The National Academies Press

Currently Skimming:

Pages 153-252

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.

From page 153... ... REPORT OF THE WORKSHOP ON USE OF AUTOMATED MACHINE GUIDANCE (AMG) WITHIN THE TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Read the entire page →
From page 154... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report i Table of Contents Preface ......................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................... Read the entire page →
From page 155... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report ii Preface This report presents an overview and documentation of the Workshop on Use of Automated Machine Guidance (AMG) within the Transportation Industry, held in Altoona, Iowa, on October 1–2, 2009. Read the entire page →
From page 156... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report iii Acknowledgments The Earthworks Engineering Research Center (EERC) at Iowa State University and the University of Southern Mississippi gratefully acknowledge the Transportation Research Board for providing funding for this workshop through project NCHRP 10-77, Use of Automated Machine Guidance (AMG) Read the entire page →
From page 157... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report iv Executive Summary Application of automated machine guidance (AMG) technology to transportation construction projects has the potential to enhance the abilities of state agencies and contractors to deliver transportation construction projects better, faster, safer, and cheaper. Read the entire page →
From page 158... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report v • What does the near-future hold for improvements and new developments regarding AMG processes? Details of organized breakout sessions covering the topic areas of (1) Read the entire page →
From page 159... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report vi Synthesized and Ranked Priorities – General Session Rank Topics 1 Data: There is a need to improve data management and electronic data exchange formats such as xml and Landxml. These data exchange formats are not sufficiently robust to be appropriate for wide adoption. Read the entire page →
From page 160... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 1 Introduction The Challenge Automated machine guidance (AMG) links sophisticated design software with construction equipment to direct the operation of the machinery with a high level of precision, improving the speed and accuracy of the transportation construction process. Read the entire page →
From page 161... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 2 • An introductory plenary session • Several breakout sessions to discuss opportunities and obstacles for ensuring data integrity and quality results for the AMG process • Subsequent plenary sessions to review the findings of previous breakout sessions and identify further opportunities and obstacles by combining knowledge from the breakout sessions • Review of the proposed survey questionnaires The complete detailed agenda is provided in the Appendix. To start the event, participants were introduced and the research team communicated that the goals of the workshop were to develop a list of capabilities that must exist and obstacles that must be overcome to facilitate seamless electronic data transfer from the initial surveying to develop DTMs through design and construction to final inspection and verification. Read the entire page →
From page 162... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 3 Figure 1. Introductory slides. Read the entire page →
From page 163... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 4 Breakout Session Process There were several breakout sessions, group sessions, and requests for feedback over the two days of the workshop, which covered the following topic areas: • Opportunities and challenges - Three groups in earthwork - One group in paving/subgrades • Technical topics - Legal impacts - Development of 3D files - Accuracy best practices and inputs/outputs - Bid item quantity • Review of the proposed survey objectives and questions - Contractors (two groups) - Hardware/software vendors - Designers For each breakout session, the facilitators described the topic for discussion and provided direction and information on questions to be answered. Read the entire page →
From page 164... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 5 Figure 2. Breakout session instructions. Read the entire page →
From page 165... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 6 Legal Impacts For this session, the participants were asked to identify any legal issues with AMG and specifically the sharing of electronic engineered data (EED) that they had experienced personally or knew about second-hand from reliable sources. Read the entire page →
From page 166... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 7 Question 1-2 asked the participants to suggest current or desirable 3D model software capabilities that would facilitate the implementation of AMG within the transportation industry. A form was provided for them to identify (1) Read the entire page →
From page 167... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 8 Accuracy Best Practices and Inputs/Outputs This session was divided into four segments. The participants were asked to recall instances where AMG accuracy was compromised. Read the entire page →
From page 168... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 9 will also ask interviewees to list practices that are helpful in maintaining accuracy. The results of the interviews will be recorded for later analysis." Segment 3 – Accuracy Checks Participants were asked to propose local projects where participants can spot check for accuracy. Read the entire page →
