Transportation Technology Transfer: Successes, Challenges, and Needs (2005) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Appendix B - Survey Respondents and Conducted Interviews
Appendix B - Survey Respondents and Conducted Interviews
Pages 67-68
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 67... ...
Center Michael Bonini and William Pogash, Pennsylvania DOT Ken Kobetsky, AASHTO Wes Lum, California DOT Richard McReynolds, Kansas DOT Leni Oman, Washington State DOT Dennis Trusty, Northern Plains TTAP Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New York Ohio Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Texas Utah Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Canadian province: Quebec Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire Northern Plains*
|
From page 68... ...
E-mails and telephone discussion follow-up were conducted with approximately one-quarter of the Technology Transfer Toolbox survey respondents. In addition to interviews with state DOT research managers, the following FHWA and University researchers were also interviewed: Federal Highway Representatives Resource Centers • Thay Bishop, Finance Technical Service Team Leader, Atlanta, GA • Pat Hasson, Safety and Highway Design Technical Service Team Leader, Olympia Fields, IL • Peter Osborne, Hydraulics and Geotechnical Service Team Leader, Baltimore, MD • Susanna Reck, Technology Deployment Specialist, Lakewood, CO Division Offices • David Pamplin, Quality, Research and Technology Deployment Team, Indiana • Mary Stringfellow, Technology Management Systems Engineer, Louisiana University Representatives (including Technology Transfer Professionals)
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.