National Academies Press: OpenBook

Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies (2006)

Chapter: Appendix A Statement of Task

« Previous: 5 Toward Adaptive Managment
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Statement of Task." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11481.
×

Appendixes

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Statement of Task." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11481.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Statement of Task." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11481.
×

Appendix A
Statement of Task

The Committee shall perform an independent review of the Lake Ontario/St. Lawrence River reports in the following areas: wetlands science and species at risk, the Flood Erosion and Prediction System (FEPS), the Integrated Ecological Response Models (IERM), and the Shared Vision Model (SVM). The level of emphasis for these various areas shall be approximately as follows: wetlands 15%, species at risk 15%, FEPS 10%, IERM 20%, SVM 40%, and reflect the International Joint Commission’s (IJC) determination of its priorities in this effort.

The overarching charge shall be to evaluate the appropriateness and sufficiency of the studies and models used to inform decisions related to regulation plan options. Recommendations shall be limited to those deriving from this overarching charge and shall not address management or policy issues.

The Lake Ontario/St. Lawrence River program science, as represented in the reports and model documentation provided (items in articles 11K and 11L), shall be reviewed by the Committee in terms of the degree to which:

  1. the models and reports are sufficient and appropriate to evaluate the various regulation plan options (RPOs) and impacts of changes in water levels and flows;

  2. the studies reflect reasonable scientific methods, assumptions and supported findings;

  3. the models sufficiently and appropriately integrate and display the key information needed for a comprehensive evaluation and understanding of the tradeoffs for selecting among the candidate RPOs.

The review shall be limited to critical evaluation and decision components of the topics listed that relate directly to the Lake Ontario/St. Lawrence River regulation plan options. This requirement shall further be interpreted to restrict the review to the impact of changing regulation levels and flows, within the limits that these two factors can be managed using the currently existing control structures and the hydrology/hydraulic characteristics of the system. The review shall neither compare regulation plan options nor provide advice on the preference of one regulation plan option over another, as these actions fall directly within the decision-making responsibilities of the Commission.

Documents to be Reviewed

The following Government owned reports, compute models, and developed data are considered essential to the successful performance under this contract and shall be provided to the Committee by the United States Section of the Interna-

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Statement of Task." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11481.
×

tional Joint Commission.

Wetlands, and Species at Risk – SAR

LOWER ST. LAWRENCE SPECIES AT RISK Sylvain Giguere and Pierre Laporte, Reports 2003-2004, & Mar. 2005 pending.

SELECTED PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP (LOWER ST. LAWRENCE). Jean Morin et al., October 2004.

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF LAKE ONTARIO WATER LEVEL REGULATION ON WETLAND PLANT COMMUNITY ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION Joel Ingram, Nancy Patterson et al., Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ontario Region

MODELS FOR SUBMERGED VEGETATION AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES INDUCED BY DISCHARGE (WATER LEVEL) VARIATIONS IN THE ST. LAWRENCE RIVER (QUÉBEC) Christiane Hudon, Pierre Gagnon et al. St. Lawrence Centre, Environment Canada, Montreal, December 2003

HISTORICAL CHANGES IN HERBACEOUS WETLAND DISTRIBUTION AND BIOMASS : EFFECTS OF HYDROLOGY ON FAUNAL HABITATS IN LAKE ST. PIERRE (ST. LAWRENCE RIVER, QUEBEC, CANADA) Christiane Hudon, Pierre Gagnon et al., Environment Canada, St. Lawrence Centre, Montreal

Context reference already published Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2004

Hudon, Christiane, SHIFT IN WETLAND COMPOSITION AND BIOMASS FOLLOWING LOW-LEVEL EPISODES IN THE ST. LAWRENCE RIVER: LOOKING INTO THE FUTURE

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN LAKE ONTARIO WATER LEVELS AND WETLANDS, U.S. YEAR 3 REPORT FOR THE WETLAND HABITAT QUANTITY PERFORMANCE INDICATOR STUDY. Douglas A. Wilcox, Kurt P. Kowalski, and Martha L. Carlson. (200 page report: 45 pages of text, tables and figures, remainder is appendices with detailed tabular plant quadrat sampling results. Analysis includes all 32 study sites, including data from 16 CND sites).

EVALUATION OF WATER LEVEL REGULATION INFLUENCES ON LAKE ONTARIO AND UPPER ST. LAWRENCE RIVER COASTAL WETLAND PLANT COMMUNITIES ––FINAL PROJECT REPORT Douglas Wilcox, Joel Ingram, Kurt Kowalski Martha Carlson, Greg Grabas, Krista Holmes and Nancy Patterson. 100+ pages, Multi-year, binational report on all wetland work completed during the study.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Statement of Task." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11481.
×

Giguère, S. et P. Laporte (2003) LES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL INFLUENCÉES PAR LA GESTION DES NIVEAUX D’’EAU DU SAINT-LAURENT FLUVIAL (CORNWALL –– TROIS RIVIÈRES). Rapport annuel déposé à la CMI (2002-2003). Environnement Canada, Région du Québec, Service canadien de la faune, 179 p.

