Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 17-21

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 17...
... 17 C H A P T E R 3 Introduction This chapter provides a summary of the incident data analysis that was done as part of the research for this manual. It also describes the railroad hazard analysis process and a protocol used in Japan to study platform safety.
From page 18...
... 18 Manual to Improve Rail Transit Safety at Platform/Vehicle and Platform/Guideway Interfaces Gap- and Non-Gap-Related Safety Incidents One very important distinction with platform/guideway and platform/vehicle interface incident injuries is the difference between gap- and non-gap-related incidents. In general, nongap-related injuries are far more common on most rail transit systems.
From page 19...
... Platform/Guideway and Platform/Vehicle Interface Incident Characteristics and Rail Safety Programs 19 FRA Hazard Analysis Process The FRA strongly recommends that passenger railroads work to develop a hazard analysis plan as part of their hazard management process. The plan should ensure that all potential hazards are identified, inventoried, analyzed, and then mitigated at the earliest possible opportunity.
From page 20...
... 20 Manual to Improve Rail Transit Safety at Platform/Vehicle and Platform/Guideway Interfaces Japan Study: Analytical Hierarchy Process The case study involving platform safety of railroads in Japan numerically modeled safety to allow risk assessment comparison between stations. The primary goals were to identify specific safety weaknesses at stations and evaluate the effects of potential mitigation strategies.
From page 21...
... Platform/Guideway and Platform/Vehicle Interface Incident Characteristics and Rail Safety Programs 21 vehicle interface incidents on the LIRR, New Jersey Transit, and Metro-North commuter railroads in the United States from 2007 through 2014. Table 3.3 contains the qualitative data supplied by the three commuter railroads.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.