Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

3 Innovation Beyond R&D and Conventional Input Measures
Pages 25-46

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 25...
... -- conducted by the Census Bureau through an interagency agreement with the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES) -- asks firms in manufacturing and service industries for information about newly introduced or improved products and processes, and about purchased R&D inflows and outflows, revenue from the sale of patents and patent licensing, and a number of activities related to intellectual property (IP)
From page 26...
... innovations, new-to-the-firm innovations, and significantly improved products during the 3-year reference period. The CIS and DoIL surveys generated the following estimates of the share of manufacturing firms introducing innovations for the 2007-2009 period in selected European countries and the United States: New-to-Firm Innovation – Germany: 49% 1While Arora et al.
From page 27...
... In order to identify innovating firms, the DoIL survey asked: "In 2009, have you earned revenue from any new or significantly improved goods or services in [INDUSTRY] introduced since 2007, where ‘new' means new to your firm?
From page 28...
... Analysts can set the criteria -- for example, the percentage of sales -- for what is considered important. Summary statistics reveal an NTM innovation rate in the United States of about 16 percent for the 2007-2009 period across all manufacturing industries, with innovation occurring disproportionately among large firms (38% versus 23% and 13%, respectively, for medium and small firms)
From page 29...
... Cohen used Figure 3-1 to present findings about the percentage of business unit sales from focal innovation. The vertical axis is the percent age of innovating firms, and the horizontal axis indicates the percentage of sales accounted for by that group of innovating firms.
From page 30...
... Y axis is the percentage of innovating firms in each category of the x axis. X axis categorizes other kinds of innovations, further classified by percentage of sales accounted for by the focal innovation (< 50% sales, > 50% sales)
From page 31...
... At about this same time, Arora noted, many statistical agencies began developing their models of innovation measurement, which influenced methodological decisions. Arora noted that fast-forwarding to more recent years, data from the National Science Foundation (see Figure 3-3)
From page 32...
... Given the diminishing role of internal research in large private-sector companies, understanding the mechanisms of external knowledge production and spillovers from universities, startups, and government sources, as well as non-U.S. sources of invention and knowledge, is becoming increasingly important.5 Regarding the organizations doing the inventing, in the United States, 5Additionally, some companies are moving away from introducing new products and into financial engineering, globalization, and buying businesses (where innovations may be harder to detect and measure)
From page 33...
... The National Science Board Science and Engineering Indicators publications provide information about the extent to which invention originates from science by showing the percentage of patents citing science and engineering literature.6 In open discussion, commenting on external sources of inventions (and inventive labor) , Alfonso Gambardella (Bocconi University)
From page 34...
... RESEARCH USING LONGITUDINAL BUSINESS DATA AND OTHER STATISTICAL AGENCY DATA THAT HELP MEASURE INNOVATION Javier Miranda (U.S. Census Bureau)
From page 35...
... However, if the decline has been in transformational entrepre neurs creating innovative businesses, then it would be a greater concern. Research by Miranda and his colleagues (e.g., Decker et al., 2015)
From page 36...
... Likewise, as shown in Figure 3-5, the decline in the share of employment in high tech jobs accounted for by young firms began in 2000 and, by 2011, it was about half of what it had been a decade earlier. The decline coincides with a slowdown in productivity growth as measured using official statistics (or, Miranda pointed out, using Fernald's numbers cited by Sichel above)
From page 37...
... As in past collaborations between agencies, such as between NCSES and Bureau of Economic Analysis in developing new data for adding R&D and intangibles into the National Income and Product Accounts, questions of data confidentiality are regularly dealt with. DESIGN INNOVATION AS AN ALTERNATIVE OR COMPLEMENT TO R&D Bruce Tether (University of Manchester)
From page 38...
... The modern view of design is that it brings together creativity through insights and integration of ideas. Tether suggested a good example is IDEO, a global design firm, which created a program for Bank of America called "Keep the Change" to entice people to save more (every time customers buy something with their debit card, the bank rounds up the purchase to the nearest dollar and transfers the difference from their checking into a savings account)
From page 39...
... . SOURCE: Workshop presentation by Bruce Tether, May 19, 2016; data from Innobarometer 2015 (Montresor and Vezzani, 2015)
From page 40...
... Work by Galindo-Rueda and Millot (2015) using the Danish CIS data reveal an increasing impact from using design more strategically.
From page 41...
... Design is important in low tech sectors and, increasingly, in services. • Among the challenges in measurement are (1)
From page 42...
... This research finds that use of robotics led to, on average, a 0.36 percentage point increase in a country's annual labor productivity growth, accounting for slightly more than one-tenth of overall GDP growth during that time. Although small, Seamans pointed out that its impact is similar in magnitude to that resulting from steam engines in the United Kingdom in the late 19th century -- and about one-tenth of the productivity growth that occurred during this time period.
From page 43...
... indicate that total annual shipments of industrial robotics began to increase rapidly around 2010, and they have nearly doubled since then.10 Similarly, beginning around 2011-2012, there was a large uptick in the number and rate of patents that cite the robot class. These trends suggest, according to Seamans, that the 0.36 percentage point contribution to productivity growth estimated by Graetz and Michaels (2015)
From page 44...
... and probability of automation by occupation. SOURCE: Workshop presentation by Rob Seamans, May 19, 2016; wage data from Bureau of Labor Statistics; probability of automation estimates from Frey and Osborne (2013)
From page 45...
... " and "Has your establishment considered using robotics instead of human labor? " In discussion, Sheryl Winston Smith (Temple University)


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.