Skip to main content

Currently Skimming:

III. Chemical Engineering Programs
Pages 33-50

The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.


From page 33...
... For 10 of the measures, data are reported for at least 69 of the 79 chemical engineering programs. For measures 04-07, which pertain to characteristics of the program graduates, data are presented for only approximately threefourths of the programs; the other fourth had too few graduates on which to base statistics.4 For measure 12, a composite index of the Data from the NRC's Survey of Earned Doctorates indicate that 1,453 research doctorates in chemical engineering were awarded by U.S.
From page 34...
... These individuals constituted 69 percent of those asked to respond to the survey in this discipline and 17 percent of the faculty population in the 79 researchdoctorate programs being evaluated.s More than one-third of the survey participants had earned their highest degree since 1970, and a majority held the rank of full professor. To assist the reader in interpreting results of the survey evaluations, estimated standard errors have been computed for mean ratings of the scholarly quality of faculty in 79 chemical engineering programs (and are given in Table 3.1~.
From page 35...
... 35 of the mean ratings of higher-rated programs than lower-rated programs This generalization results primarily from the fact that evaluators are not as likely to be familiar with the less prestigious-programs, and consequently the mean ratings of these programs are usually based on fewer survey responses.
From page 36...
... Connecticut, University of-Storrs 12 7 12 NA NA NA NA Chemical Engineering 49 42 44 017. Cornell University-Ithaca 15 14 26 .00 5.3 .75 .00 Chemical Engineering 55 4 7 51 33 59 4 8 34 018.
From page 38...
... Montana State University-Bozeman 5 6 4 NA NA NA NA Chemical Engineering 35 41 41 040. New Jersey Institute of Technology 28 4 NA NA NA NA NA Chemistry and Chemical Engineering 81 40 *
From page 39...
... . 1 47 NA -0.3 45 0.2 50 -0.3 45 -0.7 41 0.3 51 1.8 65 1.2 59 —0.2 g6 NA NA NA Research Published Suppor t Ar ticles (13)
From page 40...
... (07) 5~3 .86 58 57 6.2 .70 46 44 4.2 .77 73 49 6.1 .89 47 59 7.5 1.00 30 67 .15 6.1 43 47 NA NA NA NA NA NA .25 6.4 50 44 .08 6.4 38 44 NA NA .71 45 NA 6.8 .77 38 49 .33 5.6 56 54 .08 5.0 38 62 67 7.3 .64 32 40 5.1 .87 61 57 5.1 .82 61 53 NA NA :~.1 .95 61 63 .93 62 .92 61 5.5 .67 56 42 NA NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 41...
... 3.1 1.7 1.0 1.2 0.3 .62 3019 15 .07 .05 .08 .06 55 52 46 56 51 65 45 56 56 060. 1.3 0.7 0.9 0.3 NA NA 1745 0 .14 .10 .05 .05 36 33 45 34 43 3 8 39 NOTE: On the first line of data for every program, raw values for each measure are reported; on the second line values are reported in standardized form, with mean = 50 and standard deviation = 10.
From page 42...
... Wisconsin, University of-Madison 17 46 76 .36 5.0 .86 .24 Chemical Engineering 59 71 74 58 63 56 60 078. Worcester Polytechnic Institute 8 7 7 NA NA NA NA Chemical Engineering 41 42 42 079 .
From page 43...
... in Chemical Engineering Published Articles (15)
From page 44...
