National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 6: Conclusions, Limitations and Future Research
Page 142
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Alternative Quality Management Systems for Highway Construction. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22127.
×
Page 142
Page 143
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Alternative Quality Management Systems for Highway Construction. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22127.
×
Page 143
Page 144
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Alternative Quality Management Systems for Highway Construction. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22127.
×
Page 144
Page 145
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Alternative Quality Management Systems for Highway Construction. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22127.
×
Page 145
Page 146
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Alternative Quality Management Systems for Highway Construction. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22127.
×
Page 146
Page 147
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Alternative Quality Management Systems for Highway Construction. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22127.
×
Page 147
Page 148
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Alternative Quality Management Systems for Highway Construction. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22127.
×
Page 148
Page 149
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Alternative Quality Management Systems for Highway Construction. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22127.
×
Page 149
Page 150
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Alternative Quality Management Systems for Highway Construction. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22127.
×
Page 150

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

REFERENCES American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). Standard Practice for Definition of Terms Related to Quality and Statistics as Used in Highway Construction, R010-06-UL, 2006, 26 pp. Alder, R., “UDOT Construction Manager General Contract (CMGC) Annual Report,” Engineering Services and Bridge Design Section, Utah Department of Transportation Project Development Group, Salt Lake City, 2007, pp. 39. American Society for Quality (ASQ), “Quality Glossary”, viewed May 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.asq.org/info/ glossary/ Anderson, S. D. and B. C. Blaschke, NCHRP Synthesis 331: Statewide Highway Letting Program Management, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, 60 pp. Anderson, S. D. and I. Damnjanovic, NCHRP Synthesis 379: Selection and Evaluation of Alternative Contracting Methods to Accelerate Project Completion, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, 77 pp. Anonymous (a). "Baldrige Performance Exellence Program” website. [Online]. Available: http://www.nist.gov/baldrige/about/baldrige_faqs.cfm Arditi, D. and D. Lee, “Service quality performance of design/build contractors using quality function deployment,” Construction Management and Economics. London: Vol. 22 (2), Feb. 2004, pp. 123–157. Arizona Department of Transportation Intermodal Transportation Division (ADOT), Design- Build Procurement and Administration Guide, 2nd Edition, ADOT Construction Group, Phoenix, December 2001, [Online]. Available: http://www.azdot.gov/Highways/ConstGrp/DesignBuildGuide.asp Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), Contracts and Specifications Section and Engineering Consultants Section Design Build Package Request for Statements of Qualifications and Requests for Proposals: Cortaro Road Interchange MP 245.8, Pima County, Phoenix, AZ, 1997. Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD), Design-Build Guidelines and Procedures, Little Rock, AR, April 2006. Atzei, A., P. Groepper, M. Novara, and K. Pseiner, “Innovations for Competitiveness: European Views on ‘better-faster-cheaper’,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 44, Nos. 7–12, April–June 1999, pp. 745–754. Avant, J., “Innovative Government Contracting,” Master’s Thesis, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL., 1999, pp.22–29. 140