From page 169... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 10 Segment 1 - Identifying Solutions The following processes were listed for consideration, and the participants were asked to describe each of the best practices and provide a point of contact where more information can be obtained: 1. Initial data collection (development of DTMs) Read the entire page →
From page 170... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 11 - Liabilities: There may be possibly higher upfront costs for software, hardware, and highly trained personnel and a possible inability to make gut-level checks for some types of design errors. Downstream personnel may be critical of design personnel for alternative designs that were not used and documented in unused parts of the model. Read the entire page →
From page 171... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 12 payments. Quality information is processed along with volume information to ensure that partial payments are made for earthwork or pavement that meets quality requirements. Read the entire page →
From page 172... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 13 results reported to the entire group for discussion. Drafts of the surveys are provided in the Appendix. Read the entire page →
From page 173... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 14 Facilitator Reports General Detailed comments recorded during the breakout session are presented in the following for all four general breakout groups. Following the group breakout sessions, the results from all sessions were presented to the larger group and discussed. Read the entire page →
From page 174... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 15 preconstruction survey, design optimization, data transfer, design revisions, model validation (QA) , defined process to address pay units • Agency, manufacturer, contractor working together • Cost savings/return on investment • Modernization of specifications • Training is needed for operators and agencies* Read the entire page →
From page 175... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 16 • AMG educational competencies of P.E.s and agency field personnel • Stakeless productivity gains of contractors being realized by agencies • Real-Time network support for virtual reference stations (latency) /virtual reference station real-time network to work for AMG • Format for sharing 3D model • QA/QC verification procedures • Solar flare season forecast for next few years can disrupt GPS system Opportunities • Error and clash detection • No third-party integrators • Less rework and conflict between stakeholders • Sharing as-built data back through the model • Data feedback loop as quantity "basis of payment" for more accurate pay estimates • Savings on purchases of base-stations: virtual reference station real-time network to work for AMG Breakout Group 1-3, Opportunities and Challenges - Charles Jahren (Facilitator) Read the entire page →
From page 176... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 17 - 2D utilities are almost impossible to detect, but with 3D you can almost clash-control - Possible collaboration with horizontal BIM • Modeling systems that include subgrade information such as Microstation and Autocad 3D civil • Challenge: There will always be constructability errors, but a transition from a 3D DOT model will help in the transition • Look deep into shrinkage and swell and how that works with the 3D • Opportunity: Mitigate construction claims; would be more about such quantities • Opportunity: Accelerate acceptance of the technology within the DOTs. The improvements of how DOT dollars are used? Read the entire page →
From page 177... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 18 • The community connection: Trimble-connected community is a big plus for a lot of the jobs. Also, communication to the operator is a nice feature. Read the entire page →
From page 178... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 19 3.2. Challenges Operator training DOT training Price Consistent format (Trimble, Topcon, etc.) Read the entire page →
From page 179... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 20 Machine lasts longer Move on the next job quicker Fewer tax dollars spent (public) Work last longer built Better/more accurate Looks nicer/lasts longer 6.2 Challenges Lack of standards Infrastructure standards (base station/radio/protocols, etc.) Read the entire page →
From page 180... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 21 List of Challenges (RANK 1 most important to 7 less important) Read the entire page →
From page 181... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 22 Table 1. List of Results from Voting Exercise – General Session Challenges Topic # Votes Training/agency/contractor 13 Procedure design -- construction 9 Modernize specification 6 Data management 1 AMG applications for paving/overlays 4 Quality improvement 1 Electronic data exchange formats (xml, Landxlm – not robust/compatible for wide adoption) Read the entire page →
From page 182... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 23 Table 2. Categorized (unranked) Read the entire page →
From page 183... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 24 Table 3. Synthesized and Ranked Priorities – General Session Topic # Votes Item Vote Rank 1. Read the entire page →
From page 184... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 25 Technical Breakout Session Results The technical breakout session are summarized in the following sections. Legal Impacts John Hannon (Facilitator/Recorder) Read the entire page →
From page 185... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 26 Development of 3D files Tulio Sulbaran (Facilitator/Recorder) The charge of this group was to list Opportunities Challenges of 3D model development for AMG. Read the entire page →
From page 186... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 27 Task 3. Identify any current legal barriers that may prevent the use of AMG processes, either by state transportation agencies or contractors, including electronic file use disclaimers, organized labor issues, and state statutes. Read the entire page →
