Toward an Earth Science Enterprise Federation Results from a Workshop (1998) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
3 Models for an Earth Science Enterprise Federation
3 Models for an Earth Science Enterprise Federation
Pages 13-18
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 13... ...
On the other hand, the federation models have the following major differences: the amount of power vested at the lowest levels varies widely; . management styles range from relatively authoritarian to relatively democratic, with the latter tending to slow decision making; leadership is visible at several levels by a prestigious person at the top (e.g., Harvard Libraries, NATO)
|
From page 14... ...
14 Cat o o .~ Ct so as as o o Cat _.
|
From page 17... ...
Based on comparison of the similarities and differences described above, and the needs of the four ESE constituencies, the Steering Committee for a Workshop on an Earth Science Enterprise Federation selected the following lessons from existing federations, which may be helpful in the design and development of an ESE federation: Lesson 1. To be successful, a federation must be a community-driven, grass-roots effort with empowerment at the individual member level.
|
From page 18... ...
76 But because the ~de~ion wiN be desired by the ESIPs Ad MESA, it will likely prove more flexible, Wattle, ad responsive to the phobties of the ESE constant
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.