Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

C PNGV Response to the Phase 1 Report and Supporting Documentation
Pages 100-109

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 100...
... Appendix C PNGV Response to the Phase 1 Report and Supporting Documentation
From page 101...
... We have studied these carefully and believe all were helpful perspectives, even when we disagree somewhat on the details. We would like to respond briefly here to some of the major recommendations and offer more detailed dialog during the next peer review.
From page 102...
... The NRC also recommended that the industry PNGV effort be led by a single technical director in charge of an integrated platform development team at USCAR. We agree that establishing a vehicle perspective is important and while we do not have a complete answer as yet, the industry does plan to add experienced vehicle engineers to each company PNGV team in the near future to guide the technology development program as it evolves.
From page 103...
... The OSG and technical teams concur with the peer review about the significance of infrastructure issues on PNGV and vice versa. However, by definition, PNGV is focused on the vehicle, except where infrastructure considerations affect cost.
From page 104...
... Clarification left for future contact. "We believe that the PNGV technology strategy is better defined than we were able to effectively communicate to the review panel....roadmaps have been completed and documented for all breakthrough vehicle technologies and our manufacturing and conventional vehicle programs have both continued to advance in planning and execution." "All three phases of the PNGV program have inadequately defined and staffed program management structures in both government and industry organizaiions....The government...needs to have a strong and effective central program management office...
From page 105...
... "The committee recommends the establishment of clearly defined mechanisms in fiscal year 1996 for allocating and managing program resources, for selecting and integrating technologies and for assessing total costs and benefits. " Response: No specific comment.
From page 106...
... "We agree that establishing a vehicle perspective is important and while we do not have a complete answer yet, the industry does plan to add experienced vehicle engineers to each company's PNGV team in the near future to Wide the technology development program as it evolves. Also our view at this time is that each company will pursue separate concept vehicles and production prototypes." (5.)
From page 107...
... Recommendation: Supplier and Universit. Involvement "The committee was informed that several workshops are being planned in the upcoming months to explore with university and industry representatives the scientific, engineering, and technological issues posed by the PNGV program....The committee recommends that the PNGV workshop structure be quickly expanded to more effectively involve these constituents and to provide them with a link to the PNGV program.
From page 108...
... Regarded as "...integral parts of He PNGV program systems analysis..." However, "PNGV is focused on He vehicle, except where infrastructure considerations affect cost....~frastructure issues must involve a broad national dialog ...and we expect to be a participant in Hose discussions." (9.) Recommendation: Peer Reviews of the PNGV "The.
From page 109...
... " Response: Need acknowledged. "We would like to respond briefly here to some of the major recommendations and offer more detailed dialog during We next peer review." (10.)


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.