Australian/New Zealand Standard (A/NZS) Quality Management—Guidelines for Configuration Management, AS/NZS 3907:1996/ISO 10007:1995, Standards Australia, Homebush, New South Wales, Australia, 1996, 23 pp. Battikha, M. G. and A. D. Russell, “Construction Quality Management - Present and Future,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1998, pp. 401–411. Beard, J. L., M. C. Loulakis, E.C. Wundram, Design Build Planning Through Development. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001. Beard, J. L. and R. A. Belle, Quality Assurance and Quality Control for Design-Build and Integrated Delivery Processes, Integrated Performance Report #701, Design Build Institute of America, Washington D.C., 2003, 33 pp. Blanding, J., “Quality Incentives: A Federal Perspective,” Transportation Research Circular E- C090 Design-Build: A Quality Process, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, 9 pp. Burati Jr., J. L. "Causes of quality deviations in design and construction." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 118, No. 1, 1992, pp. 34–49. Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), Request for Proposal, Book 1, Southeast Corridor Multi-modal Project, RFP No. 11584, Denver, CO, 2000. Committee on Management of Quality Assurance, “Glossary of Highway Quality Assurance Terms,” Transportation Research Circular E-C037, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., April 2002, 27 pp. DeCorso, E., “How Owners Communicate Quality in Public Sector Design-Build Requests for Proposals,” Honors Thesis, University of Oklahoma Norman, OK, 2004. Deming, W. E., Out of the crisis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge, MA., 1986. Desai, A., and A. Mital, “Managing quality: the transition from reactive to proactive strategies.” International Journal of Product Development, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2009, pp. 2–2. Design-Build Institute of America (DBIA), Manual of Policy Statements. Design-Build Institute of America, Washington, D.C., 1998, p. 5. Dowall, D. E. and J. Whittington, Making Room for the Future: Rebuilding California’s Infrastructure, Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco, 2003, 13 pp. Doren, D., M. Bridgers, and M. Napier, FMI/CMAA Sixth Annual Survey of Owners, Construction Management Association of America, McLean, Va., 2005 [Online]. Available: http://cmaanet.org/user_images/owners_survey_6.pdf 141

Drennon, P. W, “Utah's I-15, a transportation case study: Role of the owner's design professional in design/build and in the provisions for quality,” Quality Congress. ASQ's Annual Quality Congress Proceedings, Milwaukee, 1998, p. 166. Dufferin, O. “Canadian Contractor Builds on ISO 9002 Status,” Public Roads, Vol. 36, No. 7, July 1998, pp.1–14. Dunston, P. S., J. F. McManus and J. A. Gambatese, “Cost/Benefits of Constructability Reviews,” Final Report, NCHRP Project 20-07, Task 124, University of Washington, 2002, p. 2. Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division (EFLHD), Request for Proposals IBC-8888(012) Book 1, Federal-aid Project No. IBC-8888(012), District of Columbia Department of Public Work, 2001. Ernzen, J. and T. Feeney, “Contractor-Led Quality Control and Quality Assurance Plus Design- Build: Who Is Watching The Quality?” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1813, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 253–259. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Construction Quality Assurance for Design-Build Highway Projects, Technical Briefing, FHWA Publication No.: FHWA-HRT-12-039, April 2012, 8 pp. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), “SEP-14 Active Project List,” Washington, D.C., 2009. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/programadmin/contracts/sep14list.cfm Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Design-Build Effectiveness Study – As Required by TEA-21 Section 1307(f): Final Report, USDOT Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., January 2006, 215pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/designbuild/designbuild0.htm Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Use of Contractor Test Results in the Acceptance Decision, Recommended Quality Measures, and the Identification of Contractor/Department Risks, Technical Advisory 6120.3, August 2004. Federal Transit Authority (FTA). “Tri-Met’s Construction Manager/General Contractor Approach Lessons Learned 44,” Publication 1363, Federal Transit Administration, Washington D.C., 2003[Online]. Available: http://www.fta.dot.gov/printer_friendly/publications_1363.html Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Design-Build Guidelines, Tallahassee, FL, February 8, 2006. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Request for Proposal, Milling and Resurfacing of Interstate 95, Financial Projects NO. 409846-1-52-01; Federal-aid Project NO. 0953 102 I; Contract NO. E-5F84, District 5, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2003. 142

