Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 299-309

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 299...
... 293 A P P E N D I X D On-Ramp Queue Spillback Check Queue spillback into an arterial intersection may occur when the freeway merge segment has insufficient capacity to process the ramp's demand. Spillback may also occur in cases of ramp metering.
From page 300...
... 294 Figure D-1. Procedure for detecting spillback occurrence at an on-ramp
From page 301...
... 295 Step 1 – Demand Estimation The first step in the methodology calculates the entering demand flow rate at the onramp (vR) , as a function of the upstream intersection configuration and operations.
From page 302...
... 296 𝑁 , = 𝑁 , , 𝑁 , , (Equation D-3) Figure D-2.
From page 303...
... 297 With very few adjustments, estimating the on-ramp throughput from this intersection type is a relatively straightforward task. The first step is to identify the movements that discharge to the on-ramp and their respective ranks (priority orders)
From page 304...
... 298 Where: Ξ»LT = departure rate from major street left turn into the on-ramp (veh/h) vLT = demand flow rate for the major street left turn cp,j = potential capacity for the major street left turn (veh/h)
From page 305...
... 299 𝑣 = , + , + , (Equation D-10) Where: vR = on-ramp flow rate (veh/h)
From page 306...
... 300 Step 2 – Capacity Estimation As shown in Figure D-1, capacity at the on-ramp must be estimated in order to predict the occurrence of queue spillback. Three cases may occur: Case 1 – Ramp metering is active In this case, the metering rate is a required user input (veh/h)
From page 307...
... 301 Example Problem – Signalized intersection with ramp metering This example is based on the configuration used in the HCM Chapter 34 (Ramp Terminals and Alternative Intersections Supplemental) , as shown in Figure D-5.
From page 308...
... 302 There are two movements that discharge directly to the on-ramp: WBR (Ξ¦16 – Phase I) and EBL (Ξ¦5 – Phase III)
From page 309...
... 303 Table D-3 – On-ramp throughput for WBR movement Movement WBR demand flow rate (veh/h) WBR arrival rate (veh/s)

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.