From page 187... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 28 Question 1-2: Ask the participants to suggest current or desirable 3D model software capabilities that would facilitate the implementation of AMG within the transportation industry: 3D Model Software Capability Put [C] for Current or [D] Read the entire page →
From page 188... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 29 Question 1-3: Ask the participants about perceived (and/or real) benefits and challenges to implementing 3D model software to support the implementation of AMG within the transportation industry: Perceived Benefits and Challenges Put [B] Read the entire page →
From page 189... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 30 Question 1-4: Ask the participants about who owns the 3D model and what is the liability of sharing the 3D model to support the implementation of AMG within the transportation industry: Ownership and/or Liabilities of Shared 3D Models Name of the Participant Making the Suggestion Clients retains ownership/liability but freely distributes to (bidding ) contractors 4 Designer then client ownership/liability 2 Contractor ownership/liability 5 P.E. Read the entire page →
From page 190... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 31 Segment 2 - 6:10pm -6:25pm – 3D Model Development/Software Training Supported Task Task 4. Identify and review current AMG training opportunities (e.g., literature and courses) Read the entire page →
From page 191... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 32 Segment 3 – 6:25pm – 6:35pm – Current Best Practices and Input/Output Accuracy Supported Task Task 5. Identify the current best practices and the challenges associated with the development of a project design model that is suitable for use by AMG technology. Read the entire page →
From page 192... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 33 Question 3-2: Ask the participants to list accuracy differences/challenges between the input data in the 3D models and the output data to support AMG in the transportation industry: Accuracy Challenges of 3D Models Name of the Participant Making the Suggestion Triangular irregular network (TIN) models vs. Read the entire page →
From page 193... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 34 Accuracy Best Practices and Inputs/Outputs David White (Facilitator) , Adam Dubree (Recorder) Read the entire page →
From page 194... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 35 Random • #1. Errors in setting up the control network (Is the control permanent or a temporary or a combination of the two? Read the entire page →
From page 195... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 36 90% I exchange, but we buy new or hire repair; 10% hire Ziegler, I try to keep one of everything in my truck: cords and, if available, machine parts (SV5/GCS6/10/11) Design – office: looking at model in 3D on computer, comparing model to paper plans – some things you fix, others you ask designer to repair 3 Field – comparing model to surveyor's stakes; have surveyor stake center of road, building corners. Read the entire page →
From page 196... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 37 Bid item quantity Charles Jahren (Facilitator/Recorder) Segment 1 • Projects with private owners such as developers are more advanced in using and taking advantage of data file sharing, because much of the construction is done under a design-build delivery system where there is a higher degree of integration among the owner, designer, and constructor. Read the entire page →
From page 197... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 38 Segment 3 No specific input from the expert contact group was collected. Segment 4 Comments provided by the expert contact group are as follows: • There is agreement that design errors are often caught in the process of developing 3D models. Read the entire page →
From page 198... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 39 • Some contractors double check GPS elevations with other GPS elevations. It is better to double check GPS using a completely different method, such as total station or laser. Read the entire page →
From page 199... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 40 One important question that should be considered is, "How should the quality of a TIN model be specified? " This needs to be communicated so that designers, contractors, and owners can have predictability about what a TIN model can be expected to deliver and how much effort is required to develop it. Read the entire page →
From page 200... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 41 Review of the Proposed Survey Questionnaires The results of the review of the survey questionnaires are provided in the following sections. Breakout Group, Contractor Survey Review, Charles Jahren (Facilitator/Recorder) Read the entire page →
From page 201... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 42 • Question 9. How are you going to use this question? Read the entire page →
From page 202... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 43 • Question 34. Answer (d) Read the entire page →
From page 203... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 44 • What are the machine standards to qualify them capable of GPS? • What's the process for building? Read the entire page →
From page 204... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 45 Result of the Breakout Session: Consolidated group feedback regarding the survey target to DESIGN agency: • Terms are not the same among the stakeholders of the project. For instance, 1- most people associate DTM with original terrain, but not everybody. Read the entire page →
From page 205... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 46 - "How are your 3D models created? " • The cross-section is created first and then the 3D model. Read the entire page →
