Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
68 6. REFERENCES 1. Han, J., and Shiwakoti, H., Development of a rapid test to determine moisture sensitivity of hot mix asphalt (Superpave) mixtures. Kansas DOT, Topeka, Kansas, 2010. 2. âMoisture Sensitivity Testing of HMAâ, I.M. 319, Iowa DOT, Ames, Iowa, 2013. 3. âMethod of Test For Hamburg Wheel Track Testing of Compacted Bituminous Mixturesâ, MT 334- 110-090211, Montana DOT, Helena, Montana, 2011. 4. âHamburg Wheel-Track Testing of Compacted Bituminous Mixturesâ, CP-L 5112, 8 Colorado DOT, Denver, Colorado, 2009. 5. âMethod of Test for Hamburg Wheel-Track Testing of Compacted HMAâ, Section 39-12 1.01D, Utah DOT, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2011. 6. âTest Procedure for Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Testâ, TEX-242-F, Texas DOT, Austin, Texas, 2009. 7. âMethod of Test for Hamburg Rut Testing Of Compacted Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA)â, OHD L-55, Oklahoma DOT, Oklahoma, August 15, 2014. 8. WisDOT Modified Test Procedure for AASHTO T-324, Wisconsin State Department of Transportation, Wisconsin, 2014. 9. Louisiana Standard Specifications for Roads and Bridges, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 2015. 10. Modified AASHTO T-324 specification, California Department of Transportation, California, 2014. 11. Modified AASHTO T-324 specification, Illinois Department of Transportation, Illinois, 2014. 12. Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Multiple Construction, M41-10, Washington DOT, 2014. 13. Hines, M., âThe Hamburg Wheel Tracking Device,â Proceedings of the Twenty-Eight Paving and Transportation Conference, Civil Engineering Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 1991. 14. Solaimanian, M., H. John, T. Maghsoud, and T. Vivek. Test Methods to Predict Moisture Sensitivity of Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements. Moisture Sensitivity of Asphalt Pavements: A National Seminar. San Diego, California, Feb. 4â6, 2003. 15. Mohammad L., Abadie C., Gokmen R., and Puppala A., Mechanistic Evaluation of Hydrated Lime in Hot-Mix Asphalt Mixtures, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1723, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.,1997. 16. Aschenbrener, T. and G. Currier. Influence of Testing Variables on the Results from the Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device. CDOT-DTD-R-93-22. Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, 1993. 17. Schram, S. A. and R. C. Williams. Ranking of HMA Moisture Sensitivity Tests in Iowa. Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013. 18. Aschenbrener, T., R. L. Terrel, and R. A. Zamora, âComparison of the Hamburg Wheel Tracking Device and Environmental Conditioning System to Pavements of Known Stripping Performance,â Colorado Department of Transportation, CDOTDTD-R-94-1, 1994. 19. Yin F., Arambula E., Lytton R., Martin A., and Cucalon L., Novel Method for Moisture Susceptibility and Rutting Evaluation Using Hamburg Wheel Tracking Test, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2446, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014. 20. Federal Highway Administration, LTPPBind Version 2.1 (Software), FHWA, McLean, Virginia, July 1999. 21. Bonaquist, R., NCHRP Report 629: Ruggedness Testing of the Dynamic Modulus and Flow Number Tests with the Simple Performance Tester. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008.
69 22. Schram, S., Williams, R., and Buss, A., Reporting Results from the Hamburg Wheel Tracking Device, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2446, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014.