Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 42-64

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 42...
... 43 Specific asphalt availability factors were reported by eight agencies: • 0.85 for RAS asphalt (four agencies)
From page 43...
... 44 Survey Question: For the purposes of mix designs, indicate which "philosophy" is used to establish the contribution of the recycled material asphalt. Materials 100% Available for Mix 0% ("Black Rock")
From page 44...
... 45 are tested and if RAP and RAS are combined prior to determining the asphalt content. A second question was included to determine which sieve size(s)
From page 45...
... 46 determine a correction factor (four agencies for RAP, two for RAS)
From page 46...
... 47 Not only do agencies use a range of methods for asphalt recovery, they also evaluate a range of different recycled material asphalt properties (Table 32)
From page 47...
... 48 determine RAP gradations (15 agencies after ignition oven and nine after solvent extraction)
From page 48...
... 49 Additional respondent comments noted that one agency conducts source tests when investigating polish resistance quality of the aggregate. Another agency noted that the contractor has the option to conduct these tests.
From page 49...
... 50 • Contractor may choose any of these approaches. Most of the time, the contractor selects the RAP percentage and then determines the virgin binder grade they have to use.
From page 50...
... 51 Some agencies directly measure specific gravities after ignition oven and only a few agencies measure this property after solvent extraction. The solvent extraction or the ignition oven are known to influence aggregate property test results, but are the only methods currently available for removing asphalt if an agency wants to obtain measurements, rather than estimates, of the recycled material specific gravities.
From page 51...
... 52 SAMPLE PREPARATION The steps for the preparation of materials for fabricating mix design samples are: • Sizing of aggregates and recycled materials, • Drying recycled materials prior to batching samples, • Heating (time and temperature) of materials for mixing, • Order of addition to mixing bowl, • Short-term aging before compaction, and • Compaction of samples.
From page 52...
... 53 • One agency noted they use 19 mm (¾ in.) as a maximum size because we ask that RAP be screened on a 25-mm (1-in.)
From page 53...
... 54 agency reported using from 125°F to 175°F (52°C to 80°C) for a maximum of 2 hours.
From page 54...
... 55 time in the oven to confirm the mixing temperature is reached (Table 48)
From page 55...
... 56 AASHTO Region Statistics Aggregates RAP RAS Combination RAP and RAS Heating Time, hours Northeastern Average 3.7 1.4 1.2 1.0 Std.
From page 56...
... FIGURE 25 Statistics for times and temperatures used for mixing. Survey Question: Indicate how you know the material is at required temperature for mixing.
From page 57...
... 58 Survey Question: Indicate how long materials are mixed (mixing time)
From page 58...
... 59 Survey Question: Enter the typical number of gyration(s) , NDesign, which is (are)
From page 59...
... 60 Sample Preparation -- Section Summary Sizing of Aggregates and Recycled Materials • If the contractors submit RAP samples from fractionated stockpiles, a number of agencies appear to use what is submitted as individual fractions for batching. • Definitions of coarse and fine RAP fractions vary.
From page 60...
... 61 The dust-to-asphalt ratio, air voids, and VMA criteria are more difficult to meet when there is more than 25% RAP, RAS, and a combination of RAP and RAS in the mixtures. Lower percentages of RAP can make it difficult to meet these requirements, but not as frequently.
From page 61...
... 62 At this time, only three agencies investigate trafficrelated cracking of mixtures in their state (Table 57)
From page 62...
... 63 • Mixture stiffness is evaluated using either resilient modulus or dynamic modulus, primarily for research purposes. • Cracking potential is evaluated primarily for research purposes at this time using one or more methods (DCT and SCB at low temperatures, SCB at intermediate temperatures)
From page 63...
... 64 • Virtually all of our agency mixtures employ a liquid antistripping agent with some hydrated lime used as well. • Using the proper asphalt binder and/or other additives can counteract the negative effects of increased RAP percentages.
From page 64...
... 65 Survey Question: Cracking Potential (Nonthermal Cracking) : Based on your experience, indicate your level of agreement with the following statements.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.