Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs (2010) / Chapter Skim
Currently Skimming:
Pages 81-83
The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 81... ...
The Oregon and Utah DOTs filed SEP-14 applications to receive permission to use CMR project delivery on their federally funded CMR projects. All four cases show a means to overcome a legislative barrier to using CMR for a specific project: requesting an exception to policy or a waiver of law.
|
From page 82... ...
In highway work, the Federal Highway Administration requires that a minimum of 30% of the work be self performed. The surveys were sent to the state construction engineers, and although the responses were anonymous, the potential exists that these perceptions are held by the upper managers that make the project delivery method decisions.
|
From page 83... ...
Not all projects and all employees are suitable for all project delivery methods. Chapter three discusses the project criteria that promote the use of CMR.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.