coastal Surge Overtopping Coefficient Based on Hughes (2008) , it appears appropriate to plug a discharge coefficient value Cf of 0.5443 into the following equation: (4.16)
From page 38...
... 36 CASE II: WAVE OVERTOPPING Advances on the determination of overtopping flow parameters have been made based on small-scale and large-scale experiments on levees carried out in Europe (Schüttrumpf et al. 2002; van Gent 2002; Schüttrumpf and Oumeraci 2005)
From page 39...
... 37 Where: – hA2% is the peak flow depth exceeded by 2% of the waves, – Hs is the significant wave height [= Hmo] , – CAh2% is an empirical depth coefficient (Table 10)
From page 40...
... 38 No published values of Fanning's coefficient exist for armored alternatives. A fist attempt to approximate the Fanning factor was presented by Henderson (1966)

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.