Recapitalizing the Navy A Strategy for Managing the Infrastructure (1998) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix B: Analysis of Department of the Navy Funding Trends
Appendix B: Analysis of Department of the Navy Funding Trends
Pages 92-97
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 92... ...
The funding trends appear to show that force modernization bore the brunt of the overall budget reductions and then recovered {Unless otherwise noted, all data shown in this appendix are a result of the committee's use of FY 1999-2003: President's Budget Future Years Defense Programs. In addition, please note that all data are shown in constant FY 1999 budget dollars: FY 1991 through FY 1997 are actual obligations, FY 1998 is the current budget in execution, and FY 1999 is the President's budget currently being considered by Congress.
|
From page 93... ...
20 19 13 TIC o 0 17 i 16 tL in o . _ 15 14 13 12 1 1 10 Marine Corps share of DON TOA Increasing at an average annual rate of 0.3% per year 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Fiscal Year |Fiscal Year T 1991 T 1992 1 1993 1 1994 1 1995 1 1996 T 1997 T 1998 1 1999 1 |USMC T 13 5 T 14.0 1 13.9 1 14 7 1 14 5 1 15.0 T 16.0 T 15.6 1 16.2 1 FIGURE B.2 Marine Corps percentage of Department of the Navy (DON)
|
From page 94... ...
35.0 m Dig 25.0 15.D 30.0 20.0 At' Infrastructure Average Annual 8.5% Decline FY 91-94; 2.8% Decline FY 95-99 Force Operations Average Annual 4.8% Decline FY 91-94; _ 3.2% Decline FY 95-99 Force Modernization Average Annual 20.9% Decline FY 91-94; 0.9% Increase FY 95-99 · ~.v 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Fiscal Year Fiscal Year 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Modernization 38.6 31 .7 26.8 20.4 22.4 Operations ....... 27.7 26.2 27.0 23.3 22.2 Infrastructure _ .
|
From page 95... ...
The first column lists the categories; the second column is FY 1991 funding in billions of FY 1999 dollars; the third column is FY 1999 funding in billions of dollars; the fourth column shows the reduction in funding from FY 1991 to FY 1999; the fifth column lists the percent reduction by category from FY 1991 to FY 1999; the sixth column indicates the FY 1999 funding that would have occurred if each category were reduced by the same Navy Department overall percentage; and the seventh and last column represents the difference between actual FY 1999 funding and the normalized FY 1999 funding. This last column indicates the degree to which a category had funding transferred either into it (a positive number)
|
From page 96... ...
of the Navy Department budget or it is necessary to continue to increase the Marine Corps share of the budget, the $3.5 billion figure must be adjusted upward accordingly. For the reasons articulated in Chapter 1, the committee focused its review on the approximate half of the Navy infrastructure that is more closely associated with the N4 organization (i.e., those portions of the infrastructure concentrated on base closure and environmental compliance, installations (less base closure)
|
From page 97... ...
Research, Development, - Test, and Evaluation $0.1 B - 0 9% Procurement $0.3B - 2.5% Military Construction $1.5B- 11.2% FIGURE B.7 Navy infrastructure by appropriation initially considered by the committee. Data shown are average values from FY 1995 to FY 1999.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.