The National Academies Press

Currently Skimming:

VII. OVERVIEW OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVACY PROTECTIONS
Pages 41-42

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.

From page 41... ... In its 2020 report to the Senate Appropriations Framework,329 published in January 2020, offers guidelines for Committee, it noted enterprises to manage privacy issues. This work complements to better equip the Commission to meet its statutory mission to pro other NIST efforts in cybersecurity.330 The FTC has also pro- tect consumers, we urge Congress to enact privacy and data security legislation, enforceable by the FTC, which grants the agency civil vided supportive comments on the proposed NIST Privacy penalty authority, targeted APA rulemaking authority, and jurisdicFramework.331 tion over non-profits and common carriers.336 Among the efforts by NIST in cybersecurity is its Special Publication entitled Zero Trust Architecture.332 Zero trust archi tecture uses an evolving set of cybersecurity paradigms that VII. Read the entire page →
From page 42... ... Supreme Court had concluded that the and "private affairs," if any, is unclear, and case law addressing use of beepers to track suspects across public space was permis any potential distinction is scant. sible without a warrant,351 the Campbell court concluded that The state constitutional provisions establishing privacy such a practice was prohibited by the Oregon Constitution.352 rights generally reference the need to limit government activ- As the capability of tracking surveillance was enhanced with ity or provide protection concerning government actions like the advent of GPS technology, additional state courts addressed searches and seizures. Read the entire page →

From page 41...

... In its 2020 report to the Senate Appropriations Framework,329 published in January 2020, offers guidelines for Committee, it noted enterprises to manage privacy issues. This work complements to better equip the Commission to meet its statutory mission to pro other NIST efforts in cybersecurity.330 The FTC has also pro- tect consumers, we urge Congress to enact privacy and data security legislation, enforceable by the FTC, which grants the agency civil vided supportive comments on the proposed NIST Privacy penalty authority, targeted APA rulemaking authority, and jurisdicFramework.331 tion over non-profits and common carriers.336 Among the efforts by NIST in cybersecurity is its Special Publication entitled Zero Trust Architecture.332 Zero trust archi tecture uses an evolving set of cybersecurity paradigms that VII.

Read the entire page →

From page 42...

... Supreme Court had concluded that the and "private affairs," if any, is unclear, and case law addressing use of beepers to track suspects across public space was permis any potential distinction is scant. sible without a warrant,351 the Campbell court concluded that The state constitutional provisions establishing privacy such a practice was prohibited by the Oregon Constitution.352 rights generally reference the need to limit government activ- As the capability of tracking surveillance was enhanced with ity or provide protection concerning government actions like the advent of GPS technology, additional state courts addressed searches and seizures.

Read the entire page →

← Previous Chapter Skim

Next Chapter Skim →

This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.

VII. OVERVIEW OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVACY PROTECTIONS Pages 41-42

VII. OVERVIEW OF STATE CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVACY PROTECTIONS
Pages 41-42