Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 88-108

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 88...
... 88 Introduction This appendix documents the material properties and performance evolution for the new projects (i.e., MT I-15, TN SR 125, IA US 34, and LA US 61 projects) based on (1)
From page 89...
... 89 Creep Compliance Figures F.5 through F.8 present the creep compliance master curve comparisons between the first-round and secondround field cores for the MT I-15, TN SR 125, IA US 34, and LA US 61 projects, respectively. For the MT I-15 project (Figure F.5)
From page 90...
... 90 100 1000 10000 100000 0.0001 0.1 100 100000 100000000 1E+11 D yn am ic M od ul us (M Pa ) Reduced Frequency (Hz)
From page 91...
... 91 100 1000 10000 100000 0.0001 0.1 100 100000 100000000 D yn am ic M od ul us (M Pa ) Reduced Frequency (Hz)
From page 92...
... 92 1E-11 1E-10 1E-09 1E-08 0.0000001 1E-10 0.0000001 0.0001 0.1 100 100000 100000000 C re ep co m pl ia nc e ( 1/P a)
From page 93...
... 93 For the TN SR 125 project (Figure F.6) , the creep compliance curves of the 2014 field cores are lower than those of the 2011 field cores for both the HMA and the Evotherm mixtures.
From page 94...
... 94 projects, the fracture work density values of the second-round field cores are either comparable with (IA US 34) or lower (TN SR 125 and LA US 61)
From page 95...
... 95 Project Mix Type First-Round HFS, mm/mm Second-Round HFS, mm/mm First-Round Air Void Content, % Second-Round Air Void Content, % MT I-15 HMA 0.0096 (0.0015)
From page 96...
... 96 Project Mix Type First-Round Fracture Work Density, kPa Second-Round Fracture Work Density, kPa First-Round Air Void Content, % Second-Round Air Void Content, % MT I-15 HMA 28.7 (12.7)
From page 97...
... 97 Project Mix Type First-Round IDT Strength, kPa Second-Round IDT Strength, kPa First-Round Air Void Content, % Second-Round Air Void Content, % MT I-15 HMA 3360.4 (1437.4)
From page 98...
... 98 the 2013 field cores show comparable RRI values with the 2011 field cores, although the 2013 field cores have lower air void contents due to traffic densification. The laydown of the chip seal may have slowed the aging of the pavement and thus led to unimproved rutting resistance.
From page 99...
... 99 Project Binder Type Jnr3.2 R3.2 First-Round, kPa Second-Round, kPa First-Round, % Second-Round, % MT I-15 HMA 0.38 (0.04)
From page 100...
... 100 Evotherm binder from the TN 125 project shows statistically lower fracture energy values than the 2011 Evotherm extracted binder. Extracted Binder Fracture Properties at the Low Temperature Table F.14 presents the binder failure strain (at 41°F)
From page 101...
... Material Material Property HMA vs. WMA 2011 2013 14°F 68°F 86°F 14°F 68°F 86°F Mix Dynamic Modulus Sasobit < = = = = = Evotherm < = = = = > Foaming = = = = = = Creep Compliance Sasobit = > > = > = Evotherm = = = = > = Foaming = = < = > = Vertical Failure Deformation (68°F)
From page 102...
... 102 (a) HMA section (b)
From page 103...
... 103 (a) HMA: reflective cracking (b)
From page 104...
... 104 (a) Before Construction (b)
From page 105...
... 105 Figure F.16. (Continued)
From page 106...
... (a) Transverse Cracking Comparison 0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0 200.0 250.0 Tr an sv er se Cr ac k Le ng th , ft /2 00 ft HMA Evotherm Existing Overlay 10/24/2010 12/16/2014 (b)
From page 107...
... 107 (a) Transverse Crack 0 20 40 60 80 100 Tr an sv er se Cr ac k Le ng th , ft /2 00 ft HMA Sasobit Evotherm (b)
From page 108...
... 108 (a) Transverse Crack 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 Tr an sv er se C ra ck L en gt h, ft /2 00 ft HMA Sasobit Evotherm 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 Ru t D ep th , i n.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.