Assessing Aircraft Noise Conditions Affecting Student Learning–Case Studies (2017) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 96-119
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 96... ...
Appendix F Teacher Survey Report
|
From page 97... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-1 ACRP – Teacher Survey Draft Results Version: 06/01/17 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY E‐2 1. Overview of the report E‐5 2.
|
From page 98... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OVERVIEW 105 teachers, from 9 out of the 11 schools that took part in the classroom observation study, participated in the teacher survey. The teacher survey assessed a range of demographic factors, teacher perceived stress, teacher cognitive fatigue, noise annoyance, perceived interference of noise on school activities, and the perceived impact of aircraft noise on student behavior and teaching behavior.
|
From page 99... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-3 There was no significant difference in CFQ scores for those exposed to LAeq above 55dB compared with those exposed to LAeq below 50dB. NOISE ANNOYANCE 80.9% of the sample reported sometimes, often or always hearing aircraft noise around their school. Over one‐quarter of the sample (28.6%)
|
From page 100... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-4 IMPACT OF NOISE ON STUDENT & TEACHER BEHAVIOR Half of the sample reported that aircraft noise caused students to lose concentration (51.4%) and one‐ quarter felt that it caused students to chat and talk (26.7%)
|
From page 101... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-5 Demographic details: age, gender, grade taught, years teaching in the school, years teaching in total. Perceived health.
|
From page 102... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-6 Table 1: Description of the participants Variable % N Mean Standard Deviation Missing data % (n) Gender 104 1% (1)
|
From page 103... ...
Appendix We examin differences longer or w (years teac n=104)
|
From page 104... ...
Appendix 9.
|
From page 105... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-9 There were no significant differences in PSS score by age, grade taught, school, years teaching in total, or years teaching in this school (p>0.05) . Females had significantly higher PSS scale scores compared with males (female mean score=13.53, male mean score=10.43, β=3.08, 95%CI 0.07 to 6.08, p=0.045, n=98)
|
From page 106... ...
Appendix the scale in indicating v To comput data for th make up th one and 1. responden other CFQ Scores on t Figure 3 be There were teaching in mean scor Difference difference (unadjuste school, β=‐ F – Teacher S dicates a high ery good relia e the total sca e 25 CFQ varia e Cognitive Fa 9% missing on ts missing only variables, prio Table 3: Mi PSS Da Compl Missin Missin Missin he CFQ range low shows tha no significan this school (p e=31.60, male s in CFQ score in CFQ scores d β=1.36, 95% 0.32, 95%CI ‐6 urvey Report er degree of c bility for the s le score in our bles. Table 3 b ilures Questio ly two of the C one or two o r to calculating ssing data on ta available ete data for 25 g data for 1 qu g data for 2 qu g all 25 questi d from 6 to 67 t the data we Figu t differences in >0.05)
|
From page 107... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-11 5. Noise attitudes 5.1. Noise annoyance Annoyance at school to three sources of noise at school was assessed in the survey: aircraft noise, road traffic noise, and from other students. Aircraft noise annoyance Aircraft noise annoyance was assessed adapting the standard ISO questions (ISO/TS, 2003)
|
From page 108... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-12 (n) Aircraft noise bothers, disturbs or annoys when teaching 67 6.7% (7)
|
From page 109... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-13 Table 7: Frequencies for hear road traffic noise at school and road traffic noise annoyance at school Variable % N Missing data % (n) Hear road traffic noise 97 7.6% (8)
|
From page 110... ...
Appendix Figure 4 5.2. Interfe Interferen Teachers c activities (u Co St St St Th 53% of res teachers a concentrat students' p For analyse often or al There were aircraft no noise inter and for int year a teac F – Teacher S : Comparison rence from n ce from aircra ompleted five sing scale 1=n mmunication udents' attent udents' conce udents' perfor e quality of st pondents felt t nd students an ion (sometime erformance a s these quest ways'. no difference ise. Teachers fering with co erference with her had been urvey Report of being sligh oise at school ft noise at sch questions rela ever, 2=some between teac ion ntration mance udent's work hat aircraft no d with studen s, often or alw nd the quality ions were dich s by gender, a who had taugh mmunication b the quality of at the school i tly, moderatel noise fro ool (q14) ting to wheth times, 3=often hers and stude ise interfered ts' attention. S ays)
|
From page 111... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-15 Table 9: Frequencies for the interference from aircraft noise at school variables. Aircraft noise interferes with….. % N Missing data % (n)
|
From page 112... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-16 Interference from road traffic noise at school (q18) Teachers completed five questions relating to whether they felt road traffic noise interfered with the following school activities (using the scale 1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=always)
|
From page 113... ...
Appendix Figure 5: C 5.3. How s Teachers c students (u Lo Fi Ta M O Half of the that it caus misbehave F – Teacher S omparison of tudent behavi ompleted five sing scale yes sing concentr dgeting lking/chatting isbehaving ther. sample report ed students to . urvey Report percent of sa or is affected questions ask or no) : ation ed that aircra chat and talk mple reportin by aircraft noi ed whether stu ft noise caused (26.7%)
|
From page 114... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-18 Table 11: Frequencies for how behavior of your students is affected by aircraft noise variables. In what way is the behavior of your student affected by aircraft noise…… % N Missing data % (n) Lose concentration 98 6.7% (7)
|
From page 115... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-19 Stop speaking Do nothing/ignore Other Table 12 shows that approximately one‐third of the sample reported stopping speaking (33.3%) or raising their voice (29.5%)
|
From page 116... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-20 Call attention to the student. I use a bell to settle voices down. Redirect and ask them to pay attention to what they are doing.
|
From page 117... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-21 Table 13: Frequencies for the impact of aircraft noise on teaching variables. Aircraft noise makes me take the following actions….... % N Missing data % (n) Stop explanations 97 7.6 (8)
|
From page 118... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-22 If I'm in the class I don't have these problems unless I'm outside. I answered these questions as if I was outside. If the aircraft noise is loud, it means generally that the craft if flying low. That is scary to everyone and we usually pause until it stops.
|
From page 119... ...
Appendix F – Teacher Survey Report F-23 p=0.003, n=97; adjusted for age, gender, grade taught, years teaching in school OR=4.24, 95%CI 1.19‐15.12, p=0.026, n=95) . References Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. F., Fitzgerald, P. & Parkes, K. R. (1982)
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.