Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

V. Cellular/Molecular Biology Programs
Pages 79-98

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 79...
... On the average, 34 full-time and part-time students intending to earn doctorates were enrolled in a program in December 1980, with an average faculty size of 26 members.2 Roughly half of the 89 programs, listed in Table 5.1' are located in departments of biology or biological sciences and one-fourth in departments of cellular or molecular biology. The remainder are in departments of anatomy, genetics, and other biological sciences.
From page 80...
... For eight of the measures, data are reported for at least 77 of the 89 cellular/molecular biology programs. For measures 04-07, which pertain to characteristics of the program graduates, data are presented for only approximately two-thirds of the programs; the other third had too few graduates on which to base statistics .4 For measure 12, a composite index of the size of a university library, data are available for 63 programs; for measure 14, the total university expenditures for research in the biological sciences, data are available for 67 programs.
From page 81...
... Since a large majority of faculty evaluators indicated that they were unfamiliar with this program and it is quite possible that some of them were misled by the inaccurate identification of this institution, the committee has decided not to report the survey results for this program. To assist the reader in interpreting results of the survey evaluations, estimated standard errors have been computed for mean ratings of the scholarly quality of faculty in 86 cellular/molecular biology programs (and are given in Table 5.1~.
From page 82...
... 11 43 NA NA 19 .80 NA 45 58 16 44 10 43 26 48 30 49 35 50 32 49 44 53 25 47 114 75 43 53 47 54 33 50 35 50 19 45 50 55 98 70 24 47 14 44 NA NA NA NA .83 6 59 .46 5.3 45 61 .27 7.3 38 34 .31 7.0 39 38 .69 6.1 54 50 .67 6.0 53 52 .25 8.5 37 18 .60 4.5 50 72 .81 6.1 58 50 .77 5.7 57 56 .69 5.4 54 60 .40 7.8 43 28 .91 6.2 62 49 .18 6.8 34 41 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 6.0 .83 .17 52 53 24 .85 .54 54 48 .46 .27 18 31 .60 .07 3? 17 .88 .69 57 58 .88 .69 57 58 .77 .43 47 41 .87 .67 56 57 .90 .63 59 55 .86 .57 55 50 .74 .58 45 51 .80 .50 50 46 .83 .73 53 61 .70 .30 41 33 NA NA NA NA NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 83...
... 0.7 NA 49 1.0 NA 56 0.7 NA 50 0.4 0.9 42 56 0.1 NA 36 1.1 59 0.4 43 0.1 36 1.2 60 0.9 53 0.4 42 0.9 55 1.6 71 1.5 68 1.2 62 0.4 42 1.4 66 0.7 50 0.5 44 0.9 53 NA —0.4 44 NA NA -1.1 37 NA NA NA 2.2 69 2.0 67 —1 .0 38 —0.0 47 —O . 1 47 -1 .3 35 0.9 56 _ 56 56 .50 NA 44 .21 NA 31 .88 5487 61 43 .63 NA 49 .24 NA 32 .85 6547 59 44 .91 5446 62 43 .8 6 18977 60 63 .8 6 15581 60 58 .38 6232 38 44 .74 8706 54 48 .59 NA 48 .70 7721 53 46 NA 17589 61 Research Published Supoor t Art icles (13)
From page 84...
... (07) NA NA NA NA 1.00 6.3 66 48 .10 5.2 31 63 .68 5.8 53 54 .75 6.3 56 48 .85 6.7 60 42 .42 5.4 43 60 NA NA .73 6.1 55 50 .46 6.9 45 40 .57 5.5 49 59 .89 5.7 62 56 NA NA .60 6.2 50 49 .78 5.9 57 53 NA NA .96 6.3 64 47 .22 6.5 36 45 NA NA NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 85...
... 1.9 1.2 0.9 0.3 0.1 .50 3161 51 .23 .18 .09 .06 39 32 36 41 49 44 39 44 43 040. 0.4 NA NA 0.1 NA NA NA 0 .16 NA NA .03 23 35 39 40 NOTE: On the f irst line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 86...
... indicates program was initiated since 1970. NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 87...
... 3.4 2.1 1.2 1.0 -0.5 .82 10337 226 .09 .07 .10 .08 55 55 49 57 42 58 50 57 56 060. 1.5 NA NA 0.1 NA .40 NA 20 .24 NA NA .04 35 36 39 41 41 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 88...
... NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10. "NA" indicates that the value for a measure is not available.
From page 90...
... Washington, University of-Seattle 17 28 8 .96 5.0 .96 .74 Genetics 46 52 42 64 66 65 62 087. Wayne State University 16 NA NA NA NA NA NA Biological Sciences 46 088.
From page 91...
... 4.6 2.5 1.4 1.5 1.6 .79 19738 561 .07 .06 .07 .07 67 66 58 67 63 57 65 84 82 089. 4.7 2.7 1.4 1.7 2.1 .78 4337 511 .07 .07 .08 .06 69 70 59 72 68 56 41 80 84 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 92...
