Alternatives for High-Level Waste Salt Processing at the Savannah River Site (2000) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Summary
Summary
Pages 1-4
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 1... ...
. Was the process used to screen the alternatives technically sound and did its application result in the selection of appropriate preferred alternatives?
|
From page 2... ...
. At this point DOE requested that the National Research Council undertake the current study to review both the selection process and the processing options themselves, which included the primary and backup options along with two other options that were eliminated by SRS in the final stages of screening: caustic sicle so/vent extraction and direct grout.
|
From page 3... ...
The committee recommends that Savannah River proceed with a carefully planned and managed research and development (R&D) program for three of the four alternative processing options (small tank precipitation using TPB, crystalline silicotitanate ion exchange, and caustic side solvent extraction, each including monosoclium titanate processing for removing strontium and actinides)
|
From page 4... ...
~/~r -/ ~~ If Froce66- ~' ~8 ~6 R~r ~~ ous ~commendabons ~ this mpod on the elements of an Waive R&D program 10 address the remaining science and technical uncehainDes with each of the Cur alternative processing options. R&D plans were being made by DOE as Me committee finalized this Upon, so the committee has not had Be oppoduni~ ~ ~i~ and Squaw the final Man and id purges.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.