National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Conclusions and Recommendations
Page 46
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Application of Geospatial Ecological Tools and Data in the Planning and Programming Phases of Delivering New Highway Capacity: Proof of Concept—US-101, California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22310.
×
Page 46
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Application of Geospatial Ecological Tools and Data in the Planning and Programming Phases of Delivering New Highway Capacity: Proof of Concept—US-101, California. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22310.
×
Page 47

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

References Ball, I. R., H. P. Possingham, and M. Watts. 2009. Marxan and Relatives: Software for Spatial Conservation Prioritisation. In Spatial Conservation Prioritisation: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools (A. Moilanen, K. A. Wilson, and H. P. Possingham, eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, pp. 185–195. BenDor, T., J. Sholtes, and M. W. Doyle. 2009. Landscape Characteristics of a Stream and Wetland Mitigation Banking Program. Ecological Applications 8, pp. 2078– 92. BenDor, T., and A. Stewart. 2011. Land Use Planning and Social Equity in North Carolina's Compensatory Wetland and Stream Mitigation Programs. Environmental Management, Vol. 47, pp. 239–53. Brown, J. 2006. Eco-logical: An Ecosystem Approach to Developing Infrastructure Projects. U.S. Department of Transportation Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Cambridge, Mass. California Department of Fish and Game. 2012. California Wetlands Mitigation Banking. Report to the Legislature. https://www.dfg.ca.gov/habcon/conplan/mitbank/cmb_pubs.html. Caliskan, E. 2013. Environmental Impacts of Forest Road Construction on Mountainous Terrain. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Sciences & Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 23. Forkenbrock, D., and G. Weisbrod. 2001. NCHRP Report 456: Guidebook for Assessing Social and Economic Effects of Transportation Projects. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Girvetz, E. H., J. H. Thorne, J. F. Quinn, and M. C. McCoy. 2008. Early Biological Mitigation Needs Assessment: Elkhorn Slough Pilot Project. Technical report to the California Department of Transportation. University of California, Davis. Huber, P. R. 2011. A Statewide Caltrans Mitigation Needs Assessment in Support of the Statewide Advance Mitigation Initiative (SAMI). Presented at International Conference on Ecology and Transportation, Seattle, Wash. Huber, P. R., D. R. Cameron, J. H. Thorne, and T. M. Frink. 2009. Regional Advance Mitigation Planning: A Pilot Study Integrating Multi-Agency Mitigation Needs and Actions Within a Comprehensive Ecological Framework. Presented at International Conference on Ecology and Transportation, Duluth, Minn. Huber, P. R., F. M. Shilling, J. H. Thorne, S. E. Greco, J. F. Quinn, N. E. Roth, J. D. Hightower, and L. Podolsky. 2010. Incorporating Landscape Connectivity Principles into Planning at Multiple Spatial Scales in an Intensive Agricultural Region. Presented at International Association for Landscape Ecology, Athens, Ga. 40

Huber, P. R., J. H. Thorne, and N. R. Siepel. 2013. Convergence of Green- and Blueprints: Integrating Long Range Transportation Planning and Landscape Connectivity. Presented at International Conference on Environment and Transportation, Scottsdale, Ariz. Meriano, M., N. Eyles, and K. W. Howard. 2009. Hydrogeological Impacts of Road Salt from Canada's Busiest Highway on a Lake Ontario Watershed (Frenchman's Bay) and Lagoon, City of Pickering. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, Vol. 107, No. 1–2, pp. 66–81. Thorne J. H., S. Gao, A. H. Hollander, J. A. Kennedy, M. McCoy, R. A. Johnston, and J. F. Quinn. 2006. Modeling Potential Species Richness and Urban Buildout to Identify Mitigation Sites Along a California Highway. Journal of Transportation Research D, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 233–314. Thorne, J. H., E. Girvetz, and M. C. McCoy. 2008. Report on California State-Wide Mitigation Needs Forecasting Database. Technical report to the California Department of Transportation. University of California, Davis. Thorne, J. H., E. H. Girvetz, and M. McCoy. 2009a. Evaluating Aggregate Terrestrial Impacts of Road Construction Projects for Advanced Regional Mitigation. Environmental Management, Vol. 43, pp. 936–948. Thorne, J. H., P. Huber, E. Girvetz, J. F. Quinn, and M. McCoy. 2009b. Integration of Regional Mitigation Assessment and Conservation Planning. Ecology and Society, Vol. 14, Article 47. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art47/. Thorne, J. H., P. R. Huber, E. O’Donoghue, and M. J. Santos. 2014. The Use of Regional Advanced Mitigation Planning (RAMP) to Integrate Transportation Infrastructure Impacts with Sustainability: A Perspective from the USA. Environmental Research Letters. Vol. 9, No. 6. http://stacks.iop.org/1748-9326/9/065001. Thorne, J., M. McCoy, A. Hollander, N. Roth, and J. Quinn. 2005. Regional Analysis for Transportation Corridor Planning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Environment and Transportation, San Diego, Calif. Thorne, J. H., E. O’Donoghue, P. R. Huber, and M. McCoy. 2011. Moving Forward, a Review of California’s Approaches to the Challenges and Solutions for Successful Regional Advance Mitigation Planning. Presented at International Conference on Ecology and Transportation, Seattle, Wash. 41

Next: Memorandum of Understanding Signatory Sheet »
Application of Geospatial Ecological Tools and Data in the Planning and Programming Phases of Delivering New Highway Capacity: Proof of Concept—US-101, California Get This Book
×
 Application of Geospatial Ecological Tools and Data in the Planning and Programming Phases of Delivering New Highway Capacity: Proof of Concept—US-101, California
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) Capacity Project C40B has released a report that demonstrates the transferability of previously-developed methods to assess biological and ecological impacts from transportation projects. The report also documents the development of a national impact scoping tool.

The C40B project also produced Regulatory Acceptability of Remotely Sensed Data and an additional proof of concept report about the Contra Costa County Transportation Authority.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!