Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:


Pages 19-37

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 19...
... 19 C H A P T E R 2 Research Approach Objective and Scope The objective of this research was to determine the effect of in-place AV on the performance of asphalt pavements using data from the LTPP database and other appropriate sources. For clarity, the term in-place AV was defined as the as-constructed AV measured during construction.
From page 20...
... 20 LTPP Study Study Description No. of Sections SPS 1 Strategic Study of Structural Factors for Flexible Pavements, New/Reconstructed AC pavements 149 SPS 5 AC Overlay of AC Pavement 90 SPS 8 Study of Environmental Effects in the Absence of Heavy Loads 33 SPS 9N Superpave Asphalt Binder Study (New AC Pavement Construction)
From page 21...
... 21 Figure 2-2. Distribution of selected LTPP sections in each LTPP climate zone.
From page 22...
... 22 Figure 2-4. Distribution of selected LTPP sections by traffic.
From page 23...
... 23 are twice as many wheel path measurements as there are non-wheel path measurements. There is a slight shift (0.32 AV)
From page 24...
... 24 Number of Performance Measures Figure 2-8 shows that more than two-thirds of the sections have more than eight increments of performance data collected. Figure 2-8.
From page 25...
... 25 pavement surface performance (rutting and thermal cracking) and pavement full depth performance (fatigue cracking)
From page 26...
... 26 Figure 2-9. Location of LTPP sections initially selected for analysis.
From page 27...
... 27 pavement section attributes dataset to obtain the final analysis dataset for each of the four performance characteristics in this study: ride, fatigue cracking, thermal cracking, and rutting. The following parts of this chapter describe each of the aforementioned data processing steps along with summary statistics of the intermediate datasets.
From page 28...
... 28 LTPP Section Material Attributes. Asphalt mixture consists of aggregate, asphalt binder, and AV.
From page 29...
... 29 β€’ Average binder content, BCm, computed as the mean of all asphalt layers' binder content values (𝐡𝐢 ) weighted by the layers' thickness used as a variable for the analysis of fatigue cracking.
From page 30...
... 30 πΈβˆ— = βˆ‘βˆ‘ / ,βˆ— (5) Where: E*
From page 31...
... 31 Where: MrBSB = compound BSB resilient modulus of section; thl = thickness of base or sub-base layer l, with L being the total number of base or sub-base layers in the pavement section; and MrBSB,l = BSB resilient modulus of layer l. Remove or Impute Data The resulting section attribute dataset contained missing values for some of the variables.
From page 32...
... 32 implemented using R programming language (R) "mice" (Mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations)
From page 33...
... 33 Figure 2-11. Distribution of original values and with imputed values for selected variables.
From page 34...
... 34 over time) , a change in both, or in no significant changes to the performance of the section.
From page 35...
... 35 minimum and maximum values for some attributes represent extreme values that would not be considered normal and have very little influence on the analysis as 1 of 400 values. Obvious examples are 221 inches of base/subbase and 4400 ksi for asphalt mixture E*
From page 37...
... 37 β€’ Precipitation, Precyr, was captured by the total precipitation for the year obtained from the LTPP database TOTAL_ANN_PRECIP field in the CLM_VWS_PRECIP_ANNUAL table. Annual Traffic Variables.

Key Terms



This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.