... 92 TABLE 5.2 Summary Statistics Describing Each Program Measure -- Cellular/Molecular Biology Number of Programs Standard D E C I ~ E S Measure Evaluated Mean Deviation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ~ 9 Program Size 01 Raw Value 89 26 22 8 10 13 16 18 21 26 36 49 Std Value 89 SO 10 42 43 44 46 47 48 50 55 61 02 Raw Value 82 23 21 4 9 11 13 17 19 25 29 44 Std Value 82 50 10 41 43 44 45 47 48 51 53 60 03 Raw Value 86 34 32 7 10 16 19 25 32 36 49 66 Std Value 86 50 10 42 43 44 45 47 49 51 55 60 Program Graduates 04 Raw Value 59 .59 .26 .22 .31 .42 .54 .63 .70 .78 .84 .88 Std Value 59 50 10 36 39 43 48 52 54 57 60 61 05 Raw Value 57 6.1 .7 7.0 6.7 6.4 6.3 6.2 6.0 5.8 5.5 5.4 Std Value 57 50 10 38 42 46 48 49 52 54 59 60 57 .80 .11 .65 .70 .76 .78 .80 .83 .86 .90 .92 57 50 10 36 41 46 48 50 53 55 59 61 07 Raw Value 57 .56 .15 .35 .46 .52 .55 .58 .62 .65 .70 .73 Std Value 57 50 10 36 43 47 49 51 54 56 59 61 Survey Results 08 Raw Value 86 2.9 1.0 1.6 2.1 2.6 2.8 2.9 3.2 3.4 3.7 4.1 Std Value 86 50 10 36 41 47 49 50 53 55 58 62 09 Raw Value 74 1.9 .4 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.4 Std Value 74 50 10 38 43 43 48 51 ~ 53 53 58 63 10 Raw Value 68 1.2 .2 .9 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 Std Value 68 50 10 37 41 45 45 50 54 58 58 63 11 Raw Value 88 .7 .4 .2 .3 .4 .6 .7 .8 1.0 1.1 1.4 Std Value 88 50 10 38 40 42 47 49 52 56 59 66 University Library 12 Raw Value 63 .3 1.0 -1.0 -.6 -.5 -.4 .0 .3 .9 1.0 1.8 Std Value 63 50 10 38 42 43 44 48 50 56 57 65 Research Support 13 Raw Value 77 .64 .22 .28 .41 .55 .63 .71 .75 .78 .83 .86 Std Value 77 50 10 34 40 46 50 53 55 56 59 60 14 Raw Value 67 10243 6479 3421 4681 5829 6530 8079 9947 13578 15814 17589 Std Value 67 50 10 39 41 43 44 47 50 55 59 61 Publication Records 15 Raw Value 85 133 127 15 39 48 62 86 98 146 234 325 Std Value 85 50 10 41 43 43 44 46 47 51 58 65 16 Std Value 85 50 10 41 42 43 45 46 48 51 61 64 NOTE: Standardized values reported in the preceding table have been computed from exact values of the mean and standard deviation and not the rounded values reported here. Since the scale used to compute measure 16 is entirely arbitrary, only data in standardized form are reported for this measure.
From page 93...
... 93 TABLE 5.3 Intercorrelations Among Program Measures on 89 Programs in Cellular/Molecular Biology Measure 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Program Size 01 .54 .55 .03 -.16 -.09 -.01 .39 .29 .28 .37 .16 .06 .16 .37 .37 02 .83 .16 -.11 .12 -.02 .42 .47 .09 .40 .19 .18 .02 .32 .34 03 .07 -.06 .12 .02 .43 .39 .20 .43 .12 .16 .02 .32 .35 Program Graduates 04 .13 .32 .29 .58 .51 .10 .54 .34 .55 .30 .42 .42 05 .44 .48 .38 .42 .31 .37 .36 .39 .25 .26 .29 06 .57 .33 .34 .16 .32 .26 .18 .18 ,23 .26 07 .41 .35 .10 .48 .13 .48 .20 .29 .32 Survey Results 08 ~ .96 .33 .94 .47 .58 .57 .69 .71 09 .33 .91 .37 .51 .47 .56 .61 10 .31 .06 .19 -.16 .15 .17 11 .45 .65 .58 .70 .74 University Library 12 Research Support 13 14 Publication Records 15 16 .24 .42 .59 .59 .24 .40 .40 .58 .59 .99 NOTE: Since in computing correlation coefficients program data must be available for both of the measures being correlated, the actual number of programs on which each coefficient is based varies.
From page 94...
... -- 86 programs in cellular/molecular biology.
From page 95...
... -- 69 programs in cellular/molecular biology .
From page 96...
... 96 TABLE 5.4 Characteristics of Survey Participants in Cellular/ Molecular Biology Respondents N % Field of Specialization Biochemistry 17 12 Cell Biology 32 23 Genetics 22 16 Molecular Biology 34 25 Other/Unknown 34 25 Faculty Rank Professor 63 45 Associate Professor 46 33 Assistant Professor 30 22 Year of Highest Degree Pre-1950 6 4 1950-59 29 21 1960-69 45 32 Post-1969 58 42 Unknown 1 1 Evaluator Selection Nominated by Institution 113 81 Other 26 19 Survey Form With Faculty Names 130 94 Without Names 9 7 Total Evaluators 139 100
From page 97...
... indicate a confidence interval of +1.5 standard errors around the reported mean (x) of each program.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.