Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

2: Derivation of Reference Doses
Pages 17-23

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 17...
... Those methods were based on the procedures outlined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for Superfund risk assessment guidelines (EPA 1989)
From page 18...
... , UF1 represents the expected ratio of the LOAEL to the NOAEL when a LOAEL is used instead of a NOAEL, IS represents the uncertainty of predicting chronic exposure effects on the basis of subchronic exposure studies, UFD represents the uncertainty assigned to an inadequate data base, and ME is a modifying factor to account for any additional uncertainty not addressed by the standard uncertainty factors. Typically, uncertainty factors are assigned values ranging from ~ to 10.
From page 19...
... A modifying factor between ~ and 10 is used when the five uncertainty factors do not explicitly account for all scientific uncertainties that exist. The default value for the modifying factor is I
From page 20...
... Environmental Protection Agency (EPA 1996) , a BD approach based on uncertainty factors is one of the methods suggested when a nonlinear dose response is expected (e.g., for nongenotoxic carcinogens or tumor promoters)
From page 21...
... Thus, it appears that the conventional products of 10 for default values of uncertainty factors provide reasonable assurance of safety.
From page 22...
... EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency)
From page 23...
... 1995. Selecting a more realistic uncertainty factor: Reducing compounding effects of multiple uncertainties.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.