FMI/CMAA. The Results of FMI/CMAA’s Fourth Annual Survey of Owners, McLean, VA, 2003, 20 pp. [Online] Available: http://www.cmaafoundation.org/careers-in-cm/research Gonderinger, C., “TH 14/218 Design-Build Project Technical Memorandum Quality Management Plan (QC/QA Requirements),” Minnesota Department of Transportation Technical Memorandum, St. Paul, MN, 2001, pp 1–17. Gransberg, D. D., J. Datin, K., Molenaar, NCHRP Synthesis 376: Quality Assurance in Design- Build Projects, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies , Washington D.C., 2008, 138 pp. Gransberg, D. D. and J. S. Shane, NCHRP Synthesis 402: Construction Manager-at-Risk Project Delivery for Highway Programs, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2010, 135 pp. Gransberg, D. D. and K. R. Molenaar, “Does Design-Build Project Delivery Affect the Future of the Public Engineer?” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2081, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, December 2008, pp. 3–8. Gransberg, D. D. and K. R. Molenaar, “Analysis of Owner’s Design and Construction Quality Management Approaches in Design-Build Projects” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2004. Gransberg, D. D. and E. Windel, “Communicating Design Quality Requirements for Public Sector Design/Build Projects,” Journal of Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 24, No. 2, April 2008, pp. 105–110. Halstead, W. J., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 65: Quality Assurance. TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1979, 42 pp. Henner, J., “Legal and Contractual Issues in Military Design-Build Projects,” Proceedings, 2007 North Carolina State University Military Design-Build Forum, Raleigh, North Carolina, 2007, p.15. Hughes, C. S., NCHRP Synthesis 346: State Construction Quality Assurance Programs, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2005, 83 pp. Koch, J. E., D. D. Gransberg, and K. R. Molenaar, Project Administration for Design-Build: A Primer for Owners, Engineers, and Contractors, ASCE Press, Reston, Virginia, 2010, 286 pp. Kwak, Y. H. and R. Bushey, “Construction Management at Risk: An Innovative Project Delivery Method at Stormwater Treatment Area in the Everglades, Florida,” Proceedings, Construction Congress VI Orlando, Florida, 2000, pp. 477–482. 143

Ladino, M. J., K. A. Reedy, and J. E. Carlson, “Alternate Project Delivery in Horizontal Construction,” presentation, Annual Meeting, Associated General Contractors of America, Las Vegas, NV, Mar. 2008, 25 pp. Leahy, R. B., Transportation Research Circular E-C137: Glossary of Highway Quality Assurance Terms, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., May 2009, 44 pp. Lee, J. “CM/GC at Oregon DOT,” Presentation, WASHTO Conference, Portland, OR, 2008, 14 pp. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (LADOTD), Request for Proposals, New Mississippi River Bridge: St. Francisville to New Roads including Approaches and Connecting Roadways Route LA 10, Design-Build Project, State Project No. 052-02-0024, et al, West Feliciana and Pointe Coupee Parishes, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Baton Rouge, LA, 2005. Loulakis, M.C. and Shean, O. J., “Risk Transference in Design-Build Contracting,” Construction Briefings, 2nd series, Federal Publications, Washington, DC, 1996, 12 pp. Maine Department of Transportation, (Maine DOT), Request for Proposals, I-295 Commercial Street Connector, FHWA Project No. IMD-7589(300); MDOT Project No. 7589.30, Maine Department of Transportation, Augusta, 2003. Mendez, Victor. “About Every Day Counts: Message from the Administrator”, Washington, D.C. (2010). [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/everydaycounts/about/ Miller, J. B., M. J. Garvin, C. W. Ibbs, and S. E. Mahoney. “Toward a New Paradigm: Simultaneous Use of Multiple Project Delivery Methods,” Journal of Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 16 (3), 2000, pp.58–68. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Request for Proposals, Book 1 – TH 61 Hastings Bridge Design-Build Project S.P. 1913-64, Minnesota DOT, Metro District, St. Paul, MN, January 13, 2010, p. 7. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), T.H. 52 (Rochester) Design-Build Request for Proposals S.P. 5502-85 Part 1: Scope of Work, District Six – Rochester, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Rochester, MN, 2002. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Request for Qualifications T.H. 52 Design- Build Project S.P. 5502-67, 5507-45, 5508-78; HPPMN45(101), NH014(308), District Six – Rochester, Minnesota Department of Transportation, Rochester, MN, 2001a. Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), Part I: Scope of Work T.H. 100–Duluth St. S.P. 2735-172, Design-Build Request for Proposals, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, MN, 2001b. 144

