Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 94-113

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 94...
... 94 A P P E N D I X B : A G E N C Y S U R V E Y Agency Survey Introduction This appendix describes the findings from a national survey of multimodal access management needs and practices. The purpose of the survey was to identify multimodal access management interactions and to guide the research team and panel in selecting interactions to evaluate in greater detail.
From page 95...
... 95 interactions between access management treatments and modal performance that have not been adequately evaluated. The purpose of this survey is to obtain practitioner perspectives as to the possible effects of access management treatments (or combinations of treatments)
From page 96...
... 96 6. Manage the spacing of signalized and unsignalized access on crossroads in the vicinity of freeway interchanges 7.
From page 97...
... 97 Survey Distribution A total of 381 individuals responded to the survey, with the majority identifying as consultants (27.3%) , state transportation agency staff (27.0%)
From page 98...
... 98 24.0% 32.7% 42.7% 43.9% 48.6% 49.2% 53.3% 56.7% 57.9% 58.9% 61.7% 61.7% 62.0% 62.0% 63.9% 64.5% Other Install service or frontage roads Install continuous two‐way left‐turn lane on undivided highway (non‐road diet scenarios) Improve supporting network Manage the spacing of signalized and unsignalized access on crossroads in the vicinity of freeway interchanges Manage the location and placement of parking Control driveway design elements Consolidate driveways Manage spacing of traffic signals Install right‐turn lanes Install nontraversable medians Provide adequate sight distance at access points Manage location and spacing of unsignalized access Install roundabout Install or modify left‐turn lanes Manage the location, spacing and design of median openings Figure 2.
From page 99...
... 99 Impacts of Access Management Treatments A series of exploratory queries asked respondents to note any adverse or positive safety or operational impacts on non-auto modes of the access management treatments they had implemented. Respondents were further asked to describe the nature of the impacts and whether the impacts were anecdotal or documented.
From page 100...
... 100 One respondent summarized the pedestrian safety issues associated with access management as follows: "The primary triggers for negative safety impacts involve multiple-threat scenarios, too many opposing lanes to cross, oncoming vehicle speeds, limited sight distance and time of day/limited light and pedestrians wearing dark closing exercising midblock and diagonal crossings. Uncontrolled street and access placement along multilane corridors with center left turns lanes introduces multiple-threat scenarios that can shadow other approaching vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle traffic." Another respondent summarized the safety and operational issues associated with access management and pedestrians in the following way: "(1)
From page 101...
... 101 Some pedestrians choose to cross midblock to save time. Block spacing may be longer than deemed convenient.
From page 102...
... 102 constraints due to existing conditions can result in less-than-optimal results or designs in relation to both auto and non-auto modes. The potential for some types of interchanges (e.g., cloverleaf)
From page 103...
... 103  Installing pedestrian and bicycle refuges in locations where there are curbed medians.  We have most recently installed a raised median in a college town, but admittedly do not handle enough urban sections to have a large influence on non-motorized modes of transport.
From page 104...
... 104  Including modal users and vehicles/services in the justification, planning and design of the treatment (and also having developments integrate those modes as part of their impacts and improvements)
From page 105...
... 105 Table 66. Treatments identified by 15% or more of respondents as positively impacting operation of non-auto modes.
From page 106...
... 106 Consolidating Driveways  The positive impact for bikes of consolidating driveways is the ability to create cycle tracks or enhanced bike lanes.  Managing how travelers interact throughout the roadway network is beneficial for everyone.
From page 107...
... 107  Volume-to-capacity ratio  Traffic operations complaints Total responses: 156 Figure 3. Measures of effectiveness for evaluating the effects of access management treatments on non-auto modes.
From page 108...
... 108 Walking/Bicycling Generally  During draft long-range-planning public discussions, various participants expressed a preference for walking and biking along roadways where driveways/traffic conflicts are managed.  The benefit of extending the sidewalk across the driveway entrance (at-grade)
From page 109...
... 109 Right-Turn Lanes  Right-turn lanes and the related increase in crossing distance for pedestrians; right-turn lanes and conflicts with bike lane treatments; right-turn lanes and possible increase in right-turn-on-red conflicts with pedestrians. Non-Traversable Medians  Raised medians are opposed by a furniture store that doesn't have many options for loading/unloading near the front door.
From page 110...
... 110 Figure 4. Access management treatments needing additional analysis relative to non-auto modes.
From page 111...
... 111 Table 68. Consultant multimodal access management analysis priorities.
From page 112...
... 112  Often, pedestrians need to cross streets, but a signal is not warranted because it is too close to an adjacent signal, but too far to reasonably expect a pedestrian to detour. Right-Turn Lanes  Right-turn lanes and vehicle approach speeds often conflict with pedestrian crossings, especially combined with right-turn-on-red on suburban arterials.
From page 113...
... 113 Left-Turn Lanes  The permissive and protected left-turning arrow phase timing may need to be adjusted for different road classifications. This may result in no one standard timing fitting all left-turn signals.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.