Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
SPECIAL REPORT 312 Transportation Investments in Response to Economic Downturns Committee on Economic and Employment Benefits of Transportation Investments in Response to Economic Downturns TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES Transportation Research Board Washington, D.C. 2014 www.TRB.org
Transportation Research Board Special Report 312 Subscriber Categories: Administration and management, finance, economics Transportation Research Board publications are available by ordering individual publi- cations directly from the TRB Business Office, through the Internet at www.TRB.org or nationalacademies.org/trb, or by annual subscription through organizational or indi- vidual affiliation with TRB. Affiliates and library subscribers are eligible for substantial discounts. For further information, contact the Transportation Research Board Business Office, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001 (telephone 202-334-3213; fax 202- 334-2519; or e-mail TRBsales@nas.edu). Copyright 2014 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Insti- tute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competencies and with regard for appropriate balance. This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to the pro- cedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. This report was sponsored by the National Cooperative Highway Research Program and the Transportation Research Board. Cover photo by Rhonda Pees, Public Information Officer, Ohio Department of Transporta- tion, District 1. Used with permission. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Transportation investments in response to economic downturns / Committee on Economic and Employment Benefits of Transportation Investments in Response to Economic Downturns, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. pages cm â (Transportation Research Board special report ; 312) ISBN 978-0-309-29492-8 1. Federal aid to transportationâUnited StatesâEvaluation. 2. United States. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. I. National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on Economic and Employment Benefits of Transportation Investments in Response to Economic Downturns. II. Series: Special report (National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board) ; 312. HE308.T737 2014 388'.049âdc23 2014001568
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. On the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a man- date that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. C.â D. (Dan) Mote, Jr., is president of the National Acad- emy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examina- tion of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, on its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academyâs purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the sci- entific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Acad- emies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. C.â D. (Dan) Mote, Jr., are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council. The Transportation Research Board is one of six major divisions of the National Research Council. The mission of the Transportation Research Board is to provide leadership in transportation innovation and progress through research and information exchange, con- ducted within a setting that is objective, interdisciplinary, and multimodal. The Boardâs varied activities annually engage about 7,000 engineers, scientists, and other transporta- tion researchers and practitioners from the public and private sectors and academia, all of whom contribute their expertise in the public interest. The program is supported by state transportation departments, federal agencies including the component administra- tions of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other organizations and individuals interested in the development of transportation. www.TRB.org www.national-academies.org
Committee on Economic and Employment Benefits of Transportation Investments in Response to Economic Downturns Therese J. McGuire, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, Chair Jay Alexander, Washington State Department of Transportation William D. Dupor, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Randall W. Eberts, W.â E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research Ronald L. Epstein, New York State Department of Transportation Andrew Haughwout, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Benjamin F. Jones, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois Nancy J. Richardson, Iowa Department of Transportation (retired) Jay C. Shambaugh, George Washington University, Washington, D.C. Transportation Research Board Staff Joseph R. Morris, Study Director
Preface The Transportation Research Board (TRB) formed the Committee on Economic and Employment Benefits of Transportation Investments in Response to Economic Downturns to conduct a study to aid state and federal officials who may be planning a transportation spending pro- gram intended as economic stimulus during a recession, by providing guidance on how to design an effective program and evaluate the results. The study was motivated by the experience of the states with the trans- portation component of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which provides a valuable case study of the management and impact of a transportation stimulus spending program. The committee included present and former government officials with experience in planning and managing transportation programs and economists with expertise in fiscal policy and in economic develop- ment. The study was sponsored by the state departments of transporta- tion through the National Cooperative Highway Research Program and by TRB. The committee received presentations at its meetings from Jack Wells, U.S. Department of Transportation; Karen White, U.S. Department of Transportation; Phillip Herr, U.S. Government Accountability Office; Heather MacLeod, U.S. Government Accountability Office; and Tracy Gordon, Brookings Institution. In addition, the committee commis- sioned two resource papers, one by Sylvain Leduc and Daniel Wilson and the other by Michael Meyer. The papers are available at http://www. trb.org/Main/Blurbs/170114.aspx. One committee member, William D. Dupor, does not concur with the conclusion of the other members with regard to the effectiveness of transportation stimulus spending in aiding recovery from a recession. vii
viii Transportation Investments in Response to Economic Downturns A statement by Dr. Dupor concerning this part of the study topic is included as an appendix to the report. The report was reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Councilâs (NRCâs) Report Review Com- mittee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that assist the authors and NRC in making the published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The contents of the review comments and draft manuscript remain confi- dential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. NRC thanks the following individuals for their review of this report: Alan J. Auerbach, Uni- versity of California, Berkeley; Tracy Gordon, Brookings Institution; Robert E. Hall, Stanford University; Will Kempton, Orange County Transportation Authority; Herbert S. Levinson, Independent Consultant; Adrian T. Moore, Reason Foundation; John R. Njord, Utah Department of Transportation; and Ricardo Reis, Columbia University. Although the reviewers listed above provided many constructive com- ments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the committeeâs conclusions or recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by National Academy of Sciences members Charles F. Manski, Northwestern University, and Susan Hanson, Clark University. Appointed by NRC, they were respon- sible for making certain that an independent examination of the report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution. Joseph R. Morris managed the study and drafted the report under the guidance of the committee and the supervision of Stephen R. Godwin, Â Director, Studies and Special Programs. Suzanne Schneider, Associate Executive Director of TRB, managed the report review process. ÂNorman Solomon edited the report, Janet M. McNaughton handled the edito- rial production, Juanita L. Green managed the typesetting and print- ing, Jennifer J. Weeks prepared the prepublication manuscript and background papers for web posting, and Jennifer Correro proofread the typeset pages, all under the supervision of Javy Awan, Director of Publications. Amelia Mathis assisted with meeting arrangements and communications with committee members.
Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 9 Study Origin and Objectives 10 Use of Transportation Spending as Stimulus: ARRA and Past Recessions 14 Status of Federal and State Transportation Funding 25 Sources of Information 29 2 Fiscal Policy in Recessions and the Role of Transportation Spending 33 Fiscal Policy in Response to Recessions 33 Transportation Spending as Fiscal Stimulus 53 3 Design, Management, and Outcomes of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Transportation Grants 63 ARRA Transportation Provisions 63 Administration of ARRA Transportation Grants 68 Transportation Spending and Construction Employment During ARRA 80 4 Conclusions and Recommendations 108 Conclusions 108 Recommendations 120
Appendixes 130 A Commissioned Papers and Authors 130 B Statement of Committee Member William D. Dupor 131 Study Committee Biographical Information 153