Miron, A., R. B. Rogers and P. A. Kopac, “Applying Advanced Quality Systems In the Highway Industry,” Public Roads, Vol. 72, No. 2, Sep/Oct 2008, pp.1–14. Mississippi Department of Transportation (MissDOT), Request for Proposals, Addendum 1, A Design-Build Project Bridge Replacement on US 90 Biloxi to Ocean Springs Bridge Jackson and Harrison Counties, Mississippi, Contract No. ER/BR-0003-01(099) 104556/301000 – Biloxi/Ocean Springs Bridge, Jackson, MS, 2005a. Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT), Request for Proposals, Addendum 1, A Design-Build Project Bridge Replacement on US 90 Over St. Louis Bay Hancock and Harrison Counties, Mississippi, Project No. ER/BR-0003-01(098) 104555/301000 – US 90 St. Louis Bay Bridge Replacement, Jackson, MS, 2005b. Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), Final Request for Proposals, for The New I- 64 Design-Build Project, Project Number J6I0978, Book 1, , Chesterfield, MO, 2006. National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE), “Design/Build in the Public Sector,” NSPE Board of Directors, Position Statement #1726, 1995, [Online]. Available: http://www.nspe.org/govrel/gr2-ps1726.asp National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), “Collapse of I-35W Highway Bridge, Minneapolis, Minnesota, August 1, 2007,” Highway Accident Report HAR-08/03, NTSB, Washington, DC, 2008. [Online] Available: http://www.ntsb.gov/publictn/2008/HAR0803.htm New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), Design-Build Procedures Manual, Volume 1, Albany, September 2005, 141 pp. Oppenheim, A. N., Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement, Continuum, London, 1992. Pantazides, L., “Managing Quality on Transportation Mega Projects,” ASQ World Conference on Quality and Improvement Proceedings, Milwaukee, WI, Vol. 59, 2005 pp. 289–297. Parker, F., and R. E. Turochy, NCHRP Web-Only Document 115: Using the Results of Contractor-Performed Tests in Quality Assurance, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2006. Pocock, J. B., S. T. Kuennen, J. Gambatese, and J. Rauschkolb, “Constructability State of Practice Report,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 132, No. 4, Apr. 1, 2006, p. 375. Postma, S. E., R. Cisneros, J. Roberts, R. Wilkison, J. Clevenger, and A. Eastwood, I-15 Corridor Reconstruction Project Design/Build Evaluation 2001 Annual Report: Report No. UT-02.11. Utah Department of Transportation Research Division, Salt Lake City, UT, 2002, 36 pp. 145

Qaasim, H. A., “Comprehensive Quality Assurance for Rapid Transit,” ASQ World Conference on Quality and Improvement Proceedings, Milwaukee, WI, Vol. 59, 2005, pp. 299–307. Richmond, D., J. Cown, D. Ball, and J. M. Rolland, “Private Sector Investments in Public Infrastructure,” Canadian Council for Public–Private Partnerships, 2006, p. 14, [Online]. Available: http://www.pppcouncil.ca/pdf/metropolis_06152006.pdf San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, Design/Build Services: San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Entire Corridor IFB, No. S90-19, Transportation Corridor Agency, Costa Mesa, CA, 1991. Scheepbouwer, E., “Design-Build Contracting Using a Competitively Negotiated Design,” Proceedings, 2010 Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington, DC, 2010, 10 pp. Scott, S., K. R. Molenaar, D. D. Gransberg, and N. C. Smith, NCHRP Report 561: Best-Value Procurement Methods for Highway Construction Projects, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2006, 214 pp. Shilstone, J. M. S., "Quality Management for Concrete Pavement Under Performance Standards." Transportation Research Record 1340, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 48–55. Smith, G. R., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 263: State DOT Management Techniques for Materials and Construction Acceptance, TRB, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 1998, 51 pp. Smith N.C., “Getting What You Paid For: the Quality Assurance and Acceptance Process for Transportation Projects,” Proceedings, American Bar Association Forum on the Construction Industry, Denver, CO, 2001, pp. 17–18. Songer, A.D. and Molenaar, K.R., “Selecting Design–Build: Private and Public Sector Owner Attitudes,” ASCE Journal of Engineering Management, Vol. 12, Issue 6, 1996, pp. 47–53. Strang, W., “The Risk in CM at-Risk,” CM eJournal, Construction Management Association of America, 2002, pp. 1–9. Texas Turnpike Authority (TTA). SH 130 Turnpike Project Exclusive Development Agreement, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX, 2002. Texas Turnpike Authority (TTA). Request for Proposals to Construct, Maintain and Repair the SH 130 Turnpike Through an Exclusive Development Agreement, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX, 2001. Touran, A., D. D. Gransberg, and K. R. Molenaar, “A System for Selecting Project Delivery Methods in US Airports,” Journal of Airport Management, Airports Council International, Vol.4, Issue 4, July 2010, pp. 305–314. 146

