Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

8 Labor-Management Relations
Pages 61-67

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 61...
... In traditional adversarial conditions, union and management can benefit from a large number of narrow job classifications. Management pays the average worker less for performing relatively low-.killed jobs, while the union has more workers employed as well as an elaborate job security mechanism to protect workers with high seniority in specific job classifications.
From page 62...
... Committee evidence suggests that some managers are reversing a pattern of recent decades and assigning multiskilled tasks to workers in the bargaining unit. Direct consideration and discussion of these issues is a necessary part of implementation planning for ANT in unionized workplaces.
From page 63...
... use the quality of the relationship as a criterion for deciding whether to invest in a particular plant. National contracts affecting most of the unionized sites visited require management to notify the union of plans to introduce new technology.
From page 64...
... All three sites are existing plants in which the Majority of workers held traditional jobs: seniority is plantwide, so workers with high seniority in such jobs can bump down to lower-rated jobs to avoid being laid off. With the new job classification, management gains come flexibility in assignments and assures continuity for workers it trains for ANT jobs.
From page 65...
... It will be difficult for union and manageannt to agree on reducing job classifications when bumping rights and shift preferences are based on seniority in classifications. A system of radically fewer job classifications is more likely to be accepted in a new, highly automated plant than is a gradual shift to fewer classifications in an existing plant.
From page 66...
... at Ford Motor Company. None of the companies visited reported any involuntary loss of employment directly attributable to technological change.
From page 67...
... Planning for a gradual buildup to full capacity may permit a more predictable increase in the personnel needed to operate the plant and avoid the need to lay off people later. Personnel planning requires care in both unionized and nonunionized settings.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.