From page 206... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 47 Training Information Request The information provided in Table 4 is a summary of the training information collected during the workshop. Table 4. Read the entire page →
From page 207... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 48 Summary A workshop was held among approximately 30 members of the NCHRP 10-77 expert contact group. A combination of breakout sessions, general sessions, and participant input via paper forms were conducted to provide information on the following: • Top opportunities and challenges • Legal impacts • Development of 3D files • Accuracy best practices and input/outputs • Bid item quantities • Literature • Training opportunities In addition, the expert contact group reviewed copies of the proposed survey objectives and questions and provided input. Read the entire page →
From page 208... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 49 Appendix Information provided in the Appendix includes the following: - Workshop Agenda - Invitation Letter and Meeting Location - List of Participants - Literature Review Summary - Draft Survey Questionnaires - Photos of the Event Read the entire page →
From page 209... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 50 Agenda Automatic Machine Guidance Workshop NCHRP 10-77 Iowa State University University of Southern Mississippi Des Moines, Iowa, Thursday Oct 1st through Friday Oct 2nd. Meeting Location: Zeigler Incorporated 1500 Ziegler Dr NW Altoona, IA 50009, (515) Read the entire page →
From page 210... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 51 FRIDAY OCTOBER 2ND 7:15 to 8:00 AM Breakfast • Fill out literature review forms 8:00 to 8:15 AM General session -- instructions for survey review (John Hannon) 8:15 to 9:15 AM Breakout sessions -- survey review • Review survey objectives • Review survey questions • Suggestions for targeting respondents 9:15 to 9:30 AM Break 9:30 to 10:30 AM Closing general session • Survey review results (John Hannon 30 min) Read the entire page →
From page 211... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 52 Invitation Letter Automatic Machine Guidance Workshop. NCHRP 10-77 Iowa State University University of Southern Mississippi Des Moines, Iowa, Thursday Oct 1st through Friday Oct 2nd. Read the entire page →
From page 212... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 53 Meeting Location: 1500 Ziegler Dr NW, Altoona, IA 50009, (515) 957-3800 Contact: Josh Olson Hotel Information: Holiday Inn Express Hotel & Suites 165 Adventureland Drive NW Altoona, 50009 (515) Read the entire page →
From page 213... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 54 NCHRP 10-77 Workshop Participant List NAME Company Phone Email 1 Bil lerbeck, Jason Peterson Contractors 319-345-2713 jbil lerbeck@petersoncontractors.com 2 Braddy, Katherine Caterpil lar 309-578-7049 Braddy_Katherine_C@cat.com 3 Brenner, Mark GOMACO 712-364-3347 markb@gomaco.com 4 Bush, John Kewit 773-917-2202 john.bush@kiewit.com 5 Cackler, Tom CPTech Center 515-294-3230 tcackler@iastate.edu 6 Clabaugh, Curtis Wyoming DOT 307-777-4086 curtis.clabaugh@dot.state.wy.us 7 Corcoran, Paul Caterpil lar 309-578-7049 corco@verizon.net 8 Dahlinger, Jerry Guntert & Zimmerman 209 599 6131 Gdahlinger@guntert.com 10 Dubree, Adam Univ Southern Mississippi 815-383-1818 adam.dubree@usm.edu 11 Gothard, Tony Kiewit 773-917-2202 anthony.gothard@kiewit.com 12 Hannon, John USM 601-266-5550 john.hannon@usm.edu 13 Hilgendorf, Tim Kiewit 208-897-5017 timothy.hilgendorf@kiewit.com 14 Hoeft, Tim Ziegler Inc. 952-885-8256 Tim.Hoeft@zieglercat.com 15 Jahren, Charles Iowa State University 515-294-3829 cjahren@iastate.edu 16 Johnson, Corey Bentley 515-460-4824 corey.johnson@bentley.com 17 Klein, Kevin GOMACO 712-364-3347 klein@gomaco.com 19 Mazur, Chris Leica Machine Control Division 440-364-5330 Chris.Mazur@leicaus.com 20 Morrison, Matthew Leica Machine Control Division 616 821-1812 matthew.morrison@leicaus.com 21 Nicholson, Kent Iowa DOT 515-239-1586 kent.nicholson@dot.iowa.gov 22 Olson, Josh Ziegler Inc. Read the entire page →
From page 214... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 55 DOT Specifications Obtained by Study AASHTO • Requirements for Electronic Data to be Supplied to Construction (6/04/2007) COLORADO DOT • Pilot Project Special Provision: Revision of Section 625 Survey Control of Grading by GPS of RTS Methods (11/3/2008) Read the entire page →
From page 215... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 56 Literature on AMG Collected to Date AGC/DOT Subcommittee on Emerging Technologies. (2008, January) Read the entire page →
From page 216... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 57 GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM Significant Challenges in Sustaining and Upgrading Widely Used Capabilities. Read the entire page →
From page 217... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 58 http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/esc/geometronics/SurveysManual/Land%20Surve ys%20Interim%20Guidelines.pdf. Lasers GPS Machine Control Specialists. Read the entire page →
From page 218... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 59 SCS900 Site Controller Software: Installing and Using the PC Emulator. (2008, October 15) Read the entire page →
From page 219... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 60 Draft Survey Questionnaires The following are draft survey questions which were utilized in the workshop for feedback from the Expert Panel members. The surveys have since been edited to incorporate information gained at the workshop. Read the entire page →
From page 220... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 61 I How is liability mitigated? Read the entire page →
From page 221... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 62 10. Who creates Digital Terrain Models (DTM) Read the entire page →