Touran, A., D. D. Gransberg, K. R. Molenaar, K. Ghavamifar, D. J. Mason, and L. A. Fithian, TCRP Report 131: A Guidebook for the Evaluation of Project Delivery Methods. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009. Trauner Consulting Services, “Innovative Procurement Practices Alternative Procurement and Contracting Methods,” California Department of Transportation Report No. 53A0104 Sacramento, California, 2007, p. 10–12 Transportation Research Board (TRB), Transportation Research Circular E-C074 Glossary of Highway Quality Assurance Terms., Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2005, p. 8. Turochy, R. E., J. R. Willis, and F. Parker, “Comparison of Contractor Quality Control and Georgia Department of Transportation Data for Quality Assurance of Hot-Mix Asphalt,” Presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January 2007, 16 pp. Uhlik, F. T. and M. D. Eller, “Alternative Delivery Approaches for Military Medical Construction Projects,” Journal of Architectural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1999, pp. 149–155. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), MILCON Transformation Model RFP, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., 2006, [Online]. Available: ftp://ftp.usace.army.mil/pub/hqusace/MILCON%20TRANSFORMATION/ U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), “Early Contractor Involvement: Seabrook Gate Complex,” Pre-Proposal Conference Presentation, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C., 2009, 28 pp. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Quality Management, Engineer Regulation 1110-1-12, Department of the Army, Washington, DC, 2006, 31 pp. Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT), Request for Proposals, SR-92; East of I-15 in Lehi, Utah County, Project No. STP-0092(5)1, Orem, UT, 2005. Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT), Request for Proposals, I-15 Corridor Reconstruction Project, Project No. *SP-15-7(135)296, Orem, UT, 1997. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), Request for Proposals, A Design-Build Project Approaches and Bridge over Garden Creek Canal (Route 609) Mathews County, Virginia, Project No. 0609-057-140, P106, M501, B601, R201, Matthews County, Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, VA, 2006. Warne, Thomas R., Transportation Research Circular E-C090 Design-Build: A Quality Process, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., January 2006, 17 pp. 147

Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), “WSDOT Design-Build Guidance Statement – Independent Assurance (IA) for Design/Build Projects,” WSDOT Design-Build Guidebook, Version 1, Olympia, WA, 2007 p. 2. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), Guidebook for Design-Build Highway Project Development, Olympia, WA, June 20, 2004, 85 pp. Wichern, S., “Protecting Design-Build Owners Through Design Liability Coverage, Independent Construction Managers, and Quality Control Procedures,” Transportation Law Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, Fall 2004, pp 35–56. Yakowenko, G., “Project Delivery: Design-Build and Construction Manager/General Contractor,” Presentation, FHWA Every Day Counts Initiative, Regional Summit, Denver, CO, 2010. Yin, R. K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications Beverly Hills, CA, 2003. Yuan, J., J. A. Roberts, C. N. Fu, and G. W. Raba, “The Independent Construction Quality Assurance Program of State Highway 130 Project: The Perspective of the Independent Construction Quality Assurance Firm,” Presented at the 86th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January 2007, 17 pp. 148

Next: Appendix A: Glossary »
Alternative Quality Management Systems for Highway Construction Get This Book
×
 Alternative Quality Management Systems for Highway Construction
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Web-Only Document 212: Alternative Quality Management Systems for Highway Construction documents the research process, data collection and analysis used to develop NCHRP Report 808: Guidebook on Alternative Quality Management Systems for Highway Construction.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!