Managing a Flight Diversion with an Emergency Response at Small, Non-Hub, or General Aviation Airports (2023) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 84-86
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 84... ...
84 Conclusion and Summary Interviews with smaller airports, regional groups, airline pilots, the FAA, and technology companies combined with recent literature and survey findings reveal that smaller airports receive and manage numerous gas and go diversions regularly using on-airport resources including FBOs and ground handlers. They may also receive several technical stop diversions at once, creating incident-level situations that they also regularly manage without exceeding their capacity and capabilities -- some using formalized plans and/or checklists, and others not.
|
From page 85... ...
Conclusion and Summary of Findings 85 • It was not clear whether many smaller airports have implemented newer communication technology, such as web-based mass notification and management software. • Very little research is available specifically related to flight diversion events that assess how small airports can recover quickly and successfully from situations like these.
|
From page 86... ...
86 Managing a Flight Diversion with an Emergency Response at Small, Non-Hub, or General Aviation Airports – Determine the need for and responsibilities of a diversion champion at smaller airports. This type of position may be an appropriate member of an IROPS Committee, an IROPS regional group, or an Emergency Working Group.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.