Long-Term Field Performance of Warm Mix Asphalt Technologies (2017) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 41-46
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 41... ...
41 Introduction This chapter describes the field performance of the HMA and WMA pavements in terms of rut depth based on the second-round field distress survey results, the analysis used to determine the significant determinants for rutting, and the method used to develop a predictive model for rut depth. Minimal rutting was found during the first-round distress survey.
|
From page 42... ...
42 (a) Projects Having Measurable Rut Depth Note: The projects without measurable rut depths for the second-round distress survey are the MT I-15 and MN TH 169 projects.
|
From page 43... ...
43 (a) Comparison Between Chemical and Organic (b)
|
From page 44... ...
44 • Binder properties: Jnr0.1, Jnr3.2, Jnrdiff, R0.1, R3.2; high temperature PG; and effective binder content. • Pavement structure: HMA thickness and overlay thickness.
|
From page 45... ...
45 of pavement thickness on rut depth is counterintuitive. However, based on both field measurements and prediction models, the relationship between pavement thickness and predicted rut depth can either be positive or negative (Von Quintus et al.
|
From page 46... ...
46 Moisture Susceptibility Overall, no moisture-related distress, such as raveling, was found in the field during the first- or second-round distress surveys. Therefore, the moisture susceptibility of the mixes was analyzed based on the HWT test results only.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.