Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Section 5 - Business Case for and Barriers to Adoption of UHPC-C
Pages 16-18

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 16...
... For other deck connections, however, interviewees indicated that the performance of CC-C or steel bolts is generally suffi­ cient, reducing the relative advantage of UHPC-C. The main alternatives to using prefabricated deck slabs are to pour and field-set a solid deck in place or to use lateral slides, whereby a solid deck is poured and field-set in an area adjacent to the bridge being constructed and then slid into place.
From page 17...
... Interview respondents noted similar, although admittedly hyperbolic, sentiments that UHPC "lasts forever" and will "never" require maintenance.2 Inter­viewees also indicated that UHPC performance attributes enable up to a 50% reduction in material requirements compared with conventional concrete. For deck connection applications, the material reduction can reduce spatial requirements for construction zones and increase space allotted to traffic, thereby improving work-zone safety.
From page 18...
... Yet, the key barrier to developing generic UHPC mixes, interviewees said, is a lack of trialability. Stakeholder interviews highlighted the need for additional standards on baseline properties and testing for generic UHPC mixes to help increase trialability -- and thereby trust in the ability of these mixes to compete with proprietary blends.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.