Skip to main content

Ranking Hazardous-Waste Sites for Remedial Action (1994) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:

REFERENCES
Pages 279-294

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 279...
... Pp. 511 516 in the 5th National Conference on Management of Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites, Nov.
Read the entire page →
From page 280...
... 1986. Development and Demon stration of a Hazard Assessment Rating Methodology for Phase II of the Installation Restoration Program.
Read the entire page →
From page 281...
... 1981. Site Ranking Model for Determining Remedial Action Priorities Among Un controlled Hazardous Substances Facilities.
Read the entire page →
From page 282...
... DOE Environmental Restoration Priority System. Of lice of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, U.S.
Read the entire page →
From page 283...
... Environmental Protection Agency, Con tract 68 W8 0098, by the Environmental Law Institute, Wash ington, D.C. ELl (Environmental Law Institute)
Read the entire page →
From page 284...
... 1991a. National Priorities List, Supplementary Lists and Supporting Materials.
Read the entire page →
From page 285...
... Depart ment of the Air Force, Air Force Bases. Federal Facilities Environmental Restoration Dialogue Commit tee.
Read the entire page →
From page 286...
... 1989. Comparison of an index function and a vecto rial approach method for ranking waste disposal sites.
Read the entire page →
From page 287...
... 1992. Reilly approves plan to speed superfund waste removal, recluce study time.
Read the entire page →
From page 288...
... 1991. Keystone National Dialogue on Federal Facility Environmental Management.
Read the entire page →
From page 289...
... Abandoned or Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Disposal Sites in Missouri ant! Hazardous Waste Remedial Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balance.
Read the entire page →
From page 290...
... Remedial Response, State of Ohio Environmen tat Protection Agency, Columbus, Ohio. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.
Read the entire page →
From page 291...
... Statement of V Rezencles before the Department of Energy Defense Nu clear Facilities Panel Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives.
Read the entire page →
From page 292...
... Porous Media. Open File Report pre parect for the Environmental Institute for Waste Management Studies, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Ala.
Read the entire page →
From page 293...
... State of California Toxic Substances Control Program, Department of Health Sciences, Health and Welfare Agency, Sacramento, Calif. Superfunct Fact Sheet.
Read the entire page →
From page 294...
... Toxics Cleanup Program, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, Wash. Westman, W.E.
Read the entire page →

Key Terms

  • environmental restoration
  • hazard ranking
  • analytic hierarchy
  • toxic substances
  • hierarchy process

  • remedial response
  • environmental quality
  • defense priority
  • restoration program
  • substances control

  • waste management
  • installation restoration
  • disposal sites
  • priority model
  • uncontrolled hazardous

  • environmental law
  • law institute
  • federal facility
  • york state
  • remedial action

  • nuclear facilities
  • soil conservation
  • site assessment
  • priorities list
  • california department

  • response division
  • washington state
  • national priorities
  • ground water
  • restoration priority


    • This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
    More information on Chapter Skim is available.