Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2012). Census of Publicly Funded Forensic Crime Laboratories, 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
Campbell, S. (2010). Deliberative Priority Setting—A CIHR KT Module. Available: http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/deliberative_priority_setting_module_e.pdf [June 2015].
Durlak, J., and DuPre, E. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327-350.
Ernst, T., Berman, T., Buscaglia, J., Eckert-Lumsdon, T., Hanlon, C., Olsson, K., Palenik, C., Ryland, S., Trejos, T., Valadez, M., and Almirall, J.R. (2012). Signal-to-noise ratios in forensic glass analysis by micro X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. X-Ray Spectrometry, 43(1), 13-21.
Executive Office of the President. (2014a, February). Strengthening Forensic Science: A Progress Report. Executive Office of the President of the United States. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/forensicscience_progressreport_feb-2014.pdf [June 18, 2015].
Executive Office of the President. (2014b, May). Strengthening the Forensic Sciences. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, National Science and Technology Council, Committee on Science, Subcommittee on Forensic Science. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/NSTC/forensic_science___may_2014.pdf [May 2015].
Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis. (2012). Latent Print Examination and Human Factors: Improving the Practice Through a Systems Approach. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Gabel, J.D. (2014). Realizing reliability in forensic science from the ground up. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 104(2), 283-352.
Gold, M., and Taylor, E. (2007). Moving research into practice: Lessons from the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s IDSRN program. Implementation Science, 2(9).
Guthrie, S., Wamae, W., Diepeveen, S., Wooding, S., and Grant, J. (2013). Measuring Research: A Guide to Research Evaluation Frameworks and Tools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Available: http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/MG1200/MG1217/RAND_MG1217.pdf [August 2015].
James Bell Associates. (2013). Lessons Learned Through the Application of Implementation Science Concepts to Children’s Bureau Discretionary Grant Programs. Arlington, VA: James Bell Associates. Available: http://www.jbassoc.com/ReportsPublications/CB_ImpScienceReport_Final_012413.pdf [August 2015].
Kilbourne, A., Neumann, M., Pincus, H., Bauer, M., and Stall, R. (2007). Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: Application of the replicating effective programs framework. Implementation Science, 2(42), doi:10.1186/1748-5908-2-42.
Lane, J., and Bertuzzi, S. (2011). Measuring the results of science investments. Science, 331, 678-680.
Laub, J.H. (2011). Strengthening NIJ: Mission, science, and process. NIJ Journal, October(268), 16-21. Available: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/235891.pdf [September 2015].
Lenaway, D., Halverson, P., Sotnikov, S., Tilson, H., Corso, L., and Millington, W. (2006). Public health systems research: Setting a national agenda. American Journal of Public Health, 96(3), 410-413.
Lovrich, N.P., Pratt, T.C., Gaffney, M.J., Johnson, C.L., Asplen, C.H., Hurst, L.H., and Schellberg, T.M. (2004). National Forensic DNA Study Report, Final Report. Pullman: Washington State University.
Martin, B., and Tang, P. (2006). The Benefits from Publicly Funded Research. Brighton, UK: University of Sussex, Science and Technology Policy Research. Available: https://www.sussex.ac.uk/webteam/gateway/file.php?name=sewp161.pdf&site=25 [August 2015].
National Institute of Justice. (2009). Fundamental Research to Improve Understanding of the Accuracy, Reliability, and Measurement Validity of Forensic Science Disciplines. Solicitation SL# 000878. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
National Institute of Justice. (2010). Fundamental Research to Improve Understanding of the Accuracy, Reliability, and Measurement Validity of Forensic Science Disciplines. Solicitation SL# 000909. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
National Institute of Justice. (2011a). The National Institute of Justice Response to the Report of the National Research Council: Strengthening the National Institute of Justice. Special Report. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
National Institute of Justice. (2011b). Electronic Crime and Digital Evidence Recovery. Solicitation No. NIJ-2011-2798. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Available: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/sl000957.pdf [June 2015].
National Institute of Justice. (2011c). Basic Scientific Research to Support Forensic Science for Criminal Justice Purposes. Solicitation No. NIJ-2011-2806. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
National Institute of Justice. (2011d). Applied Research and Development in Forensic Science for Criminal Justice Purposes. Solicitation No. NIJ-2011-2807. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
National Institute of Justice. (2013). National Institute of Justice Annual Report 2013. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Available: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/248568.pdf [June 18, 2015].
