Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 5-14

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 5...
... 5 Chapter 2 Field Testing of Ferric Oxide Media Filters: Project Design 2.1 Field Testing Sites and Tributary Watersheds Two existing ferric oxide filters were chosen for this study. Both sites have similar design characteristics: (1)
From page 6...
... 6 Figure 2-2 Highway 36/61 vault-type ferric oxide filter during and after construction. From aerial and ground-based photographs of the Woodlynn Avenue and the Highway 36/61 cells, differences are apparent in the tributary watersheds and this influenced designed decisions, affects runoff chemistry, and site hydrology and hydraulics.
From page 7...
... 7 Figure 2-3 Modified design drawing for the Woodlynn Avenue ferric oxide-sand filter. 2.1.1.2 Vault-Type Filter at Highway 36/61 The ferric oxide filter at Highway 36/61 consists of two inlets with the HWY Inlet West inlet fed by direct highway runoff and runoff to the HWY Inlet Pond originating from highways and commercial properties as well as some open space consisting of swales and small intermittent wetlands (see Figure 2-4)
From page 8...
... 8 Figure 2-4 Modified design drawing of the Highway 36/61 ferric oxide filter. 2.1.1.3 Differences of the Ferric Oxide Filter Systems Studied There are several significant differences between the designs of these two systems; the differences and how they are expressed in the monitoring data are discussed in Chapter 3.
From page 9...
... 9 material compared the Highway 36/61 material. Also provided for comparison is the elemental analysis of the iron aggregate used as the parent material for the ferric oxide filter (Table 2-2)
From page 10...
... 10 2.2 Monitoring Design 2.2.1 Objectives and Sampling Design The overall objective of this study is to monitor two full scale ferric oxide-sand filters to quantify the capacity of a ferric oxide media used in a filter bed to remove dissolved metals from natural stormwater runoff and under natural hydrologic conditions. The monitoring design was scoped to enable the practitioner to estimate potential metals removal as a percentage and load reduction for filtration practices that use ferric oxide in a similar manner to the systems evaluated in this current study.
From page 11...
... 11 the analytical laboratories will be maintained in Barr's Laboratory Management Information System to minimize data management error. 2.2.1.1 Monitoring Locations Woodlynn Avenue Figure 2-3 shows the sampling layout of the Woodlynn Avenue site.
From page 12...
... 12 Table 2-3 Parameters monitored, method and reporting units. Test Method  Analyte  Reporting  Limit  Units  Metals  EPA 1638 Mod  As  0.080  µg/L  EPA 1638 Mod  Cr  0.15  µg/L  EPA 1638 Mod  Cu  0.30  µg/L  EPA 1638 Mod  Fe  6.0  µg/L  EPA 1638 Mod  Pb  0.030  µg/L  EPA 1638 Mod  Ni  0.24  µg/L  EPA 1638 Mod  Zn  3.0  µg/L  General Parameters  SM2540 D‐97  TSS  0.6  mg/L  SM2540 E‐97  VSS  0.6  mg/L  SM5310C‐00  DOC  0.5  mg/L  SM2320 B‐97  Alkalinity, Total (as CaCO3)
From page 13...
... 13  Dissolved oxygen probe (HOBO DO Data Logger U26-001)  Tipping bucket rain gauge (Texas Electronics 525-L Rain Gage with 6-in.
From page 14...
... 14 Accuracy For the analytical results, accuracy is evaluated as the degree of agreement between an observed value and an accepted reference value and measures bias in a measurement system. Accuracy will be addressed by calibrating field and laboratory instruments, and by analyzing laboratory quality control samples.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.