From page 222... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 63 d. Alignment e. Read the entire page →
From page 223... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 64 a. Read the entire page →
From page 224... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 65 b. Automated machine grading exposes errors in design in sufficient time not to require rework. Read the entire page →
From page 225... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 66 g. Other: (text box) Read the entire page →
From page 226... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 67 NCHRP 10-77 Draft Survey Questions-CONTRACTORS Task (2) Read the entire page →
From page 227... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 68 (SHOULD THIS SURVEY HAVE THE OPTION TO REMAIN ANONYMOUS? My opinion is yes) Read the entire page →
From page 228... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 69 12. If your owner-agency allows GPS Automatic Machine Grading and Staking technology on projects, how is quality control (tolerances) Read the entire page →
From page 229... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 70 18. What equipment brand do you utilize on your grading equipment? Read the entire page →
From page 230... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 71 25. How do your construction personnel perform QA/QC when Automated Machine Grading is in process? Read the entire page →
From page 231... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 72 a. File size of DTM(s) Read the entire page →
From page 232... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 73 NCHRP 10-77 Draft Survey Questions-PLANNING (AGENCY) Read the entire page →
From page 233... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 74 4. IF your agency utilizes GPS for initial surveying, which of the following data is collected utilizing GPS? Read the entire page →
From page 234... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 75 11. If your agency utilizes GPS for surveying, which of the following reference control technologies are utilized? Read the entire page →
From page 235... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 76 a. Rotation b. Read the entire page →
From page 236... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 77 u. Adjustment and error summary v. Read the entire page →
From page 237... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 78 f. Other. Read the entire page →
From page 238... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 79 NCHRP 10-77 Draft Survey Questions-PROCUREMENT/CONSTRUCTION (AGENCY) Read the entire page →
From page 239... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 80 M Is there interest in more complete data collection, such as capturing streams of machine position data along with [possibly] Read the entire page →
From page 240... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 81 f. Other 8. Read the entire page →
From page 241... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 82 agencies allows GPS Automatic Machine Grading and Staking technology on projects, should a separate Bid Item be included in the Proposal/Contract? Read the entire page →
From page 242... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 83 f. Other 19. Read the entire page →
From page 243... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 84 25. If your agency shares Electronic Engineered Data (EED) Read the entire page →
From page 244... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 85 e. Other 30. Read the entire page →
From page 245... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 86 36. Does a typical contract involving AMG require the contractor to provide agency personnel with the means to electronically check grades? Read the entire page →
From page 246... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 87 b. Read the entire page →
From page 247... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 88 Selected Pictures NCHRP 10-77 Automated Machine Guidance Workshop Altoona, Iowa October 1-2, 2009 Picture 1: Due to the excellent relationship between the Research Team and industry, Ziegler graciously provided their facility to host the workshop Picture 2: Cat legacy equipment in the entrance of Ziegler facility Read the entire page →
From page 248... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 89 Picture 3: Welcome Session. The participants were debriefed regarding the project objective and workshop dynamic Picture 4: Breakout discussion with small active group sharing opportunities and challenges regarding Automatic Machine Guidance moderated by a member of the research team Read the entire page →
From page 249... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 90 Picture 5: Representative of a breakout group presents to all members of the workshop a summary of the discussion that was produced by the small group Picture 6: Representative of a breakout answering questions regarding the summary results Read the entire page →
From page 250... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 91 Picture 7: Participants of the workshop walking around the meeting room voting for the most important opportunities and challenges of Automatic Machine Guidance Picture 8: Resulting raw votes received for the most important opportunities and challenges of one group Read the entire page →
From page 251... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 92 Picture 9: Resulting raw votes received for the most important challenges summarized by another team Picture 10: Processed votes of opportunities and challenges for Automatic Machine Guidance presented to all participants of the Workshop (Day 2) Read the entire page →
From page 252... ... NCHRP 10-77 October 1–2, 2009 -- Workshop Report 93 Picture 11: AMG Workshop participants Read the entire page →

From page 153...

... REPORT OF THE WORKSHOP ON USE OF AUTOMATED MACHINE GUIDANCE (AMG) WITHIN THE TRANSPORTATION INDUSTRY National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)