Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 21-30

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 21...
... 21 Introduction This chapter compares the results of in-the-field transverse cracking for the HMA and WMA pavements based on the 2012–2013 (first-round) and 2014–2015 (second-round)
From page 22...
... transverse crack Figure 3.1. Typical transverse cracking in overlay.
From page 23...
... 23 Note: The number in parentheses indicates the number of HMA-WMA pairs in each crack length comparison.
From page 24...
... 24 technologies are divided into three categories, namely chemical (including Evotherm and LEA) , organic (including Sasobit)
From page 25...
... 25 0 50 100 150 200 250 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Tr an sv er se C ra ck L en gt h, ft /2 00 ft Pavement Age, years TN SR 125 IA US 34 MT I-15 HMA WMA Figure 3.7. Transverse crack length versus pavement age for the second-round distress survey.
From page 26...
... 26 critical to the organic modified WMA pavement than to other WMA technologies in the long term. Further research is needed to evaluate the effect of long-term aging on WMA additives.
From page 27...
... 27 Figure 3.10. Number of HMA-WMA pairs that have consistent rankings between material property ranking and transverse cracking ranking based on the first-round distress survey results.
From page 28...
... 28 (24 out of 35 pairs) continue to provide the highest number of correlations for the ranking of transverse cracking.
From page 29...
... 29 and Roque 1994; Fromm and Phang 1972)
From page 30...
... 30 method was used. Each sample data item was validated once using LOOCV; Figure 3.13 (b)

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.