... 44 TABLE 3.2 summary Statistics Describing Each Program Measure -- Chemical Engineering Measure _ Program Size 01 Raw Value Std Value 02 Raw Value Std Value 03 Raw Value Std Value Program Graduates 04 Raw Value Std Value 05 Raw Value Std Value 06 Raw Value Std Value 07 Raw Value Std Value Survey Results 08 Raw Value Std Value 09 Raw Value Std Value 10 Raw Value Std Value 11 Raw Value Std Value University Library 12 Raw Value Std Value Number of Programs Standard Evaluated Mean Deviation 79 79 79 79 77 77 12 50 18 50 24 50 56 .25 56 50 55 5.9 55 50 57 .78 57 50 57 .15 57 50 79 2.7 79 50 79 1.6 79 50 79 1.1 79 50 79 .9 79 50 52 52 10 13 10 22 10 .14 10 .8 10 .13 10 .09 10 1.0 10 .5 10 .3 10 .4 10 .2 1.0 50 10 D E C I L E S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7 9 39 43 5 6 40 41 5 9 41 43 .09 .14 39 42 7.2 6.5 34 43 .59 .65 35 40 .02 .06 36 40 1.6 1.8 39 41 .9 1.1 37 41 .7 .9 35 43 .4 .5 37 40 -1.0 -.6 38 42 9 10 43 45 9 11 43 45 12 13 44 45 .18 .20 45 46 6.3 6.2 45 47 .73 .77 46 49 ·09 .10 43 44 2.1 2.4 44 47 1.3 1.5 45 48 .9 1.0 43 47 .7 .7 45 45 11 47 14 47 16 46 .24 49 5.9 50 .80 52 .14 49 2.5 48 1.6 50 1.0 47 .8 47 _.5 _.4 -.1 43 44 47 12 14 49 53 16 22 49 53 20 27 48 51 .26 .27 51 51 5.6 5.4 54 57 .82 .84 53 55 .16 .20 51 56 2.7 3.0 50 54 1.7 1.8 52 54 1.1 1.2 51 55 .9 1.1 50 55 8 9 16 19 57 63 27 33 57 61 33 56 54 65 .30 .37 54 59 5.3 5.0 58 62 .87 .93 57 62 .22 .26 58 62 3.4 4.0 58 64 2.0 2.3 58 63 1.3 1.5 58 66 1.3 1.5 60 65 .8 1.3 1 56 60 L.8 65 Research Support 13 Raw Value 55 .37 .17 .18 .21 .28 .31 .34 .40 .45 .50 .60 Std Value 55 50 10 39 41 45 46 48 52 55 58 64 14 Raw Value 69 7819 8858 1830 2351 2764 4067 4599 5336 7993 10599 18340 Std Value 69 50 10 43 44 44 46 46 47 50 53 62 Publication Records 15 Raw Value 79 10 8 1 3 4 6 8 9 11 15 22 Std Value 79 50 10 40 42 43 45 48 49 51 56 64 16 Std Value 79 50 10 40 42 43 46 48 49 52 56 61 NOTE: Standardized values reported in the preceding table have been computed from exact values of the mean and standard deviation and not the rounded values reported here. Since the scale used to compute measure 16 is entirely arbitrary, only data in standardized form are reported for this measure.
From page 45...
... 45 TABLE 3.3 Intercorrelations Among Program Measures on 79 Programs in Chemical Engineering Measure 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Program Size 01 .53 .52 -.11 .20 .07 .09 .51 .49 .22 .46 .18 .01 .48 .42 .46 02 .82 .00 .32 .22 .14 .83 .83 .07 .79 .40 .45 .42 .66 .69 03 .07 .36 .31 .20 .77 .75 .11 .76 .42 .43 .50 .61 .65 Program Graduates 04 .00 .09 .13 .20 .18 .00 .18 -.28 .17 -.02 .08 .07 05 .20 .10 .43 .44 .21 .44 .22 .31 .00 .30 .30 06 .24 .27 .28 .18 .21 -.12 .07 .07 .15 .23 07 .25 .23 .27 .28 -.04 .03 .02 .06 .14 Survey Results 08 .99 .31 .96 .41 .62 .42 .65 .65 09 .29 .95 .40 .61 .41 .64 .63 10 .30 -.14 .01 .18 .36 .34 11 .61 .41 .67 .68 University Library 12 .31 .21 .11 .12 Research Support 13 .09 .31 .35 14 .39 .35 Publication Records 15 .96 16 NOTE: Since in computing correlation coefficients program data must be available for both of the measures being correlated, the actual number of programs on which each coefficient is based varies.
From page 46...
... -- 79 programs in chemical engineering.
From page 47...
... -- 79 programs in chemical engineering.
From page 48...
... 48 TABLE 3.4 Characteristics of Survey Participants in Chemical Engineering Respondents N % Field of Specialization ~ Chemical Engineering 159 97 Other/Unknown 5 3 Faculty Rank Professor 99 60 Associate Professor 35 21 Assistant Professor 30 18 Year of Highest Degree Pre-1950 6 4 1950-59 38 23 1960-69 59 36 Post-1969 61 37 Evaluator Selection Nominated by Institution 145 88 Other 19 12 Survey Form With Faculty Names 151 92 Without Names 13 8 Total Evaluators 164 100
From page 49...
... indicate a confidence interval of t1.5 standard errors around the reported mean (x) of each program.


This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More information on Chapter Skim is available.