Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

3 Overview of the Community Development Program
Pages 47-71

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 47...
... However, one segment of the community received little benefit: the Alaska Native fishermen of rural western Alaskan, who generally came from small villages needing economic development. The CDQ program was proposed during Congressional hearings on the 1990 47
From page 48...
... Discussions about a community development program continued in the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (NPFMC) during debates on two related issues: the split of the allocation of pollock quota between inshore and offshore processing operations and the proposed individual fishing quota (IFQ)
From page 49...
... As part of the License Limitation Program, the council recommended that all other fisheries resources managed under the Bering Sea Aleutian Island management plan be allocated to a CDQ program. However, due to the complexity of the program and other factors, a proposed rule for the multispecies CDQ was not published by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
From page 50...
... . The six primary components of this institutional structure are: the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act; the North Pacific Fishery Management Council; the National Marine Fisheries Service; the Alaska Board of Fisheries; the Alaska Department of Fish and Game; and the International Pacific Halibut Commission.
From page 51...
... Groundfish fisheries in the BSAI are managed by the Council and the National Marine Fisheries Service. The Council sets TAC levels for various target species fisheries that occur throughout the FEZ and state waters.
From page 52...
... Approximately 400 people live in these 6 villages. In 1998, APICDA received quota allocations of 16 percent of the quota for Bering Sea CDQ pollock, 10 percent of the CDQ quota for Aleutian Islands subarea CDQ sablefish, and various percentages of crab and other groundfish species
From page 53...
... Approximately 5,300 people live in these 14 villages. The quota allocations for 1998 include 20 percent of the Bering Sea CDQ pollock, 25 percent of the Aleutian Islands subarea CDQ sablefish, 23 percent of the
From page 54...
... 54 ¢ o .~ JO sin be o g Cq a' :~ o o ¢ o Cq C)
From page 55...
... ss o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o oo ~ ~ cM o oo cM ~ cM o ~oo ~ ~ ~ o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o o~ .
From page 56...
... , 30 percent of the halibut in the eastern Bering Sea region (Area 4E) , and various percentages of crab and other groundfish species (Tables 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5~.
From page 57...
... opilio Tanner 10 1919 17 18 17 100 Bering Sea C bairdi Tanner 10 1919 17 18 17 100 Sablefish & Turbot Sablefish, hook & line-AI 15 200 30 20 15 100 Turbot-AI 18 185 14 26 19 100 Sablefish hook & line-BS 15 2218 0 20 25 100 Turbot-BS 16 2514 1 20 24 100 Pacific cod 16 2010 17 18 19 100 Atka mackerel Eastern 20 1710 17 16 20 100 Central 20 1710 17 16 20 100 Western 20 1710 17 16 20 100 Yellowfin Sole 29 258 5 5 28 100 Flatfish Other flats 20 2010 15 15 20 100 Rock sole 10 2010 20 20 20 100 Flathead 20 2010 15 15 20 100 Squid 19 1810 17 16 20 100 Other species 19 229 14 14 22 100 Other Rockfish O
From page 58...
... The quota allocations for 1998 include 4 percent of the Bering Sea CDQ pollock, and various percentages of crab and other groundfish species (Tables 3.3, 3.4, and 3.5~. The Pribilof Island Fishermen's Association, which included the villages of St.
From page 59...
... The quota allocations for 1998 include 25 percent of the Bering Sea CDQ pollock, 25 percent of the Aleutian Islands management subarea of CDQ sablefish, 24 percent of the halibut in the western Bering Sea region (Area 4D) , 70 percent of the halibut in the eastern Bering Sea region (Area 4E)
From page 60...
... Additional data on the investments provided by YDFDA are provided in Appendix F ALLOCATION OF QUOTA The amount of fish quota allocated to western Alaskan communities is 7.5 percent of the total allowable catch of Bering Sea multispecies fishery, 20 percent of the BSAI sablefish, and various percentages of the halibut in Bering Sea management Areas 4A though 4E.
From page 61...
... Governance This includes setting up a management organization with a decision-making structure and executive leadership, establishing financial oversight capability, establishing recognized ties to appropriate federal and state bureaucracies, and developing acceptable Community Development Programs. It also means setting up legal arrangements for contracts and ensuring the fiduciary responsibility of the CDQ group.
From page 62...
... The initial program was developed under the direction of the North Pacific Fishery Management Council in the early 1990s with the primary aim to provide communities with the means to develop ongoing commercial fishing activities. These goals include expansion of employment opportunities in commercial fishing and processing and an increase in capital investment in fishing, processing, and infrastructure.
From page 63...
... Under community development information, topics to be covered include description of projects; allocation requested; project schedule; employment, vocational and educational programs; existing infrastructure; capital uses; short- and long-term benefits; and business information. In certain of these areas, highly detailed information is required.
From page 64...
... Expansion of the CDQ program to BSAI halibut and sablefish in 1995 resulted in awards for halibut to seven organizations. In the fall of 1995, the federally approved three-year extension of the pollock program led to another round of allocations.
From page 65...
... In fact, to a certain extent, these fleets have been regarded as the enemy over the last 20 years due to their bycatch of salmon and herring, species that are critical to the subsistence and commercial economies of the villagers. Familiarization with the industry was accomplished by pursuing contacts acquired largely at North Pacific Fishery Management Council meetings or through other segments of the fishing industry with western Alaskan operations.
From page 66...
... CDQ groups are required to develop procedures to report target species and bycatch-species harvest levels to the National Marine Fisheries Service and, in essence, to manage their own quota allocations. It is noteworthy that five of the six CDQ groups have located their main office outside the region they represent.
From page 67...
... Some ventures have been the outright purchase of vessels that are then leased to village residents for participation in local fisheries. Others have been joint venture arrangements with already existing commercial fishing vessels in which the CDQ group purchases a share of the vessel.
From page 68...
... Floating processing facilities have been a third category of equity investment pursued by one group. As the previous discussion demonstrates, equity investment strategies have
From page 69...
... One group was initially quite cautious and put off investment until the second funding cycle of the program. At present, they are one of the most active investors and have developed five equity investments in different fisheries.
From page 70...
... The most frequently undertaken project in the early years of a CDQ program is dock development or improvement. Dredging of harbors has been accomplished in two areas, two communities have received ice delivery systems, while another community has obtained a vessel storage facility.
From page 71...
... Training for higher level positions on factory trawlers has not yet materialized. One group has proposed development of an observer training program, which could be a good way for village residents to move into the management sector.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.