National Institute of Justice. (2014a). NIJ R&D Portfolio Management and Technology Transition Support. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
National Institute of Justice. (2014b). Research and Development in Forensic Science for Criminal Justice Purposes. Solicitation No. NIJ-2014-3744. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
National Institute of Justice. (2015a). The Impact of Forensic Science Research and Development. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. Available: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/248572.pdf [April 2015].
National Institute of Justice. (2015b). Research and Development in Forensic Science for Criminal Justice Purposes. Solicitation No. NIJ-2015-3985. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
National Institute of Justice Forensic Technology Center of Excellence. (2015). National Institute of Justice—The Forensic Technology Center of Excellence: Activities and Deliverables 2011 (Q4) Through 2015 (Q1). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2015a). New NIST Center of Excellence to improve statistical analysis of forensic evidence. NIST Tech Beat. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Available: http://nist.gov/forensics/center-excellence-forensic052615.cfm [June 2015].
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2015b). Organization of Scientific Area Committee Organization Chart. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Available: http://www.nist.gov/forensics/osac/upload/OSAC-Block-Org-Chart-3-17-2015-2.pdf [June 2015].
National Research Council. (2004). Forensic Analysis Weighing Bullet Lead Evidence. Committee on Scientific Assessment of Bullet Lead Elemental Composition Comparison. Board on Chemical Science and Technology, Division on Earth and Life Studies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2008a). Ballistic Imaging. Committee to Assess the Feasibility, Accuracy and Technical Capability of a National Ballistics Database. Committee on Law and Justice and Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2008b). Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Committee on Evaluating the Efficiency of Research and Development Programs at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2009a). Principles and Practices for a Federal Statistical Agency: Fourth Edition. Committee on National Statistics. C.F. Citro, M.E. Martin, and M.L. Straf, Editors. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2009b). Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward. Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Science Community. Committee on Science, Technology, and Law and Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2010). Strengthening the National Institute of Justice. Committee on Assessing the Research Program of the National Institute of Justice. Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2011). Measuring the Impacts of Federal Investments in Research: A Workshop Summary. Committee on Measuring Economic and Other Returns on Federal Research Investments. Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2012). Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations. Panel for Review of Best Practices in Assessment of Research and Development Organizations. Laboratory Assessments Board. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. (2014). Furthering America’s Research Enterprise. Committee on Assessing the Value of Research in Advancing National Goals. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council and Federal Judicial Center. (2011). Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence: Third Edition. Committee on the Development of the Third Edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law; Policy and Global Affairs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation. (2014). Investing in Science, Engineering, and Education for the Nation’s Future: Strategic Plan for 2014-2018. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2014/nsf14043/nsf14043.pdf [May 2015].
Nelson, M. (2010). Making sense of DNA backlogs—Myths vs. reality. NIJ Journal, 266. Available: http://www.nij.gov/journals/266/Pages/backlogs.aspx [June 2015].
Office of Investigative and Forensic Sciences. (2015). Reviewer’s Checklist: FY2015 Research and Development in Forensic Science for Criminal Justice Purposes Application Rating Sheet. Washington, DC: Office of Investigative and Forensic Sciences, National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
Office of Justice Programs. (2013). OJP Standard Operation Procedure of OJP Peer Review. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
O’Leary, A.E., Oberacher, H., Hall, S.E., and Mulligan, C.C. (2015). Combining a portable tandem mass spectrometer with automated library searching: An important step toward streamlined, onsite identification of forensic evidence. Analytical Methods, 7, 3331-3339.
Transportation Research Board. (2013). Letter Report on Review of the U.S. DOT Strategic Plan for Research, Development, and Technology 2013-2018. Committee for Review of the U.S. Department of Transportation Strategic Plan for Research, Development, and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2013). Charter: National Commission on Forensic Science. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Available: http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/ncfs/legacy/2014/05/13/ncfs-charter.pdf [June 2015].
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2013). DOJ Could Improve Decision-Making Documentation and Better Assess Results of DNA Backlog Reduction Program Funds. GAO-13-605. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office.
van Achterberg, T., Schoonhoven, L., and Grol, R. (2008). Nursing implementation science: How evidence-based nursing requires evidence-based implementation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 40(4), 302-310.
