Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

Chapter Seven. Delay Models
Pages 57-62

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 57...
... The total delay for each vehicle was aggregated into five minute intervals, with the delay for a given vehicle attributed to He time central in which it departed from the stop line. The average delay for a given time Interval is the sum of the total delay divided by the number of vehicles departing Dom the stop line doling that interval.
From page 58...
... The date collected et the three AWSC intersections with single lanes on each approach make up this validation data set with 125 5-minute data points. Delay Forecasts The delay forecas s were plowed against the measured field delay for Me 5-minute data for Tree single lane sites.
From page 59...
... Level of Service Ranges for Stop Controlled tcrsechons Fluid Dam 100 Figure 30. Delay Forecast, Model 1, Validation Sims 100 -, al
From page 60...
... =3 l .............. ~O O 2 O O O _ BINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The analysis presented In this working paper support several important findings pith respect to a decision on the appropriate capacity and delay models for AWSC intersections.
From page 61...
... However, this may In some cases lead to signal warrants being prematurely met Recommendations The analysis presented in this report shows that bow Delay Models 1 and 2 produce good quality forecasts. While the mode} testing results weighed slightly in favor of Delay Mode} 2, the validation study showed that Delay Mode} ~ may beige more appropriate tool.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.