Giguère, S, J. Morin, P. Laporte and Mingelbier, M. (2005) Évaluation des impacts des fluctuations hydrologiques sur les espèces en péril. Tronçon fluvial du Saint-Laurent (Cornwall –– Pointe-du-Lac). Rapport final déposé à CMI (2002 - 2005). Environnement Canada, Région du Québec, Service canadien de la faune, 100 p. + appendix (litterature review = 100 p.)

Species At Risk Performance Indicator Documents

(aa) Black Tern

(ab) Least Bittern

(ac) Lower St. Lawrence River Bridle Shiner

(ad) Lower St. Lawrence River Eastern Sand Darter

(ae) Lower St. Lawrence Softshell Turtle

(af) Lake Ontario Meadow Marsh

(ag) King Rail and Yellow Rail

The following documents will become available at the end of March 2005 or shortly thereafter:

(baa) Lower river wetlands report (vegetation PI)

(bb) Least Bittern (Lake Ontario) and Least bittern (Lower River, Lake St. Louis to Trois Rivières) reproductive index

(bc) Fish SARs report (supplement to overall SAR report)

(bd) Bird SARs report supplement to overall SAR report

(be) Black Tern Reproductive Index. Drolet, Ingram and DesGranges.

(bf) Least Bittern Reproductive Index. Giguèère, Ingram, Drolet, DesGranges & Laporte

(bg) Lower St Lawrence River SAR 2002-2003 Report (explains which species were looked at, which species were selected to focus on, and reasons leading to these choices) (in French)

(bh) 2003-2004 Report, (includes literature reviews for all selected species, reasons why some of these species were discarded from the study, all work that supports developed performance indicators) (in French)

(bi) SAR report for Lake Ontario and the upper St. Lawrence River (will include discussion of all work over the last 2 years; including basic information on birds and fish, which we expect will be detailed in additional reports (in French)

(bj) General introduction and overview of ETWG study and ETWG Contextual Narrative

IERM (Integrated Ecological Response Model)

A version of the IERM model (to enable reviews to gain hands-on experience,

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Statement of Task." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11481.
×

and see how information is displayed).

Summary Documentation and Users’ Manual for IERM (contains a listing of all key performance indicators and the Plan Formulation and Evaluation Group’s template).

FEPS (Flood Erosion Prediction System)

A version of the FEPS model (to enable reviewers to gain hands-on experience and see how information is displayed.)

Automated Lake- wide Flooding Predictions and Economic Damages on Lake Ontario Peter J. Zuzek, MES, P.Geo. and Dr. Robert B. Nairn, P.Eng. (10 pages)

Automated Lake- wide Erosion Predictions and Economic Damages on Lake

Ontario Dr. Robert B. Nairn, P.Eng. and Peter J. Zuzek, (10 pages)

SVM (Shared Vision Model)

A version of the SVM (to enable reviewers to gain hands-on experience and see how the information is displayed.)

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Statement of Task." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11481.
×
Page 131
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Statement of Task." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11481.
×
Page 132
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Statement of Task." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11481.
×
Page 133
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Statement of Task." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11481.
×
Page 134
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Statement of Task." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11481.
×
Page 135
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Statement of Task." National Research Council. 2006. Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11481.
×
Page 136
Next: Appendix B Document and Models for Review and Background »
Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies Get This Book
×
 Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Studies
Buy Paperback | $52.00 Buy Ebook | $41.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Since the 1950s,the International Joint Commission (IJC) of Canada and the United States has issued water regulation and management plans for Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River. Changes in recreational, environmental, navigational and other uses of the water system have prompted the IJC to consider replacing the current water regulation plan in operation for more than 40 years. IJC’s goals for a replacement plan include sound scientific foundations, public participation, transparency in plan development and evaluation, and inclusion of environmental considerations. To help develop and select the new plan, the IJC supported a 5-year, $20 million Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Study (LOSLR Study). The LOSLR Study uses models to compile and integrate data gathered from a series of commissioned studies of wetlands, species at risk, recreational boating, fisheries, coastal erosion and flooding, commercial navigation, hydropower, industrial, municipal and domestic water intakes, public information and education, and hydrologic modeling.

This report reviews a portion of the study that focused on wetlands and species at risk and three of the models that were used. The report finds that the overall breadth of the LOSLR study is impressive, and commends the scale and inclusiveness of the studies and models. In terms of informing decision making, however, the reviewed studies and models show deficiencies when evaluated against ten evaluation criteria, including treatment of uncertainty, quality control/quality assurance, thorough documentation, and empirical foundations. Among the report’s recommendations is a need for more thorough documentation of study methods and findings, stronger and more consistent quality control, and more attention to how uncertainty should be addressed to better inform decision making. This NRC study was conducted in collaboration with the Royal Society of Canada.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!